SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The old socks

Created by: Missouri
Team: 2024-25 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 18, 2024
Published: Mar. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This is a simulated result of what trades/signings were made in our GHL GM League for a simulated off-season.

GM's were tasked with the job of getting their team ready for the season. They had to stay within the salary cap restrictions and must have a maximum of 6 players on the Taxi Squad for injury relief purposes.

Your job is to comment and evaluate how the GM managed their team.

Questions to answer:
1. What was the best move made by the GM?
2. What was the worst move made by the GM?
3. Did the GM improve the team or make them worse?

Thank you for playing! Our GHL GM League is played for a couple of months then posted on CapFriendly for everyone to see the results made by the GM's!
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$6,850,000
2$950,000
2$1,125,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
McGing, Hugh$800,000No Compensation
Trades
SJS
  1. 2025 4th round pick (TBL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MIN
2025
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
2026
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$88,000,000$87,660,000$0$80,000$340,000

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,850,000$6,850,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,250,000$6,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,665,000$2,665,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,200,000$5,200,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$775,000$775,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$975,000$975,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LD
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW
RFA
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 27 at 3:01 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,576
Likes: 10,421
Best move: re-signing Stamkos
Worst move: trading for Rutta
Team is worse. Brought in Rutta and Girgensons instead of re-signing Duclair
Missouri and Brolekb2b liked this.
Mar. 27 at 3:09 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,614
Likes: 1,141
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Best move: re-signing Stamkos
Worst move: trading for Rutta
Team is worse. Brought in Rutta and Girgensons instead of re-signing Duclair


Thanks for playing! Yeah the Tampa GM had a tough go. He tried signing Zadorov and then he got overpaid so he went a total different route. I think he lost for not doing enough in general to get better.
Mar. 27 at 3:11 p.m.
#3
CapEvasionEnthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 763
Likes: 447
Best move was probably resigning Stamkos. AAV is a bit steep for a 2 year. An additional year of term would have been nice on that, he'll probably want security when it comes time to negotiate.

Worst move? Oh boy. Seeing as this is 24-25, trading for Jan Rutta has to be up there with other things. If Rutta was in TB's plans he'd have already signed here instead. Lilleberg might need some more developing sure but he's transitioned pretty well to the NHL in his rookie year for us as a 3LD. There's no need to give up an asset for Rutta (and play him at his off-hand on LD) at that AAV when we're still missing a top six scoring help in this lineup, or could use an extra top four RD option instead. Rutta just eats up cap that could be used elsewhere. It's either this or bringing back Barre-Boulet to occupy a roster spot when he's done nothing but cardio for the last 2 months during his NHL stint.

Overall I'd say the team probably gets worse. Rutta is a missed chance to add to the forward core, Conor Sheary is not a legitimate top six option, and the Alex Barre-Boulet is an NHLer experiment has failed, it's time to let go. Also I'm not exactly sure what Girgensons contributes to the bottom six at that cap hit that a guy like Tyler Motte making close to league minimum or a player from Syracuse can't.
Missouri liked this.
Mar. 27 at 3:15 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,614
Likes: 1,141
Quoting: Brolekb2b
Best move was probably resigning Stamkos. AAV is a bit steep for a 2 year. An additional year of term would have been nice on that, he'll probably want security when it comes time to negotiate.

Worst move? Oh boy. Seeing as this is 24-25, trading for Jan Rutta has to be up there with other things. If Rutta was in TB's plans he'd have already signed here instead. Lilleberg might need some more developing sure but he's transitioned pretty well to the NHL in his rookie year for us as a 3LD. There's no need to give up an asset for Rutta (and play him at his off-hand on LD) at that AAV when we're still missing a top six scoring help in this lineup, or could use an extra top four RD option instead. Rutta just eats up cap that could be used elsewhere. It's either this or bringing back Barre-Boulet to occupy a roster spot when he's done nothing but cardio for the last 2 months during his NHL stint.

Overall I'd say the team probably gets worse. Rutta is a missed chance to add to the forward core, Conor Sheary is not a legitimate top six option, and the Alex Barre-Boulet is an NHLer experiment has failed, it's time to let go. Also I'm not exactly sure what Girgensons contributes to the bottom six at that cap hit that a guy like Tyler Motte making close to league minimum or a player from Syracuse can't.


Thanks for playing! I agree with everything you said!
Brolekb2b liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll