SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

nhl roster offseason

Created by: ScumbagBenG
Team: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 8, 2024
Published: Jan. 8, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,000,000
8$12,000,000
1$800,000
2$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,750,000
2$1,500,000
2$2,000,000
2$2,000,000
6$4,250,000
4$4,250,000
Trades
VAN
  1. Matheson, Michael ($1,875,000 retained)
MTL
  1. Kuzmenko, Andrei
  2. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
  3. 2024 4th round pick (NJD)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,571,667$0$475,000$128,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$12,000,000$12,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 8 at 1:45 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,315
Likes: 9,490
Overpay for Matheson, and the Canucks have no interest in him considering his history with Pettersson
Jan. 8 at 1:54 p.m.
#2
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,013
Likes: 3,596
that is a big price for matheson. i understand you're getting huge retention but wow
Jan. 8 at 1:55 p.m.
#3
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,013
Likes: 3,596
Quoting: mv21227
Overpay for Matheson, and the Canucks have no interest in him considering his history with Pettersson


idk, that hit was in 2018. probably been put to rest now. we have seen rutherford target matheson in the past (traded to pitt from florida). wouldnt surpise me if they were interested again.

probably not at this cost, though
Jan. 8 at 1:56 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
ScumbagBenG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
maybe your right but getting matheson for 3m for 2 years isnt much of any overpayment considering itll most likely be a late 1st and kuzmenko hasnt been anywhere near as good as he was last year
Jan. 8 at 2:00 p.m.
#5
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
Send Kuzmenko somewhere else and remove retention. Montreal doesn't need a pending(+1) UFA and isn't going to use the retention slot.
Might get more value out of Kuzmenko that way, though if you are moving him you wouldn't really need the retention.
jpsnow13 liked this.
Jan. 8 at 2:00 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 1,208
Habs decline.
Matheson wants to stay in Montreal, and Habs have no interest in Kuzmenko.
Vancouver shouldn’t trade their first round pick.
No thanks.
remowilliams liked this.
Jan. 8 at 2:01 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,315
Likes: 9,490
Quoting: The_Rocket
idk, that hit was in 2018. probably been put to rest now. we have seen rutherford target matheson in the past (traded to pitt from florida). wouldnt surpise me if they were interested again.

probably not at this cost, though


Even then, I wouldn’t want to risk this and making Pettersson unhappy. Also I don’t think Matheson is the right type of dman for us to target. A lot of his offensive production comes on the PP, which he wouldn’t play on for us, and he’s not strong defensively
The_Rocket and remowilliams liked this.
Jan. 8 at 2:03 p.m.
#8
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,013
Likes: 3,596
Quoting: ScumbagBenG
maybe your right but getting matheson for 3m for 2 years isnt much of any overpayment considering itll most likely be a late 1st and kuzmenko hasnt been anywhere near as good as he was last year


matheson has been pretty underwhelming since getting to montreqal. he has been performing poorly in a top pairing role.
.

if you're going to spend assets like that, aim higher
this is a bigger package than Van gave up for hronek who is younger and better and right handed
Jan. 8 at 2:15 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
ScumbagBenG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Quoting: The_Rocket
matheson has been pretty underwhelming since getting to montreqal. he has been performing poorly in a top pairing role.
.

if you're going to spend assets like that, aim higher
this is a bigger package than Van gave up for hronek who is younger and better and right handed


i wouldnt say underwhelming hes definitely not a top paring guy, but nobody shouldve expected him to be. His defense would get better playing against weaker lines and with a better partner and in my opinion VAN could use a better puck mover outside the top pairing. Maybe the package was to much but i dont see kuzmenko staying with VAN for much longer.
Jan. 8 at 2:23 p.m.
#10
You know nothing JS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 4,450
Quoting: The_Rocket
matheson has been pretty underwhelming since getting to montreqal. he has been performing poorly in a top pairing role.
.

if you're going to spend assets like that, aim higher
this is a bigger package than Van gave up for hronek who is younger and better and right handed


25 minutes/games (6th), 27 points in 39 games (13th)

"underwhelming "

Yeezus Price -_-
SMH liked this.
Jan. 8 at 2:32 p.m.
#11
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 1,290
Its all late picks, montreal ain't trading a top pair D for late picks, the chances of replacing a player of his caliber woth those picks are slim to non
Jan. 8 at 2:37 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
ScumbagBenG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Quoting: SMH
Its all late picks, montreal ain't trading a top pair D for late picks, the chances of replacing a player of his caliber woth those picks are slim to non


matheson being 30 in the offseason isnt in the habs window so might as well sell while his value is the highest
Jan. 8 at 2:59 p.m.
#13
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,013
Likes: 3,596
Quoting: jpsnow13
25 minutes/games (6th), 27 points in 39 games (13th)

"underwhelming "

Yeezus Price -_-


8 5v5 points (95th), 54 5v5 shots on goal (36th), 47.92 GF% (6th out of all 9 mtl dmen), 45.02 xGF% (8th out of all 9 mtl dmen).

matheson has 15 powerplay points. prior to this season, his career high for pp points was 9.

you remove his power play points and what you get left with is a 2nd pairing dman who is playing way above his head in the montreal line up. unsustainable powerplay production mixed with middling to poor 5v5 results? yeah, canucks need to aim higher
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll