SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Setting up for retoolfree agency at the Deadline

Created by: nutrition1223
Team: 2023-24 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 14, 2024
Published: Jan. 15, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Penguins start losing some games before the deadline putting them in a questionable spot. Dubas tries to go younger, while building up some cap space for free Agency while he does a modified retooling of the team. He I believe Pittsburgh will probably have their potential players they may move Smith, Karlsson, and Guentzel while their value would be the highest.
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Bertuzzi, Tyler
  2. Brodie, TJ
  3. Timmins, Conor
  4. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Additional team involved Ana? Nash? Chi? to retain cap for Karlsson (additional pick or prospect given up by Toronto).
2.
PIT
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Podkolzin, Vasily
  3. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Deal occurs d/t Jake agreeing and signing a long term extension w/ Van following trade.
VAN
  1. Guentzel, Jake ($3,000,000 retained)
3.
MTL
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (PIT)
  5. 2026 3rd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Even though Graves is starting to look better w/ less pressure I do miss Matheson. Would consider adding additional pick
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2026
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$79,589,342$0$865,000$3,910,658
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,985,000$1,985,000 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,450,000$2,450,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$850,000$850,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,125,000$3,125,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,375,000$5,375,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 15 at 7:56 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 525
Graves is negative value for us with a lot of terms
So the trade dies here
POJ has no value for us as well since we have a tons of LHD
Jan. 15 at 7:56 a.m.
#2
Player Model Maker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 510
Montreal says the difference between Monahan+Matheson vs Joseph+Graves is more than that.
Campabee liked this.
Jan. 15 at 8:02 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 458
Leafs dont want Karlsson lol.
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 15 at 8:09 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,552
Likes: 6,453
Drop Grave and POJ add Pens 2025 1st or Yager and it's a deal
Jan. 15 at 8:43 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
So the first two trades are about gaining resources for the future and the last trade is trading away resources for a rental and a defenseman who plays defense about as well as a block of wood?

Are you rebuilding or going all in?
Jan. 15 at 8:50 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Quoting: Campabee
Drop Grave and POJ add Pens 2025 1st or Yager and it's a deal


So to you, Matheson (a guy with 2 goals and 9 points 5v5, with the worst corsi among MTL dmen, and who ranks 144th out of 167 NHL defenseman in expected goals against) and Monahan (4 goals, 11 assists 5v5, with the worst corsi among MTL forwards, an who ranks 257th out of 269 NHL forwards in expected goals against, and has a negative shooting talent above average) are worth 2 1st round picks?

Can you defend that position?

I think combined they aren't worth a single 1st.
Jan. 15 at 9:23 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,552
Likes: 6,453
Quoting: Victor24
So to you, Matheson (a guy with 2 goals and 9 points 5v5, with the worst corsi among MTL dmen, and who ranks 144th out of 167 NHL defenseman in expected goals against) and Monahan (4 goals, 11 assists 5v5, with the worst corsi among MTL forwards, an who ranks 257th out of 269 NHL forwards in expected goals against, and has a negative shooting talent above average) are worth 2 1st round picks?

Can you defend that position?

I think combined they aren't worth a single 1st.


Well, they both play on one of the worst and most injured teams in the NHL, we are missing 4 top 9 forwards from our roster. Monahan hasn't had the opportunity to play with actual top 6 quality wingers, he has been saddled with Anderson, Gallagher, Armia and Pearson, yet is still on pace for almost 50 points, all the while spending half his time starting in the defensive zone. If he had wingers like Ehlers and Vilardi he would most likely have double or triple the 5v5 points and be well over 40 points at this point in the season, unfortunately he doesn't get those quality wingers right now. BTW the Monahan is 42 in scoring (last I checked) amongst all centers while playing with those lesser quality wingers. So yeah his XGA isn't where it should or would be if he was on a better team but context is key when evaluating players, you should try understanding that.

Matheson is largely in the same boat, he gets to play with Savard, who even though he is a top 4 D man is not nearly a 1st pairing guy. Matheson is on pace for 60 points, are you seriously telling me that a 60 point D man on one of the worst PP and 5v5 teams in the league isn't worth a 1st+?! Like come on use your brain for just one second and pay attention to the context.
Jan. 15 at 9:31 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Edited Jan. 15 at 9:37 a.m.
Quoting: Campabee
Well, they both play on one of the worst and most injured teams in the NHL, we are missing 4 top 9 forwards from our roster. Monahan hasn't had the opportunity to play with actual top 6 quality wingers, he has been saddled with Anderson, Gallagher, Armia and Pearson, yet is still on pace for almost 50 points, all the while spending half his time starting in the defensive zone. If he had wingers like Ehlers and Vilardi he would most likely have double or triple the 5v5 points and be well over 40 points at this point in the season, unfortunately he doesn't get those quality wingers right now. BTW the Monahan is 42 in scoring (last I checked) amongst all centers while playing with those lesser quality wingers. So yeah his XGA isn't where it should or would be if he was on a better team but context is key when evaluating players, you should try understanding that.

Matheson is largely in the same boat, he gets to play with Savard, who even though he is a top 4 D man is not nearly a 1st pairing guy. Matheson is on pace for 60 points, are you seriously telling me that a 60 point D man on one of the worst PP and 5v5 teams in the league isn't worth a 1st+?! Like come on use your brain for just one second and pay attention to the context.


The context is most of their points are 5v4.

Monahan is on pace for 8 goals and 22 points 5v5
Matheson is on pace for 4 goals and 18 points 5v5

Their team is bad. I hear the same thing about Granlund. He is doing great on a bad sharks team. All he needs is a playoff calibre roster and... oh wait, he had that last year and sucked.

So yeah, they are on a bad team but two guys who combined are on pace for 40 points in the most abundant level of ice time they see, is not really worth a 1st, not to mention multiple 1sts.

Also, Monahan is ranked 211th out of 269 forwards with 400+ min in points scored at 5v5.

The context is Monahan hasn't been healthy or effective since 2018.

The context is Matheson has always been a poor defender and would be a nice 3rd pair / PP QB if he wasn't paid 5MM per.
Jan. 15 at 9:40 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,552
Likes: 6,453
Quoting: Victor24
The context is most of their points are 5v4.

Monahan is on pace for 8 goals and 22 points 5v5
Matheson is on pace for 4 goals and 18 points 5v5

Their team is bad. I hear the same thing about Granlund. He is doing great on a bad sharks team. All he needs is a playoff calibre roster and... oh wait, he had that last year and sucked.

So yeah, they are on a bad team but two guys who combined are on pace for 40 points in the most abundant level of ice time they see, is not really worth a 1st, not to mention multiple 1sts.

Also, Monahan is ranked 211th out of 269 forwards with 400+ min in points scored at 5v5.

The context is Monahan hasn't been healthy or effective since 2018.

The context is Matheson has always been a poor defender and would be a nice 3rd pair / PP QB if he wasn't paid 5MM per.


LMAO, so you are trying to tell me that all games are won and lost at 5v5?! Tell me you know nothing about hockey, without saying you know nothing about hockey! Most games are won and lost on special teams, adding 2 of the top special teams players available at the deadline is worth its weight in gold
Jan. 15 at 9:58 a.m.
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,000
Likes: 3,178
Quoting: Campabee
LMAO, so you are trying to tell me that all games are won and lost at 5v5?! Tell me you know nothing about hockey, without saying you know nothing about hockey! Most games are won and lost on special teams, adding 2 of the top special teams players available at the deadline is worth its weight in gold


They aren’t good on the power play either they just get 4 minutes a night.

Montreals power play is 23rd in the league.
Victor24 and nutrition1223 liked this.
Jan. 15 at 10:03 a.m.
#11
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 1,252
Montreal won't take back a LHD with term no matter what, we have way too many really good prospects waiting for a spot to open, and your offer simply isn't worth anything close to what MTL would need in order to move a top pair D
Jan. 15 at 10:08 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Quoting: Campabee
LMAO, so you are trying to tell me that all games are won and lost at 5v5?! Tell me you know nothing about hockey, without saying you know nothing about hockey! Most games are won and lost on special teams, adding 2 of the top special teams players available at the deadline is worth its weight in gold


Well let's see...
9 of the top 15 teams in PP % made the playoffs last year (60%)

14 of the top 15 teams in even strength goals made the playoffs last year (93%)

10 of the top 15 teams in PP % made the playoffs two years ago (67%)

14 of the top 15 teams in even strength goals made the playoffs two years ago (93%)

Vegas won last year with the 5th best PP in the playoffs and the best 5v5.

Col was the best at both the year before.

So it seems teams winning the battle 5v5 has more of an impact that winning 5v4. Which makes sense since the average team had 400 minutes on the PP last year and 4,000 minutes at 5v5.

Now, I do understand what you're saying in that a time that represents 10% of the ice time makes up 20% of the goals (so it has a higher representation) but it is still only 20% of the goals. 75% are 5v5, which makes it much more important.
nutrition1223 liked this.
Jan. 15 at 10:18 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Quoting: SMH
Montreal won't take back a LHD with term no matter what, we have way too many really good prospects waiting for a spot to open, and your offer simply isn't worth anything close to what MTL would need in order to move a top pair D


Matheson is the top pair dman on MTL. On a good team, he is a 3rd pair. Except he's paid like a 2nd pair. So...
Jan. 15 at 10:44 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,654
Likes: 1,174
Canucks cant afford Jake long term without loosing some key players for next year.I dont think we would do this.Its alot to give up.(hes 100%) worth it.but not a fit money wise.IMHO.
Victor24 liked this.
Jan. 15 at 10:49 a.m.
#15
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 1,252
Quoting: Victor24
Matheson is the top pair dman on MTL. On a good team, he is a 3rd pair. Except he's paid like a 2nd pair. So...


Sure
Jan. 15 at 11:06 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Quoting: SMH
Sure


I'm just saying he is an oddity. A good PP QB who is paid like a 2nd pair guy but is really a 3rd pair guy.
nutrition1223 liked this.
Jan. 15 at 11:08 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks cant afford Jake long term without loosing some key players for next year.I dont think we would do this.Its alot to give up.(hes 100%) worth it.but not a fit money wise.IMHO.


They can but I don't know if they want to. They would have to trade Garland.
nutrition1223 and remowilliams liked this.
Jan. 15 at 3:06 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 64
Likes: 22
Quoting: Victor24
So the first two trades are about gaining resources for the future and the last trade is trading away resources for a rental and a defenseman who plays defense about as well as a block of wood?

Are you rebuilding or going all in?


I just didn't feel the roster was complete so I made the last trade. I do agree. I was between that trade or a trade to bring Fleury back. I should have stopped at the 2 trades which landed us the picks prospects and cap space.
Victor24 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll