SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Edmonton Oilers

Created by: tahltan24
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 25, 2024
Published: Feb. 25, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel ($2,000,000 retained)
2.
EDM
NSH
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Tullio, Tyler
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  4. 2024 6th round pick (NSH)
  5. 2025 3rd round pick (EDM)
3.
EDM
SJS
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
4.
5.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$82,954,167$850,000$975,000$545,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,275,000$1,275,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 25 at 1:25 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 1,420
Yuck
Feb. 25 at 1:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 933
Quoting: AC14
Yuck


Stop it already. You are making Blues fans look foolish. This is a good offer. Can Blues do better? Probably. But I would take this if best they got this year. Won’t get this next year for him.
Feb. 25 at 1:43 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 768
Likes: 502
I think AZ would rather have a late pick, but maybe they'd consider that if they like Niemalainen. They do like size on the back end and up the middle.
Feb. 25 at 2:08 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 100
Likes: 19
Sharks hangup
Feb. 25 at 2:30 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,566
Likes: 11,949
Why would Anaheim want Janmark??

We much rather keep Carrick
OldNYIfan liked this.
Feb. 25 at 2:32 p.m.
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,499
Likes: 25,389
Carrick can play RW better than Janmark and he's more familiar with the Ducks, so I don't see any point in this UFA swap.
Feb. 25 at 2:41 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1,006
That barely enough to dump campbell let alone acquire Duclair and blackwood
Feb. 25 at 2:43 p.m.
#8
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: noted
Stop it already. You are making Blues fans look foolish. This is a good offer. Can Blues do better? Probably. But I would take this if best they got this year. Won’t get this next year for him.


I second this! This offer can definitely get beat and I would like Bourgult over Lavoie but if we got this for Buch I would be down

And if need be we can flip Foegole for futures too
noted liked this.
Feb. 25 at 3:01 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 1,420
Quoting: noted
Stop it already. You are making Blues fans look foolish. This is a good offer. Can Blues do better? Probably. But I would take this if best they got this year. Won’t get this next year for him.


Good offer? Retaining 2m alone for next season is a problem that's going to be hard to overcome. Broberg has a full season of games under his belt and can't stay at the NHL level, on a team that has had alot of issues defensively. Foegle isn't a bad player. Lavoie is a decent prospect. But i find it really hard to trust any Edmonton prospect given they all fit the same profile and generally don't make much of an impact at the NHL level, like they have for years.

Either you view Broberg as an 8th overall pick and still holding value, or you view Lavoie alot higher than I do. But there's a long list of these guys Edmonton are drafting who are big bodies who can skate but don't ever really pan out. I would rather avoid that as we have had our fill with Paajarvii.

Certainly not retaining for that.
Feb. 25 at 3:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 933
Quoting: AC14
Good offer? Retaining 2m alone for next season is a problem that's going to be hard to overcome. Broberg has a full season of games under his belt and can't stay at the NHL level, on a team that has had alot of issues defensively. Foegle isn't a bad player. Lavoie is a decent prospect. But i find it really hard to trust any Edmonton prospect given they all fit the same profile and generally don't make much of an impact at the NHL level, like they have for years.

Either you view Broberg as an 8th overall pick and still holding value, or you view Lavoie alot higher than I do. But there's a long list of these guys Edmonton are drafting who are big bodies who can skate but don't ever really pan out. I would rather avoid that as we have had our fill with Paajarvii.

Certainly not retaining for that.


Look at the Blues cap space next year - they can easily retain for 1 year. Broberg has potential to be top pairing partner for a Parayko they desperately lack. I think the Blues could do better but by no means is this a bad offer
Feb. 25 at 3:18 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 1,420
Quoting: noted
Look at the Blues cap space next year - they can easily retain for 1 year. Broberg has potential to be top pairing partner for a Parayko they desperately lack. I think the Blues could do better but by no means is this a bad offer


What aside from draft position has indicated you that Broberg has a good chance to be a top pairing defenseman in the NHL?
Feb. 25 at 3:26 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 549
Likes: 236
Quoting: AC14
What aside from draft position has indicated you that Broberg has a good chance to be a top pairing defenseman in the NHL?


Just to preface this with, I think a trade of 2 firsts, Akey and Janmark for Buch (50%) and Sundqvist may hit your needs in STL more, not saying that 100% though.

Broberg is an NHL defensemen who is unfortunately behind Nurse and Ekholm who are just undoubtedly better.
We used to play him on the 3rd pair but it was pointless to give him ~10mins a night when he can develop in the AHL on the top pair.

IDK what STL is looking like on the LH side for Dmen prospects, but Broberg is still easily top 4 potential.
Feb. 25 at 3:29 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 672
Likes: 256
Quoting: AC14
What aside from draft position has indicated you that Broberg has a good chance to be a top pairing defenseman in the NHL?


I gotta agree with this. If Broberg is the center piece I’m terrified. Sure maybe he figures it all out and turns into a top pair but he’s looked lost this year without a lot of responsibility
Feb. 25 at 3:30 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 1,420
Quoting: PurpleHippo
Just to preface this with, I think a trade of 2 firsts, Akey and Janmark for Buch (50%) and Sundqvist may hit your needs in STL more, not saying that 100% though.

Broberg is an NHL defensemen who is unfortunately behind Nurse and Ekholm who are just undoubtedly better.
We used to play him on the 3rd pair but it was pointless to give him ~10mins a night when he can develop in the AHL on the top pair.

IDK what STL is looking like on the LH side for Dmen prospects, but Broberg is still easily top 4 potential.


It does, I'm not sure if St. Louis would move Sunny but it's alot better on the track of what I personally believe they'd be looking for.

I understand that he was behind both Nurse and Ekholm, but I think you can understand the sentiment of not trusting many if any of Edmonton's prospects given the recent past. I believe Broberg is an NHL defenseman to a degree, but I think it's hard to imagine him being an impactful top 4 defenseman. A player in a similar situation in Kravstov last season was traded for a 7th and a contract. He's just played enough games at the NHL level it's hard not to see the immense risk that he probably isn't anything more than a bottom pairing guy.
Feb. 25 at 3:53 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 549
Likes: 236
Quoting: AC14
It does, I'm not sure if St. Louis would move Sunny but it's alot better on the track of what I personally believe they'd be looking for.

I understand that he was behind both Nurse and Ekholm, but I think you can understand the sentiment of not trusting many if any of Edmonton's prospects given the recent past. I believe Broberg is an NHL defenseman to a degree, but I think it's hard to imagine him being an impactful top 4 defenseman. A player in a similar situation in Kravstov last season was traded for a 7th and a contract. He's just played enough games at the NHL level it's hard not to see the immense risk that he probably isn't anything more than a bottom pairing guy.


Most of that bolded sentiment comes due to our 2021 draft where we moved back from Wallstedt to XB, who isn't panning out well enough to justify that move.
Otherwise we have done well:
Our 5 most recent drafts we got: Bouchard, Broberg, Holloway, Schaefer in the first.
Bouchard and Holloway are both doing well in the NHL, Holloway obvs doesnt have great stats to support that but he fits a role we need.
In the second we got: Mcleod, Rodrigue, Lavoie, Savioe and Akey; 3 of which look like easy NHL players and 1 (Lavoie) is a decent 13th forward.
We also were a competitive team throughout that, so our picks have generally been later (though yes, Broberg was #8), altogether we have been fairly solid drafting given our position.
That is besides the point though so TLDR: We have done alright in recent drafts.

Broberg is still a great Dman who showed he is good at the NHL level in the little time he's been up with us, his situation is just unfortunate for him because we traded for a much better LHD to fill our top four who took his spot.
On a team where he could get ~18 mins a night he could flurish, which is why Holland is having such a difficult time letting him go.
Feb. 25 at 8:14 p.m.
#16
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Wow a bunch of garbage for Pavel Buchnevich, Detroit blows away that crap offer.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll