SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If we all out sell

Created by: xercuses
Team: 2023-24 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 5, 2024
Published: Mar. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Move Leddy and Hayes in the offseason retained
Trades
1.
STL
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (FLA)
Additional Details:
Team doesnt matter
FLA
  1. Scandella, Marco ($1,637,500 retained)
2.
STL
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Team doesnt matter
BOS
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi ($1,600,000 retained)
3.
STL
  1. Podkolzin, Vasily
  2. Willander, Tom [Reserve List]
  3. 2025 1st round pick (VAN)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
more expensive because theres no 24 first
4.
STL
  1. 2024 7th round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Anyone team doesnt matter
PIT
  1. Vrána, Jakub ($1,312,500 retained)
5.
STL
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Timmins, Conor
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
  4. 2026 3rd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the STL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$71,041,012$20,000$1,250,000$12,458,988
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$816,667$816,667
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$883,750$883,750
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 5 at 9:52 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Did Buchnevich instantly become a 120 point player? That return is bonkers.
Mar. 5 at 9:53 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Lancebmx
Did Buchnevich instantly become a 120 point player? That return is bonkers.


I mean its a little high but theres no 24 first

I could get rid of the 2nd though
Mar. 5 at 10:02 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 489
Likes: 243
Quoting: xercuses
I mean its a little high but theres no 24 first

I could get rid of the 2nd though


I'd keep the 2nd on there, but retention on Buch
Don't mind the return though. I'd say pretty fair
Mar. 5 at 10:02 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Quoting: xercuses
I mean its a little high but theres no 24 first

I could get rid of the 2nd though


Maybe take out Willander...... That's like the value of 4+ 1sts.
Mar. 5 at 10:02 a.m.
#5
Avid Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 624
Likes: 309
Quoting: xercuses
I mean its a little high but theres no 24 first

I could get rid of the 2nd though


Honestly a 2025 from Van is probably for the best. We are 1 or 2 injuries (see Demko previous 2 years) away from being back to a top 10 pick. Our 2024 pick barring losing out is going to be in the 24+ range. While yes 1 more year of development. Also Allvin doesn't want to move Podkolzin or Willander.
Mar. 5 at 10:08 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 1,268
Quoting: Lancebmx
Did Buchnevich instantly become a 120 point player? That return is bonkers.


Ya didn’t get that memo?
Mar. 5 at 10:10 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 489
Likes: 243
Quoting: Lancebmx
Maybe take out Willander...... That's like the value of 4+ 1sts.


When did Willander become Cale Makar?
Mar. 5 at 10:14 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 984
Likes: 418
Quoting: Lancebmx
Maybe take out Willander...... That's like the value of 4+ 1sts.



I don't think a Buch to Van trade can happen without Willander. Granted this trade is still a bit much.

I would do Willander + 25 1st for Buch

I understand that Vancouver won't want to move Willander, which why none of this happens.
Mar. 5 at 10:15 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 6,391
Willander isnt available
Warpbox liked this.
Mar. 5 at 10:20 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Lancebmx
Maybe take out Willander...... That's like the value of 4+ 1sts.


He’s non negotiable
mokumboi liked this.
Mar. 5 at 10:22 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 2,234
Quoting: xercuses
He’s non negotiable


Then Buchnevich will not be a Canuck
Mar. 5 at 10:24 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: Warpbox
Then Buchnevich will not be a Canuck


That’s perfectly fine
mokumboi liked this.
Mar. 5 at 10:37 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Quoting: StDetroitBlueWings
When did Willander become Cale Makar?


When did Buchnevich become McDavid? Willander was just drafted 11th overall, they wouldn't trade him 1 for 1 for Buchnevich. I would maybe look at some comparable trades to gauge value.
Mar. 5 at 10:41 a.m.
#14
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,295
Likes: 11,366
Quoting: Lancebmx
Maybe take out Willander...... That's like the value of 4+ 1sts.


Ehh no it's not.
Mar. 5 at 10:43 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Quoting: mokumboi
Ehh no it's not.


Debatable but either way, Buch isn't worth this much.
Mar. 5 at 10:47 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 489
Likes: 243
Quoting: Lancebmx
When did Buchnevich become McDavid? Willander was just drafted 11th overall, they wouldn't trade him 1 for 1 for Buchnevich. I would maybe look at some comparable trades to gauge value.


Just because he was drafted 11 OA you think he's all of a sudden the next Cale Makar?

When did anyone ever say Buch was McDavid? Did you not see what Lindholm got in return via trade?
Let me remind you: a first, good roster player (Kuz), a good prospect Vancouver was high on plus another prospect

Buch is better than Lindholm, he's a year younger, and you get him for two playoff runs (plus next season) at presumably under 3 mil for a PPG player
That EASILY demands more than what Lindholm got.

Maybe you just need a reality check and then some if you're that delusional thinking they wouldn't do Willander 1 for 1... Blues would laugh at that offer
mokumboi liked this.
Mar. 5 at 10:51 a.m.
#17
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,295
Likes: 11,366
Quoting: Lancebmx
When did Buchnevich become McDavid? Willander was just drafted 11th overall, they wouldn't trade him 1 for 1 for Buchnevich. I would maybe look at some comparable trades to gauge value.


Comparables! tears of joy Okay, shoot us a ripe comparable for a Buch trade. I'm all ears, open arms.
Mar. 5 at 10:52 a.m.
#18
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,295
Likes: 11,366
Quoting: Lancebmx
Debatable but either way, Buch isn't worth this much.


Buch's worth is right in this range. Willander is nowhere near four 1sts+. Mayyyybe half that. At absolute theoretical most.
Mar. 5 at 11:15 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Quoting: StDetroitBlueWings
Just because he was drafted 11 OA you think he's all of a sudden the next Cale Makar?

When did anyone ever say Buch was McDavid? Did you not see what Lindholm got in return via trade?
Let me remind you: a first, good roster player (Kuz), a good prospect Vancouver was high on plus another prospect

Buch is better than Lindholm, he's a year younger, and you get him for two playoff runs (plus next season) at presumably under 3 mil for a PPG player
That EASILY demands more than what Lindholm got.

Maybe you just need a reality check and then some if you're that delusional thinking they wouldn't do Willander 1 for 1... Blues would laugh at that offer


Never said anything about Cale Makar, you made that ridiculous comparable hence why I made the ridiculous McDavid one. Willander is Vancouver's top defense prospect, who they just drafted, fills an organizational need and has the potential to be a top pairing defenseman for them.
Lindholm trade...... A good roster player? Where? Kuzmenko was a consistent healthy scratch making 5.5M a year. He was sent for cap purposes and for Calgary to take a chance on. Jurmo probably never makes it at the NHL level. Hunter is a big maybe as well. He's an all offense defensemen who was just drafted in the third round. He doesn't have anymore value than the pick they used on him. Buch being better all around player than Lindholm is highly debatable too. He is the better offensive player but his play away from the puck isn't nearly as good, plus Lindholm plays centre which is greatly more valuable. Also the couple month younger Buchnevich has a cap hit of 5.8M, don't know how that's less than 3? Also don't forget that Buchnevich makes more than his cap hit, doesn't help things.

Would you trade Dvorsky + 2025 1st + Neighbours for Mittelstadt or Fiala? That would be a pretty close comparable to this trade.

Another comparable you could look at was the Meier trade.
mv21227 liked this.
Mar. 5 at 11:17 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Quoting: mokumboi
Buch's worth is right in this range. Willander is nowhere near four 1sts+. Mayyyybe half that. At absolute theoretical most.


Willander 4 1sts? Nooo the trade posted 4+ 1sts value.

A recent trade comp I can think of is Meier. Not going to bother wasting my time trying to find any.
Mar. 5 at 11:22 a.m.
#21
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,295
Likes: 11,366
Quoting: Lancebmx
Willander 4 1sts? Nooo the trade posted 4+ 1sts value.

A recent trade comp I can think of is Meier. Not going to bother wasting my time trying to find any.


Ahhhhhhhhh. Gotcha. I misread that. Could be taken in two ways, and I grabbed the wrong one.

Meier is not a trade comp, the Blues are not in an epic teardown rebuild shipping big assets everywhere.
Mar. 5 at 11:30 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,524
Likes: 8,159
Quoting: mokumboi
Ahhhhhhhhh. Gotcha. I misread that. Could be taken in two ways, and I grabbed the wrong one.

Meier is not a trade comp, the Blues are not in an epic teardown rebuild shipping big assets everywhere.


Equivalent value player in my opinion. Could look at Fiala as well to the Kings but both of those players were younger. To find an exact trade comp of a fringe playoff team looking to trade a sub-ppg winger with similar contract and age would be damn near impossible.
Mar. 5 at 11:44 a.m.
#23
SkateOrDie
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 352
why would the penguins take on a cap dump rental for nothing...... or frankly any other team?
Mar. 5 at 12:10 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
why would the penguins take on a cap dump rental for nothing...... or frankly any other team?


Blues can just keep him bro
Idc
Mar. 5 at 12:11 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 489
Likes: 243
Quoting: Lancebmx
Never said anything about Cale Makar, you made that ridiculous comparable hence why I made the ridiculous McDavid one. Willander is Vancouver's top defense prospect, who they just drafted, fills an organizational need and has the potential to be a top pairing defenseman for them.
Lindholm trade...... A good roster player? Where? Kuzmenko was a consistent healthy scratch making 5.5M a year. He was sent for cap purposes and for Calgary to take a chance on. Jurmo probably never makes it at the NHL level. Hunter is a big maybe as well. He's an all offense defensemen who was just drafted in the third round. He doesn't have anymore value than the pick they used on him. Buch being better all around player than Lindholm is highly debatable too. He is the better offensive player but his play away from the puck isn't nearly as good, plus Lindholm plays centre which is greatly more valuable. Also the couple month younger Buchnevich has a cap hit of 5.8M, don't know how that's less than 3? Also don't forget that Buchnevich makes more than his cap hit, doesn't help things.

Would you trade Dvorsky + 2025 1st + Neighbours for Mittelstadt or Fiala? That would be a pretty close comparable to this trade.

Another comparable you could look at was the Meier trade.


You just can't admit you're wrong claiming that Willander is worth 4 1sts. But it's like arguing with a tree stump at this point.

And the Meier trade is a basis, yes. But not a "guideline" to other trades

You can't really just look at a somewhat similar trade and say that it needs to follow a "structure"

Teams have different needs and goals. SJ was a teardown. That's not what the goal is here in STL.

And under 3 mil is with retention, which to get a quality package we would be more than willing to do.

Want a premium asset? Give up premium assets. If not? Just shut your mouth ya Jabroni
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll