probably the closest comp in terms of value. best player on one of the best teams in the league.

pastrnak re-signed as a 27 yr UFA, not a 25 year old RFA. so not perfect.

pastrnak production, especially goals, is always better than petey's but positional value and two play probably evens out total on ice value.

same age at time of re-signing

lower income tax state compared to vancouver, would need to increase by about 7.5% to get comparable net income

Aho has never had a 100 point season, petey has one last year plus on pace for one this year.

positional and two play comparable.

represents a low floor for salary

2.5 years older at the time of contract start

hart trophy winner, stanley cup winner, ufa, probably top 2 player in the nhl

petey would have a very hard time justifying getting paid similar to nate

1 year age different at time of contract start

both players are 90-100 point calibre

same position

high two-way value, although barkov more accomplished from a selke and playoff perspective

significant difference in tax and max cap hit at time of contract start. petey would need approximately $12 million per season to get similar net income after adjusting for cap increase

same age at time of re-signing, same position, similar production, point a better goal scorer petey more total points

similar to barkov, petey would need about $2 million more to offset income tax and cap increase

matthews obviously a class of his own. no way petey can justify 13 million if matthews settled for 13.25


for nylander, probably about right. similar production this year. maybe give petey a slight bump due to positional value and being a bit younger