SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

whats the approach

Created by: Bruins_Guy613
Team: 2024-25 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 25, 2024
Published: Mar. 25, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$875,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
5$6,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,500,000
7$7,500,000
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$87,104,167$50,000$542,500$595,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$7,500,000$7,500,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$875,000$875,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 25 at 10:22 a.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,579
Likes: 22,702
Seven years for Lindholm doesn't seem wise
I wonder if Sens would be on Ullmark's trade list, though it might be a fair trade.
Mar. 25 at 10:24 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 868
goalie values are hard to work out so I'm not really sure if this value is fair or in favour of one team or the other. I'd probably do this for the Sens though, if this is a scenario where we're assuming that Ullmark would be willing to go to Ottawa and has a non-zero chance of extending. Merkulov I really don't know anything about besides his numbers, but those are certainly encouraging
Mar. 25 at 10:48 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,800
Likes: 8,840
Edited Mar. 25 at 11:19 a.m.
Ullmark is not waiving for Ottawa.

But you know that.

Something that is never discussed but should be at least an option to consider…extending Ullmark and trading Swayman. They get a better return and no limitations as who they can trade with. 🤷🏻‍♂️. Just don’t 🤬 it up and trade him for PLD.


Both fan bases would hate it but a trade than involved Sway for Pinto or Greig with other pieces involved would not be the worst thing.
Mar. 25 at 11:33 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 1,172
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ullmark is not waiving for Ottawa.

But you know that.

Something that is never discussed but should be at least an option to consider…extending Ullmark and trading Swayman. They get a better return and no limitations as who they can trade with. 🤷🏻‍♂️. Just don’t 🤬 it up and trade him for PLD.


Both fan bases would hate it but a trade than involved Sway for Pinto or Greig with other pieces involved would not be the worst thing.


I believe the PLD deal is more of a real possibility than other Bruins fans. I hope I’m wrong, but I can see the rationale for both teams. To me, it just depends on what LA offers to supplement the salary premium and whether Ullmark is willing to waive for an extension.

If I’m trading Swayman, I’m taking a swing on a high ceiling center. Pinto or Greig don’t fit that profile to me. I’d be looking at Dawson Mercer or Shane Wright.
Mar. 25 at 11:38 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,800
Likes: 8,840
Quoting: Celtics21
I believe the PLD deal is more of a real possibility than other Bruins fans. I hope I’m wrong, but I can see the rationale for both teams. To me, it just depends on what LA offers to supplement the salary premium and whether Ullmark is willing to waive for an extension.

If I’m trading Swayman, I’m taking a swing on a high ceiling center. Pinto or Greig don’t fit that profile to me. I’d be looking at Dawson Mercer or Shane Wright.


As long as it is a good YOUNG center that is not PLD….i’m good. Seattle does not need a goalie. I’ve said all along Sway for Mercer is good trade for both teams thst will piss both fan bases off. Lol. But NJ FO says he is off limits. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll