SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason Series - FLAMES

Created by: Cabbie91
Team: 2024-25 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 19, 2024
Published: Mar. 19, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
- Draft Tij Iginla, MIchael Hage and Cole Hutson
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$900,000
1$900,000
2$890,000
1$890,000
2$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
Trades
CGY
  1. Siegenthaler, Jonas
  2. Stillman, Chase
  3. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob ($3,000,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$73,986,666$0$1,062,500$13,513,334

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$823,333$823,333
LD
RFA - 1
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 19 at 1:19 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 1,443
Cant see the Devils moving Siegenthaler in any move
Mar. 19 at 1:28 p.m.
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,143
Devils aren't moving a top 10 pick for Markstrom, let alone adding significantly
Mar. 19 at 1:30 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 346
Seems like a lot for Marky. Hage seems like a reach at 9 or 12 to me.
Mar. 19 at 1:39 p.m.
#4
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,325
Horrible trade for NJD. Also, didn't CGY ownership already block Conroy from trading Markstrom with significant retention? Not sure why they would allow his to be traded in the offseason at 50% retained if they just blocked something similar at the deadline.
Mar. 19 at 1:41 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 346
Quoting: jfkst1
Horrible trade for NJD. Also, didn't CGY ownership already block Conroy from trading Markstrom with significant retention? Not sure why they would allow his to be traded in the offseason at 50% retained if they just blocked something similar at the deadline.


I think it was blocked because ownership wanted to stay in the play off hunt.
Mar. 19 at 1:46 p.m.
#6
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,325
Quoting: Shaun80
I think it was blocked because ownership wanted to stay in the play off hunt.


Then not sure why the ownership would have any more confidence in Vladar and Wolf this coming season as neither is giving an indication of being able to replace Markstrom.
Mar. 19 at 1:57 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 346
Quoting: jfkst1
Then not sure why the ownership would have any more confidence in Vladar and Wolf this coming season as neither is giving an indication of being able to replace Markstrom.


It's easier to trade him away when next seasons a blank slate instead of being 4 points out of the playoffs. I think he'll let the team know he doesn't want to come back next season too.
Mar. 19 at 2:28 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 1,079
Seems like a high price to dump Chase Stillman for
Mar. 19 at 4:37 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,389
Likes: 3,177
Quoting: jfkst1
Then not sure why the ownership would have any more confidence in Vladar and Wolf this coming season as neither is giving an indication of being able to replace Markstrom.


Obviously you haven't seen Wolf play lately. He's the main reason Calgary beat Vegas and Montreal. Wolf had a .947 save percentage vs Montreal with a bunch of big saves in a game Calgary won 5-2 in spite of being outshot 38-28. The game before that vs Vegas Calgary won 4-1 behind Wolf's .966 save percentage.
Mar. 19 at 5:16 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,223
Likes: 18,365
Better get three Markstroms at that price
Mar. 19 at 6:21 p.m.
#11
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,325
Quoting: MoxNix
Obviously you haven't seen Wolf play lately. He's the main reason Calgary beat Vegas and Montreal. Wolf had a .947 save percentage vs Montreal with a bunch of big saves in a game Calgary won 5-2 in spite of being outshot 38-28. The game before that vs Vegas Calgary won 4-1 behind Wolf's .966 save percentage.


Obviously you haven't watched NHL hockey for very long. Taking a tiny sample and extrapolating that into a player's future value whilst ignoring the larger collective body of work is asking for issues.
Mar. 19 at 6:54 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,389
Likes: 3,177
Quoting: jfkst1
Obviously you haven't watched NHL hockey for very long. Taking a tiny sample and extrapolating that into a player's future value whilst ignoring the larger collective body of work is asking for issues.


Ok you're just another nut using strawman arguments.
Mar. 20 at 9:47 a.m.
#13
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,325
Quoting: MoxNix
Ok you're just another nut using strawman arguments.


32/32 GMs would agree with my opinion over yours. CGY ownership reached this very conclusion several weeks ago. But I'm just a "nut" because I thoroughly dismantled your argument of trusting an underachieving player with no record of starting goalie play at the goalie position that has extreme inconsistency inherent in the position. I'm a "nut" for responding to you actually.
Mar. 20 at 1:01 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,389
Likes: 3,177
Quoting: jfkst1
32/32 GMs would agree with my opinion over yours. CGY ownership reached this very conclusion several weeks ago. But I'm just a "nut" because I thoroughly dismantled your argument of trusting an underachieving player with no record of starting goalie play at the goalie position that has extreme inconsistency inherent in the position. I'm a "nut" for responding to you actually.


You dismantled nothing. Your claiming I said something I did not say and then saying that's wrong is the very definition of a strawman argument. Yes that makes you a nut.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll