SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Looking towards next season

Created by: Hckeydude123
Team: 2024-25 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 23, 2024
Published: Apr. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$975,000
8$8,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,000,000
2$3,750,000
1$1,000,000
2$850,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. 2024 6th round pick (ANA)
ANA
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav
Additional Details:
Don’t care where he goes just get rid of em
2.
LAK
STL
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur [RFA Rights]
  2. Spence, Jordan [RFA Rights]
  3. Turcotte, Alex [RFA Rights]
  4. 2025 1st round pick (LAK)
  5. 2026 1st round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
Blues can choose between the 2026 1st or 2024 1st. Figured the 2026 1st had more value.
3.
OTT
  1. 2025 6th round pick (LAK)
Retained Salary Transactions
Termination Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the LAK
2025
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2026
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$87,500,000$89,348,333$1,850,000$850,000-$1,848,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,900,000$2,900,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,200,000$4,200,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
$850,000$850,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$835,000$835,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$875,000$875,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,125,000$4,125,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 23 at 2:19 a.m.
#1
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,348
Likes: 11,376
Obviously there's a lot of value in your offer. I'm not sure it's all the right value.

The 24 1st would be a super nice thing to have, no doubt. Spence is intriguing, but he's also a small Dman (which is going to make the Blues have the heebie jeebies) and an RD, which doesn't really work as things stand in STL. Turcotte is also nice, also not a need fit. Kaliyev would be nice to have, but he's not holding the value he once did. The 25 1st is nice and all, but again, not necessarily in line with pressing needs.

Long story short, you'd be better off keeping many of those young talent assets, forgetting about Binny to find a goalie elsewhere and trying your hand at a Buch offer that kicks off with the 24 1st. I'm not sure the Kings have the right pieces to pull it off, but like Army, I'm here to listen.
Apr. 23 at 3:20 a.m.
#2
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 1,080
What’s wrong with Gavrikov? He was a stud in Columbus
Apr. 23 at 7:19 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,554
Likes: 6,454
Quoting: Dekes
What’s wrong with Gavrikov? He was a stud in Columbus


LA's coaching sucks and it's much easier for fans to blame the players. Also, the lockerroom is a mess, it makes it hard for players to focus on their jobs when there is so much tension
Apr. 23 at 11:44 p.m.
#4
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 1,080
Quoting: Campabee
LA's coaching sucks and it's much easier for fans to blame the players. Also, the lockerroom is a mess, it makes it hard for players to focus on their jobs when there is so much tension


What do you think realistically would be his cost to acquire?
I wouldn’t mind him on the bruins.

Bruins need another strong LHD so lindholm can focus more on offence rather then defence. He’s been taking on a lot of the tough match-ups with mcavoy and doesn’t get as much offensive opportunities as he did last season.

I doubt they go back on Chychrun. I want no part of OEL personally Dillon and Gavrikov would be good fits for me next to mcavoy, they aren’t good transitional dmen but are solid once in the zone and mcavoy Carries the puck most the time anyways so not a glaring whole if they can’t carry the puck
Apr. 24 at 7:08 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,554
Likes: 6,454
Quoting: Dekes
What do you think realistically would be his cost to acquire?
I wouldn’t mind him on the bruins.

Bruins need another strong LHD so lindholm can focus more on offence rather then defence. He’s been taking on a lot of the tough match-ups with mcavoy and doesn’t get as much offensive opportunities as he did last season.

I doubt they go back on Chychrun. I want no part of OEL personally Dillon and Gavrikov would be good fits for me next to mcavoy, they aren’t good transitional dmen but are solid once in the zone and mcavoy Carries the puck most the time anyways so not a glaring whole if they can’t carry the puck


Realistically it's gonna cost at least what LA gave up but I don't think LA will be looking to move him (whether the op likes it or not) they are also in win now mode and need him on their blueline.

I know they are young but both Harris and Struble are great defensively and can transition up ice well. They are better suited to the bottom 4 so I wouldn't necessarily put either with McAvoy on the top pair but both could be had for about a 2nd
Dekes liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll