SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lottery winners

Created by: Shdhsjsjdhhdjsjd
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 5, 2024
Published: Apr. 5, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
2$2,000,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Broberg, Philip [RFA Rights]
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2026 3rd round pick (EDM)
2.
VAN
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (NJD)
3.
SJS
  1. 2024 5th round pick (WSH)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,500,000$63,462,500$0$1,350,000$20,037,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$941,667$941,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
RFA
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 5 at 7:01 p.m.
#1
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 723
easy no from oilers. buy out and keep our prospects
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Apr. 5 at 7:07 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,180
Likes: 9,408
It’s a fair offer for Garland but I’m not sure that the Canucks want to move him. If they move a winger it would likely be Mikheyev
Apr. 5 at 9:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: mv21227
It’s a fair offer for Garland but I’m not sure that the Canucks want to move him. If they move a winger it would likely be Mikheyev


Garland wasn’t bad, but he is overpaid and no one is giving up a 2nd for him
Apr. 5 at 9:06 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: mm1010
easy no from oilers. buy out and keep our prospects


If they moved him for this they would have done it already I expect a simple buyout
Apr. 5 at 9:45 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,180
Likes: 9,408
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Garland wasn’t bad, but he is overpaid and no one is giving up a 2nd for him


Garland is worth his contract. He’s been one of the Canucks best forwards this season and a crucial part of our success. He’s just not putting up as many points as the last couple seasons, but I’d say he’s playing better overall and has been well worth his cap hit this year
cooliny liked this.
Apr. 6 at 2:07 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: mv21227
Garland is worth his contract. He’s been one of the Canucks best forwards this season and a crucial part of our success. He’s just not putting up as many points as the last couple seasons, but I’d say he’s playing better overall and has been well worth his cap hit this year


Ok I’ll give you he is having a good season, but why are the Sharks trading a top 40 pick for a 30+ forward?
Apr. 6 at 2:12 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,180
Likes: 9,408
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Ok I’ll give you he is having a good season, but why are the Sharks trading a top 40 pick for a 30+ forward?


Garland is only 28, but still you’re right that it doesn’t make sense for SJ to trade for him
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Apr. 6 at 1:04 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 1,181
I love it when fans assume a player is overpaid and not liked by a franchise. If Garland wants to stay, I see no reason to trade him.

His value likely isn’t high enough for Vancouver to give up on him, but he’s solid and would be expensive to replace. That’s basically 1/2 the starters in the league
Apr. 6 at 5:42 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: Celtics21
I love it when fans assume a player is overpaid and not liked by a franchise. If Garland wants to stay, I see no reason to trade him.

His value likely isn’t high enough for Vancouver to give up on him, but he’s solid and would be expensive to replace. That’s basically 1/2 the starters in the league


He has a lot of value for Vancouver and is doing well, sharks are not in position to trade for him, especially with Sharks having Granlund who is very similar player. I could see interest if we move Granlund but not for a high 2nd
Apr. 6 at 9:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He has a lot of value for Vancouver and is doing well, sharks are not in position to trade for him, especially with Sharks having Granlund who is very similar player. I could see interest if we move Granlund but not for a high 2nd


My assumption is Granlund doesn’t have the value to other teams that he does to San Jose.
Apr. 6 at 10:33 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: Celtics21
My assumption is Granlund doesn’t have the value to other teams that he does to San Jose.


Same could be said for Gardner
Apr. 7 at 2:45 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Same could be said for Gardner


Assume you mean Garland? Either way, it’s one of the reasons that trades don’t happen all that often. Coming up with equal valuations when you consider role, salary, fit within structure, and fit within locker room is tough
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Apr. 7 at 3:42 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: Celtics21
Assume you mean Garland? Either way, it’s one of the reasons that trades don’t happen all that often. Coming up with equal valuations when you consider role, salary, fit within structure, and fit within locker room is tough


I did and I agree. It’s hard to move a guy who is more valuable to your team than the league feels he is. I would say the same about Sturm for us, and Quite a few players for you guys! Still think that Lindholm deal was dumb, Calgary fleeced you guys.
Apr. 7 at 3:46 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I did and I agree. It’s hard to move a guy who is more valuable to your team than the league feels he is. I would say the same about Sturm for us, and Quite a few players for you guys! Still think that Lindholm deal was dumb, Calgary fleeced you guys.


Not a Canucks fan, but I don’t think it was as big a fleece as some suggest. I want to see what Hunter does at the AHL. He’s played well this year, but that jump is huge especially for players whose talent level is not elite. His teams best player last year sucked in the AHL and frankly he was a considerably more productive player as an older player in the OHL.

I think they were concerned that Petterson was not going to resign and got an insurance policy that allowed them to take a harder line position. In retrospect, I think they’d be better off with a forward
Apr. 7 at 3:55 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: Celtics21
Not a Canucks fan, but I don’t think it was as big a fleece as some suggest. I want to see what Hunter does at the AHL. He’s played well this year, but that jump is huge especially for players whose talent level is not elite. His teams best player last year sucked in the AHL and frankly he was a considerably more productive player as an older player in the OHL.

I think they were concerned that Petterson was not going to resign and got an insurance policy that allowed them to take a harder line position. In retrospect, I think they’d be better off with a forward

I just really like Kuzmenko and felt giving him up plus a 1st for a rental in a down season was a bad move. I might be wrong time will tell.
Apr. 7 at 5:37 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I just really like Kuzmenko and felt giving him up plus a 1st for a rental in a down season was a bad move. I might be wrong time will tell.


Kuzmenko isn’t a player most winning teams would want. To me, that was an intelligent salary dump.
Apr. 7 at 10:51 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,240
Likes: 4,674
Quoting: Celtics21
Kuzmenko isn’t a player most winning teams would want. To me, that was an intelligent salary dump.


I guess your right since they dumped him, but I feel next year he bounces back to 30+ goals.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll