SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

winger swap

Created by: Novistic
Team: 2023-24 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 9, 2024
Published: Jan. 9, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2026
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$65,001,750$0$7,225,000$18,498,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$812,500$812,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$687,500$687,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$810,000$810,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$550,000$550K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Who wins this trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jan. 9 at 1:40 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,801
Likes: 1,211
Nice try.
Marner is not available.
Jan. 9 at 1:41 a.m.
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,297
Likes: 7,087
Gibson would decline, but wouldn't have to because Verbeek would decline. Marner isn't a Verbeek type player, and we don't feel like paying a winger 13 million AAV.
Jan. 9 at 1:45 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 1,319
Marner has a NMC. He's not going anywhere
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 9 at 1:52 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 9,007
Likes: 3,491
Edited Jan. 9 at 2:05 a.m.
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Gibson would decline, but wouldn't have to because Verbeek would decline. Marner isn't a Verbeek type player, and we don't feel like paying a winger 13 million AAV.


I agree that this won't happen since Marner, Gibson, and Treliving would not be interested in this, and perhaps Verbeek as well but I don't think it would be because Marner isn't a Verbeek-type player. I would argue that as a player, Verbeek would covet Marner for what he does on both ends of the ice. The AAV on Marner's next contract might be a concern, but before that, the big concern would be whether they would be able to retain him in the first place even if he agrees to waive in the off-season.

The other issue that Verbeek might have with this is that it accelerates their rebuild but the team wouldn't be ready to compete. If they are bringing in Marner, would they want to trade Gibson in the first place (someone the Leafs need less than they need Marner or a top-end defender)? In terms of cap, he's the easy target to move along with Zegras but I'm sure they would be in search of a goalie even if they like what they have with Dostal, which then doesn't make a whole lot of sense for them. If Marner were to hit free agency then I think they would pay a ton of money to acquire him because they would then be in a position where they could be expected to compete. They could then trade Zegras elsewhere if they wanted to further bolster the defense.
Jan. 9 at 2:04 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 786
Likes: 175
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Gibson would decline, but wouldn't have to because Verbeek would decline. Marner isn't a Verbeek type player, and we don't feel like paying a winger 13 million AAV.

When you have an opportunity to acquire talent like Marner, it’s not going to matter whether the player is a “insert GM name” guy or not. That’s like saying Verbeek wouldn’t draft Bedard because he’s not 6”3 220😂 If Marner was offered to Anaheim for that laughable return they’d take it and run😂
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 9 at 2:11 a.m.
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,297
Likes: 7,087
Quoting: CoryTheGreat
When you have an opportunity to acquire talent like Marner, it’s not going to matter whether the player is a “insert GM name” guy or not. That’s like saying Verbeek wouldn’t draft Bedard because he’s not 6”3 220😂 If Marner was offered to Anaheim for that laughable return they’d take it and run😂


Nah, we like having depth.
Jan. 9 at 2:54 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,307
Likes: 3,045
Where's the value for a player who puts up 90+ points every season? Zegras has never really lived up to expectations and Gibson is a negative value on that contract.
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 9 at 8:28 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 786
Likes: 175
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Nah, we like having depth.


Yeah the ducks have such great depth that’s why their in a playoff spot
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit