SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The move heard around the world

Created by: Somms
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 16, 2024
Published: Feb. 16, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
EDM
  1. Jenner, Boone ($1,875,000 retained)
  2. Severson, Damon ($1,250,000 retained)
CBJ
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Ceci, Cody
  4. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
  6. 2026 1st round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$82,380,000$850,000$5,050,000$1,120,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 16 at 9:03 p.m.
#1
boltsfan71
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 633
Lol
Feb. 16 at 9:05 p.m.
#2
BEDSY
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 143
Likes: 41
CBJ accepts
Feb. 16 at 10:38 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 976
Likes: 835
Quoting: MunchOnACookie
CBJ accepts


ummmm, no tf they don't?

2 of the 3 1sts put you at a net even for taking on Campbell's deal.
Bourgaut, the last 1, and Ceci maybe are about Jenner, but definitely not with retention

And then Severson, who they just signed for 8 years. Incredibly bad optics to make that trade, even if he's been disappointing. But that's DEFINITELY not getting retention. 7 more years of retention is insane.
SK101, dk325, CaseyFlyman and 3 others liked this.
Feb. 16 at 10:56 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,151
Likes: 2,830
Quoting: MunchOnACookie
CBJ accepts


Lol not a chance
Feb. 17 at 10:03 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 1,713
Quoting: Trevor31lv
ummmm, no tf they don't?

2 of the 3 1sts put you at a net even for taking on Campbell's deal.
Bourgaut, the last 1, and Ceci maybe are about Jenner, but definitely not with retention

And then Severson, who they just signed for 8 years. Incredibly bad optics to make that trade, even if he's been disappointing. But that's DEFINITELY not getting retention. 7 more years of retention is insane.


I'd argue it doesn't cost quite one first to move Campbell's deal, since EDM buying him out is a legitimate option in the offseason (and certainly better than parting with 2 1sts). But it doesn't change the fact that it's a quick no.

There's absolutely zero chance, no scenario, where a team trades and retains on 6 years of a 7 year deal they just signed.
Feb. 17 at 5:42 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 976
Likes: 835
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
I'd argue it doesn't cost quite one first to move Campbell's deal, since EDM buying him out is a legitimate option in the offseason (and certainly better than parting with 2 1sts). But it doesn't change the fact that it's a quick no.

There's absolutely zero chance, no scenario, where a team trades and retains on 6 years of a 7 year deal they just signed.


Even worse, it's 7 of 8 cause they traded that 4th to get his rights.

Your point about Campbell is fair, but I think it's really only applicable to Edmonton's POV. Like, it only makes sense to trade so much to get out of him since they can also buy out. I'd argue the cost for another team to take it on willingly and either buy out themselves or let it run out is much higher and closer to the 2 1sts I said though, because they're willingly hamstringing themselves at that point, and the cost for that is much higher than the cost the team already in the situation will pay to get out, if that makes sense.
Feb. 18 at 1:05 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 1,713
Quoting: Trevor31lv
Even worse, it's 7 of 8 cause they traded that 4th to get his rights.

Your point about Campbell is fair, but I think it's really only applicable to Edmonton's POV. Like, it only makes sense to trade so much to get out of him since they can also buy out. I'd argue the cost for another team to take it on willingly and either buy out themselves or let it run out is much higher and closer to the 2 1sts I said though, because they're willingly hamstringing themselves at that point, and the cost for that is much higher than the cost the team already in the situation will pay to get out, if that makes sense.


My bad there, yeah 7/8 years retaining is unthinkable.

And yeah, that makes sense for Campbell. It really depends on the team, if Montreal (a team with deep pockets and still a year or two away from really competing) was willing to take him on and buy him out, it might be worth it to them for a first. For a team like Columbus, a team that's got shallow pockets and arguably delusions of competing now....the price to do that would be a couple of firsts. For EDM, it's opportunity cost. Those firsts are critical for upgrading other parts of the roster for each run, so they're not going to spend such a significant asset when the buyout option is more attractive.
Trevor31lv liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll