SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Created by: WranglerWranglin
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 1, 2024
Published: Mar. 1, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
NJD
  1. Hanifin, Noah ($2,475,000 retained)
  2. Markström, Jacob
2.
CGY
  1. Whitecloud, Zach
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew ($1,800,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$74,759,166$0$1,077,500$8,740,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 1 at 3:46 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,520
Likes: 19,666
Flames decline the Devils trade. Vegas isn't trading Whitecloud
Mar. 1 at 3:48 p.m.
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,987
Likes: 3,171
I'd expect that Devils pass without retention on markstrom (also NJD doesn't need retention on Hanifin).

Picks are going the wrong way in a Mangiapane for Whitecloud swap
Mar. 1 at 3:50 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,402
Likes: 18,428
Change the 1st to a 2nd and 3rd on NJD trade. Or add retention to Markstrom.
Mar. 1 at 3:54 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: dgibb10
I'd expect that Devils pass without retention on markstrom (also NJD doesn't need retention on Hanifin).

Picks are going the wrong way in a Mangiapane for Whitecloud swap


https://x.com/PierreVLeBrun/status/1763661589788434506?s=20

We know you take the media as gospel so now we have to assume there's no retention.
Mar. 1 at 3:55 p.m.
#5
Flames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 359
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Change the 1st to a 2nd and 3rd on NJD trade. Or add retention to Markstrom.


Your GM just came out saying he'll make a trade without retention so no either add the first or we just simply keep Markstrom.
Mar. 1 at 3:55 p.m.
#6
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,987
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
https://x.com/PierreVLeBrun/status/1763661589788434506?s=20

We know you take the media as gospel so now we have to assume there's no retention.


Yep, NJD is WILLING to take him without retention. Offer goes down tho.
Mar. 1 at 3:56 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: dgibb10
Yep, NJD is WILLING to take him without retention. Offer goes down tho.


But the media said so!!!! And we have to follow what's most dramatic right?!
Mar. 1 at 3:57 p.m.
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,987
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
But the media said so!!!! And we have to follow what's most dramatic right?!


No, we follow common sense. No retention is no longer a deal breaker.

Markstrom is upset at ownership and/or the front office. (This is what MARKSTROM SAID)
Mar. 1 at 4:08 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: dgibb10
No, we follow common sense. No retention is no longer a deal breaker.

Markstrom is upset at ownership and/or the front office. (This is what MARKSTROM SAID)


He said "up top" If you quote what he said then quote what he said.
Mar. 1 at 4:10 p.m.
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,987
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
He said "up top" If you quote what he said then quote what he said.


Again, equating up top to be "sources from new jersey" is either being intentionally obtuse, or maybe english isn't your first language, in which case I apologize. The context is quite clear here
Mar. 1 at 4:13 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: dgibb10
Again, equating up top to be "sources from new jersey" is either being intentionally obtuse, or maybe english isn't your first language, in which case I apologize. The context is quite clear here


You're not even in the right conversation.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll