SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying to find a Zegras trade that de-risks the trade for Anaheim

Created by: jonh514
Team: 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2024
Published: Feb. 7, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. Zegras, Trevor
Additional Details:
Habs get a player who is undeniably a top 6 forward
ANA
  1. Farrell, Sean
  2. 2024 1st round pick (MTL)
  3. 2026 2nd round pick (MTL)
Additional Details:
1st pick is 6-10 OA which responds to the higher-end talent of Zegras

Farrell is a smaller body skill forward. He'll never be Zegras, but with the right patience he can turn into a heck of a middle 6 player. Just to clarify, he's my favorite Rocket forward and I think his NHL career is guaranteed, while I am not sure about a guy like Roy.

2nd round pick in 2026 is really to offset the risk that neither of these players work out, which I think is a very low risk

Comparable I am using is Kevin Fiala vs Brock Faber (when he was in junior and still a "maybe") and a late 1st.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$83,500,000$81,500,416$1,170,000$3,977,500$1,999,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,925,000$1,925,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$828,333$828,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 7 at 8:21 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 844
Likes: 180
That trade makes sense, but I wouldn’t do it until the draft. By then, we’ll know where we stand with the rank of our selection and which players would be available. I think if players like Demidov or Lindstrom are still available when we pick, then we keep the pick. If the elite offensive talent is gone, then I’d consider this dral.
jonh514 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 8:45 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: MONSTER1974
That trade makes sense, but I wouldn’t do it until the draft. By then, we’ll know where we stand with the rank of our selection and which players would be available. I think if players like Demidov or Lindstrom are still available when we pick, then we keep the pick. If the elite offensive talent is gone, then I’d consider this dral.


I am assuming they go 2-4...
Feb. 7 at 9:32 a.m.
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,226
Likes: 7,008
de-risking would be including an NHL player, not an AHL question mark.
jonh514 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 9:40 a.m.
#4
I post sometimes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,777
Likes: 1,691
I don't know - the talent in that top 7 is very good! But I admit that instead of getting Helenius or Catton, I would go for Zegras.
jonh514 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 9:41 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: Bcarlo25
de-risking would be including an NHL player, not an AHL question mark.


I think it's a fair criticism, but I would counter with 3 points:

1) This was not the case with the Fiala deal. Faber was a risky prospect, and this is a vast overpayment on that deal.

2) I added a 2nd to counter-balance the possibility that Farrell doesn't make it.

3) Caufield, Suzuki, and Slaf are off limits and there are no other forwards of interest currently on the Habs (take your pick if you find one!) Do you want a defenseman instead? Xhekaj, Harris, Struble, Barron are all available, but we may need to drop the 2nd.
Feb. 7 at 9:42 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: MTLaveragefan
I don't know - the talent in that top 7 is very good! But I admit that instead of getting Helenius or Catton, I would go for Zegras.


Zegras has had 2 seasons like the one Caufield is "currently" having... and with worse linemates. Think about that!
Feb. 7 at 9:56 a.m.
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,226
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: jonh514
I think it's a fair criticism, but I would counter with 3 points:

1) This was not the case with the Fiala deal. Faber was a risky prospect, and this is a vast overpayment on that deal.

2) I added a 2nd to counter-balance the possibility that Farrell doesn't make it.

3) Caufield, Suzuki, and Slaf are off limits and there are no other forwards of interest currently on the Habs (take your pick if you find one!) Do you want a defenseman instead? Xhekaj, Harris, Struble, Barron are all available, but we may need to drop the 2nd.


Was "de-risking," cited in the Fiala trade? I get the sense that for the most part, that isn't really important to teams. They know they're getting lottery tickets.

Honestly I don't think Zegras is very good. I would stay away, but if you're dead set on trying to deal for him I would just be going with winnipegs pick, montreals 2nd, and some middle prospect.
Feb. 7 at 10:17 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Was "de-risking," cited in the Fiala trade? I get the sense that for the most part, that isn't really important to teams. They know they're getting lottery tickets.

Honestly I don't think Zegras is very good. I would stay away, but if you're dead set on trying to deal for him I would just be going with winnipegs pick, montreals 2nd, and some middle prospect.


He IS very good.
CHAR liked this.
Feb. 7 at 10:30 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 737
Quoting: jonh514
I think it's a fair criticism, but I would counter with 3 points:

1) This was not the case with the Fiala deal. Faber was a risky prospect, and this is a vast overpayment on that deal.


In the Fiala trade Minnesota was completely hamstrung by their cap situation. They a) couldn't afford to pay Fiala who needed a new contract and b) couldn't afford to take back any other NHL salary in return. Their leverage to negotiate a trade was greatly reduced by these things.

Zegras has a reasonable contract and the Ducks have more cap space than almost any one in the league. Your comparable falls apart some what in my mind.
Feb. 7 at 10:34 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 737
Quoting: Bcarlo25

Honestly I don't think Zegras is very good. I would stay away, but if you're dead set on trying to deal for him I would just be going with winnipegs pick, montreals 2nd, and some middle prospect.


That doesn't get you Zegras though. In the 2019 draft class he ranks 6th in games played, 3rd in points and 5th in goals scored. And that's with this season being a total write off. The kid has elite talent and just needs a good coach and good team structure to maximize his strengths.
Feb. 7 at 10:36 a.m.
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,226
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: CHAR
That doesn't get you Zegras though. In the 2019 draft class he ranks 6th in games played, 3rd in points and 5th in goals scored. And that's with this season being a total write off. The kid has elite talent and just needs a good coach and good team structure to maximize his strengths.


I think not getting Zegras would be a good thing. I think he's one-dimensional, and won't be contributing to a winning hockey team without a major change to his game.
Feb. 7 at 10:36 a.m.
#12
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,226
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: jonh514
He IS very good.


nah. not really. one trick pony and the trick isn't special. i wouldn't want him on my team.
Feb. 7 at 11:21 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: CHAR
In the Fiala trade Minnesota was completely hamstrung by their cap situation. They a) couldn't afford to pay Fiala who needed a new contract and b) couldn't afford to take back any other NHL salary in return. Their leverage to negotiate a trade was greatly reduced by these things.

Zegras has a reasonable contract and the Ducks have more cap space than almost any one in the league. Your comparable falls apart some what in my mind.


Except that this is a vast overpayment on that deal.

Who was traded in recent years on pure talent that is a better comparable?
Feb. 7 at 11:38 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 1,774
Change Farrell to Beck, Ducks agree this doesn’t happen until the draft and only if one of Verbeek’s ‘my guys’ are available. My guess is that that’d be Levshunov/Lindstrom
jonh514 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 11:43 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: Jded
Change Farrell to Beck, Ducks agree this doesn’t happen until the draft and only if one of Verbeek’s ‘my guys’ are available. My guess is that that’d be Levshunov/Lindstrom


Farrell is gonna be a better NHL player than Beck. Are you sure?

Habs accept the compromise in my opinion, though I suggest draft Lindstrom if available.
Jded liked this.
Feb. 7 at 12:08 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 1,774
Quoting: jonh514
Farrell is gonna be a better NHL player than Beck. Are you sure?

Habs accept the compromise in my opinion, though I suggest draft Lindstrom if available.


Admittedly, I haven’t seen much of either. But just knowing Verbeek, the 5’9 forward will not be preferred

Also, kudos on actually putting together a thoughtful offer here
Feb. 7 at 2:01 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 737
Quoting: jonh514
Except that this is a vast overpayment on that deal.


"Vast" is a stretch. With Hindsight we know now that Faber is getting plenty of Calder talk in the same year that Connor Bedard is a rookie. But even at the time of the trade he was a NCAA kid chosen to represent the US at the Olympics. He was a top notch prospect then as much as he is today.

Farrell is "meh". You clearly like him. I like him a lot less. A 2nd round pick three drafts from now is also a long way off to get excited about.

I think the overall offer here is good enough to strongly consider, but I really don't think you are blowing the Ducks doors off.
jonh514 liked this.
Feb. 7 at 2:04 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 7,001
Likes: 3,055
Quoting: CHAR
"Vast" is a stretch. With Hindsight we know now that Faber is getting plenty of Calder talk in the same year that Connor Bedard is a rookie. But even at the time of the trade he was a NCAA kid chosen to represent the US at the Olympics. He was a top notch prospect then as much as he is today.

Farrell is "meh". You clearly like him. I like him a lot less. A 2nd round pick three drafts from now is also a long way off to get excited about.

I think the overall offer here is good enough to strongly consider, but I really don't think you are blowing the Ducks doors off.


Then the offer sounds right! A deal is supposed to be painful for both sides, not an obvious win for one or the other.
CHAR liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll