ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

PLAYERS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

cooliny

BRUCE THERE IT IS

Member Since

Nov. 15, 2020

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

1367

Posts per Day

1.7

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: Garland

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WorstTradesPossible</b></div><div>That crossed my mind, and TO wouldn’t have much trouble upping the value on that with another piece.</div></div>

I think swap the 1st to the retention team and the 3rd to Vancouver and it’s more fair

Forum: Armchair-GM14 hours ago

Thread: Garland

Canucks accept, the retention by a 3rd party might need more than a 3rd though, as $2.5 over 4 years is a lot

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 11:12 a.m.

Thread: Under the radar move

Canucks aren’t retaining 8 million over 4 years for a 4th round pick

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 11:12 p.m.

Thread: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks

Canucks are certainly accumulating some good pieces now, but if they manage to nab Smith and Reinbacher in the draft, they’ll have a really good core moving forward

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 5:54 p.m.

Thread: WOAH

Great value for Canucks imo, could always flip Beau for more picks

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: At The Draft

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>That’s something I’d do. Make the 1st top 2 protected and I’m down. Ideally I’d want to send Thomson instead of JBD because of play style but if they insist on JBD so be it</div></div>

Could the Sens drop the 2nds and change the 2024 to 2023 1st? Seems unlikely they would move a top 10 pick but it would be similar to the Cory Schneider deal

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 12:02 p.m.

Thread: Enough for Bo Too little Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jfstompers</b></div><div>It's not enough for right now. I think it takes a 1st, Veleno/Ras and either one of the good d prospects like Wallinder or maybe it's Hronek.</div></div>

I’d do Horvat for Wallinder + pick, would Detroit?

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 10:50 a.m.

Thread: Enough for Bo Too little Thoughts

Definitely not, Rasmussen and Veleno are not high end pieces.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 7:50 p.m.

Thread: Hmmm

Committing almost a combined $30 million to 4 defencemen, 3 of which are only worth half their value, seems very counterproductive.

Trouba also won't waive his NMC for a Canadian team

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 12:57 p.m.

Thread: A wayfarer from up the coast

It's not a bad offer, and I would take that, but I think it lacks the high end piece the Canucks want

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 11:20 p.m.

Thread: Bucci Dont Do This To Me

Would be unreal if this happened

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 8:17 p.m.

Thread: Three Way Trade

It’s unlikely Canucks can get Laffy, Chytil, and KK for Horvat and Kuz

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 11:07 a.m.

Thread: Another Boeser to NJ Trade

Boeser would explode on Jack’s wing

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 10:41 a.m.

Thread: Horrible trade for van but edm fans might like

Not as horrible for Van as you might think, maybe add a mid round pick because Puljujarvi and Yamamoto have no value to the Canucks

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 11:17 p.m.

Thread: Way off the board

I would do this as a Canucks fan if Kravtsov was replaced with a mid round pick. 2nd or 3rd. I personally am a huge fan of Chytil and I think he is exactly the type of player Canucks management wants and would fill Horvat’s void.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14 at 3:40 p.m.

Thread: Realistic TDL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Devils probably want a little more term than 2 months out of a Casey/1st package.</div></div>

Does Casey and a 3rd get it done then? Kuzmenko can always sign an extension

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 5:14 p.m.

Thread: Laf trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OfficialTimpa</b></div><div>That's delusional</div></div>

Would you trade a chance for Bedard for a young player who's struggling?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 5:12 p.m.

Thread: Laf trade

Canucks wouldn't trade Horvat for Laf, let alone Podz and a 1st

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7 at 3:47 p.m.

Thread: Not a Devils fan

Casey for Horvat - he's a right shot centre and dman!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5 at 11:10 p.m.

Thread: Cup 2

So when the Panthers have no 1sts in the foreseeable future they trade a promising young center for an UFA?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5 at 11:08 p.m.

Thread: The Art of The Blockbuster

Where’s the part of the deal for Horvat?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5 at 6:43 p.m.

Thread: Dallas

Id say Garland and Marchment are a wash, and could even say Marchment>Garland. So don’t think Kuzmenko and Rathbone will get Bourque and Bichsel

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5 at 12:26 p.m.

Thread: Can this team win the cup

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Petersen and the third for Demko is fair. Walker is better than Schenn at RhD. If you want to wave the white flag by admitting that Kuzmenko won't re-sign with you, we'll give you Grundstrom for his rights and then add the Walker-Schenn exchange if you want. Kaliyev and the first have nothing to do with anything here.</div></div>

Even though Demko hasn’t been good this season, no way Petersen and a 3rd is fair. He’s been sent on waivers.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4 at 11:22 p.m.

Thread: Canucks reset at deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeautifulIdiot</b></div><div>I think that we could get more value out of a trade with rathbone and Kuzy</div></div>

Id take that, and Rathbone doesn’t have a lot of value

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4 at 3:02 a.m.

Thread: Bruins

Horvat: 1st+
Kuzmenko: 1st+
Schenn: 2nd

Value is not at all there, especially without any top prospects and camp dumps coming the other way

Page 1

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2023 CapFriendly.com