SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dreaming but semi-realistic

Created by: Jded
Team: 2024-25 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: May 1, 2024
Published: May 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Ducks fans I know you hate this Skinner addition, but I personally think a Yakemchuk level player would be worth it if BUF would actually be interested and would retain $2M (both big ifs).

Even if ANA kept every contract, this is roughly our team in 3 years when we’d first have cap concerns (excl a large number of 2nd rd+ prospects who could make the leap):
Gauthier (7) - Leo (8) - Demidov (1)
Zegras (7) - McT (8) - Terry (7)
Killorn (6.25) - Strome (5) - Skinner (7)
X (1) - Gaucher (1.5) - Colangelo (1.5)
= 60.25

Minty (5) - Yakemchuk (1)
Zell (5) - Roy (6.5)
Lacombe (2.5) - Luneau (2.5)
= 22.5

Dostal (4)
Gibby (6.4)
=10.4

==93.15

That probably isn’t far off of where the cap would be. Not to mention we’ll be in a position to move some of these less desirable vet contracts with young guys like Sidorov, Myatovic, etc filling in. Shouldn’t cost too much to move the vets since they’ll all be on their last year (Gibby, Strome, Skinner, Killorn), and that’s like $25M right there
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$6,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3$950,000
Yakemchuk, Carter
3$950,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Skinner, Jeff ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. 2024 1st round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
No idea how BUF fans would view this. The idea stems from a convo from a BUF ACGM

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/828904?post_id=4864485
BUF
  1. Jones, Max [RFA Rights]
  2. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
ANA fans I know you don’t want Skinner, but see the cap projection. This should be doable
2.
ANA
    Not sure the return, not really the focal point of this ACGM
    STL
    1. LaCombe, Jackson [RFA Rights]
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2025
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    2026
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$87,700,000$72,959,167$0$8,330,000$14,740,833
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$950,000$950K)
    LW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $3,650,000$3,650,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,250,000$6,250,000
    RW, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW
    RFA
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
    RW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$800,000$800K)
    LD
    RFA - 2
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    RD
    UFA
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $844,167$844,167
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $812,500$812,500
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $865,000$865,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
    RD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD/RD
    RFA
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Demidov, Ivan
    $950,000$950,000
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Yakemchuk, Carter
    $950,000$950,000

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 2 at 1:25 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 28,053
    Likes: 14,666
    If we are gonna use the 7 million from skinners non retention to go after a bigger fish, then yes. If pegula is just gonna pocket it and play a rookie, then no

    So, no.
    Boos and Jded liked this.
    May 2 at 1:31 p.m.
    #2
    Sabres fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 5,052
    Likes: 3,121
    Edited May 2 at 2:37 p.m.
    Many Sabres fans here think that Skinner is cancer and we have to get rid of him. I’m in the minority it seems, understanding that he doesn’t need to go anywhere. Aside from the fact his full no movement clause means he can just say no to a trade anywhere. It doesn’t do Buffalo any good to burn money and get nothing for it, and late firsts don’t do much for a team with a loaded prospect pool. This just doesn’t work for Buffalo.
    AntiAnalytics, Boos and Jded liked this.
    May 2 at 1:49 p.m.
    #3
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    It really doesn’t matter what my fellow fans “want”
    Sabres mgmt likes Skinner, and it’s EXTREMELY UNLIKELY that he’s moved
    Jded liked this.
    May 2 at 1:51 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,060
    Likes: 750
    Your compensation for 7M of Skinner over 3 years is way light using PuckPedia's tools. The Ducks should be getting the value of a 9th OA draft pick for that contract and the difference between the Buffalo #11 and the picks from the Ducks is only 24 OA. The BUF pick alone with no picks going back isn't enough if we're talking about a pure cap dump. I guess you are giving Skinner as a player some value to off set, but I still think the Ducks lose a lot of value here.

    I slotted the Edmonton pick at 28 since we won't know where exactly that pick is for a few weeks. FWIW.
    May 2 at 2:40 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,872
    Likes: 1,898
    Quoting: CHAR
    Your compensation for 7M of Skinner over 3 years is way light using PuckPedia's tools. The Ducks should be getting the value of a 9th OA draft pick for that contract and the difference between the Buffalo #11 and the picks from the Ducks is only 24 OA. The BUF pick alone with no picks going back isn't enough if we're talking about a pure cap dump. I guess you are giving Skinner as a player some value to off set, but I still think the Ducks lose a lot of value here.

    I slotted the Edmonton pick at 28 since we won't know where exactly that pick is for a few weeks. FWIW.


    Hey hey Char! Help me understand why Skinner would cost a 9OA to move at $7M. He has 92 - 99 -191 in 233 games over the past 3 seasons

    For context, none of us are upset about Terry’s $7M, and he has 80 - 102 - 182 in 221
    May 2 at 2:43 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,872
    Likes: 1,898
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    If we are gonna use the 7 million from skinners non retention to go after a bigger fish, then yes. If pegula is just gonna pocket it and play a rookie, then no

    So, no.


    Super reasonable
    May 2 at 2:44 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,872
    Likes: 1,898
    Quoting: Tjm220
    Many Sabres fans here think that Skinner is cancer and we have to get rid of him. I’m in the minority it seems, understanding that he doesn’t need to go anywhere. Aside from the fact his full no movement clause means he can just say no to a trade anywhere. It doesn’t do Buffalo any good to burn money and get nothing for it, and late firsts don’t do much for a team with a loaded prospect pool. This just doesn’t work for Buffalo.


    I don’t disagree at all. Thanks for sharing
    Tjm220 liked this.
    May 2 at 4:36 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,060
    Likes: 750
    Edited May 2 at 4:41 p.m.
    Quoting: Jded
    Hey hey Char! Help me understand why Skinner would cost a 9OA to move at $7M. He has 92 - 99 -191 in 233 games over the past 3 seasons

    For context, none of us are upset about Terry’s $7M, and he has 80 - 102 - 182 in 221


    Cause that's what the tool says that much cap relief is worth...

    https://puckpedia.com/CapRelief

    Like I said, that is putting the contract into a vacuum and ignoring the player completely. Go the other direction.... if you were to trade a pick(s) only for Skinner the player ignoring contract what value would you put on him? I honestly don't know what value I'd give him but I don't think I'd trade a 24th overall draft pick for him. I don't know, maybe he is worth that much.

    Where he breaks down a bit for me is if he is a 50-60 point player or an 80 point player? He's scored 50-ish points in a season a lot more often than he has 80. You should be able to get a 50 point player in free agency without giving up any value. Is he really all that much better @7M than Vatrano was last season @3.6M? Would you trade a 24th OA pick for Vatrano? I wouldn't.
    May 2 at 5:09 p.m.
    #9
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Quoting: CHAR
    Cause that's what the tool says that much cap relief is worth...

    https://puckpedia.com/CapRelief

    Like I said, that is putting the contract into a vacuum and ignoring the player completely. Go the other direction.... if you were to trade a pick(s) only for Skinner the player ignoring contract what value would you put on him? I honestly don't know what value I'd give him but I don't think I'd trade a 24th overall draft pick for him. I don't know, maybe he is worth that much.

    Where he breaks down a bit for me is if he is a 50-60 point player or an 80 point player? He's scored 50-ish points in a season a lot more often than he has 80. You should be able to get a 50 point player in free agency without giving up any value. Is he really all that much better 7M than Vatrano was last season 3.6M? Would you trade a 24th OA pick for Vatrano? I wouldn't.


    1- Skinner isn’t just a cap dump though
    2- we aren’t trading him anyways, so it’s pointless to argue about
    May 2 at 5:13 p.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,872
    Likes: 1,898
    Quoting: CHAR
    Cause that's what the tool says that much cap relief is worth...

    https://puckpedia.com/CapRelief

    Like I said, that is putting the contract into a vacuum and ignoring the player completely. Go the other direction.... if you were to trade a pick(s) only for Skinner the player ignoring contract what value would you put on him? I honestly don't know what value I'd give him but I don't think I'd trade a 24th overall draft pick for him. I don't know, maybe he is worth that much.

    Where he breaks down a bit for me is if he is a 50-60 point player or an 80 point player? He's scored 50-ish points in a season a lot more often than he has 80. You should be able to get a 50 point player in free agency without giving up any value. Is he really all that much better 7M than Vatrano was last season 3.6M? Would you trade a 24th OA pick for Vatrano? I wouldn't.


    I’m not sure I’m buying the tool’s valuation on this one at all. Like you said, Cap relief isn’t made in a vacuum here, there’s a player that comes along with it who has very material value. We’re not simply retaining $7M. We’re taking on $7M and then getting roughly 30 goals and 30 assists per year. Those are very different things. Would we use Puckpedia to evaluate Terry’s trade value as a $7M cap relief?

    I’d argue that Vatrano isn’t a good comp at all either. If he had the year he just had before FA, he’d cost a heck of a lot more than $3.7M to sign. It’s incredibly rare and lucky to find a 35 goal scorer in FA for under $4M, he’s a huge outlier

    Frankly, the idea that you could go from 28th to 11th while adding a ~60pt scorer at a position of need on what would be a maybe $1.5M-$2M overpriced contract for 3 years seems outrageously favorable to ANA imo if anything.
    May 2 at 5:13 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,060
    Likes: 750
    Quoting: AntiAnalytics
    1- Skinner isn’t just a cap dump though
    2- we aren’t trading him anyways, so it’s pointless to argue about


    No argument on my side, I think it's an interesting discussion on value. You are a Buffalo fan... in a hypothetical for picks only trade what would you expect to get back for Skinner?
    May 2 at 5:31 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,060
    Likes: 750
    Quoting: Jded
    Would we use Puckpedia to evaluate Terry’s trade value as a $7M cap relief?


    I'd have to know why we were trading Terry. In this question context and motivation for the trade matters. Is the team capped out and desperate for room? Did Terry become horrible value at that AAV? Do we have a better/cheaper replacement for Terry? There would have to be reasons why Terry is traded and what those reasons are determine if you are trading him as a cap dump or a positive value asset.

    In a similar vein, why would Buffalo trade Skinner here? What is their motivation with littlejerryseinfeld's comment in my mind.
    May 3 at 2:03 a.m.
    #13
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2023
    Posts: 5,832
    Likes: 3,816
    Edited May 3 at 1:35 p.m.
    Quoting: CHAR
    No argument on my side, I think it's an interesting discussion on value. You are a Buffalo fan... in a hypothetical for picks only trade what would you expect to get back for Skinner?


    I don’t think we are gonna try to move him
    But if we did- big “if”
    Then i don’t think we’d do it to a team who views him as a “Cap dump”

    I frankly don’t know what an (admittedly) expensive 30goal scorer who gets 60+ pts & isn’t great defensively is worth
    I’d imagine some teams would just hang up the phone & say no thanks
    Others might offer pick(s)/prospects
    But to get any reasonable sort of return, we’d have to hold half & send him to a contender type team looking to boost their offense

    This is the most I’m willing to dwell it this hypothetical though
    Bc i don’t find it “interesting” to discuss the extremely unlikely
    No offense, it’s just not my thing
    CHAR and Jded liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll