SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

End of Season Player Grades

Created by: newman23
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 17, 2024
Published: Apr. 17, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
A: Positive performance nearly every game
B: Positive performance majority of games
C: Roughly similar amount of positive and negative performances
D: Negative performance majority of games
F: Negative performance nearly every game
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Not Enough, Data
1$1,000,000
A Season, Grade
1$1,000,000
B Season, Grade
1$1,000,000
C Season, Grade
1$1,000,000
D Season, Grade
1$1,000,000
F Season, Grade
1$1,000,000
Mrazek, Petr
1$1,000,000
Soderblom, Arvid
1$1,000,000
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
38$83,500,000$81,430,957$0$6,477,500$2,069,043
Left WingCentreRight Wing
A Season, Grade
$1,000,000$1,000,000
B Season, Grade
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C Season, Grade
$1,000,000$1,000,000
Mrazek, Petr
$1,000,000$1,000,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
D Season, Grade
$1,000,000$1,000,000
F Season, Grade
$1,000,000$1,000,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Soderblom, Arvid
$1,000,000$1,000,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Not Enough, Data
$1,000,000$1,000,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$25,000$25K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 17 at 3:43 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1,358
I agree with most of these...the only thing I will say is that Reichel has looked quite a bit better since returning from the AHL. Hopefully he can continue to build on that next year.
newman23 and Garak liked this.
Apr. 17 at 3:49 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 666
Quoting: DangleCat
I agree with most of these...the only thing I will say is that Reichel has looked quite a bit better since returning from the AHL. Hopefully he can continue to build on that next year.


Completely agree, he hasnt been the player most hawks fans expected to see until these last 15 or so games but I still have full faith in him to become an impact forward at the NHL level. Shame it took him so long to get his footing this season. I think all the injuries and inconsistent linemates really hamstrung him this year too
DangleCat and Garak liked this.
Apr. 17 at 3:55 p.m.
#3
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 1,023
Fair assessment only one that I disagree with is Megna. Dude was a waiver claim and expected to play murphys role in his stead. Going from 7th d/ahl tweener to the #4 is a lot to ask of someone and he did fine in that role. F is too harsh but C/D would be better imo.
Garak liked this.
Apr. 17 at 4:20 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 666
Quoting: CFMan
Fair assessment only one that I disagree with is Megna. Dude was a waiver claim and expected to play murphys role in his stead. Going from 7th d/ahl tweener to the #4 is a lot to ask of someone and he did fine in that role. F is too harsh but C/D would be better imo.


Understand your viewpoint. IMO its not entirely megnas fault bc he doesnt control his usage but hes just not an NHL player and pairing him with korchinski hurt KKs development this season so its hard for me to say he didnt have a negative impact most nights, even if he played fine for what he is.

Hindsight is 20/20 but I think it wouldve been beneficial long term for korchinski if davidson had gone out and paid a 4th for collin miller or troy stetcher if he thought murphy could miss significant time this year.
CFMan and Garak liked this.
Apr. 17 at 6:49 p.m.
#5
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,682
Likes: 9,833
I agree with most of these too. Probably would have put AA as not enough if we're talking just this year's performance. Really pretty disappointed with TRad. I had a lot of hopes for him. Hopefully he finds his place.
Garak and newman23 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll