SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Boeser006Petey014

Member Since
May 23, 2019
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
2nd Favourite Team
Winnipeg Jets
Forum Posts
24
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 27, 2019 at 2:21 a.m.
Thread: Ducks What if they tank in 2019-2020
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>saph</b></div><div>I personally think you're giving too much; maybe changing the 2nd to a 4th would even it out.</div></div>

I agree with you that it feels like I may be giving up a lot in the deal. What made me give up the 2nd round pick was the Fowler contract. Under this trade the Ducks would be free of the Ladd and Boychuk contracts within 3 years and both also have a lower cap hit. The Fowler contract is for 6 years and has a higher cap hit as well. I get the feeling that the last 2-3 years of that contract could be pretty rough for the Islanders. Im also a big fan of Wilde. I would imagine that Fowler is a considerable upgrade to Boychuck for the next 2 years, hence why the Islanders would be intrigued. For the Ducks it would also free up cap space to be used elsewhere. Hope that kind of explains my rationale
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 23, 2019 at 6:33 p.m.
Thread: Messing around with Evander Kane
I don't know if you can get rid of the Gudbranson contract or the Johnson contract without giving up a sweetener. They are bot replacement level d-men that are being paid too much. I don't mind the Hutton signing all to much however. The Kane trade is interesting im not the biggest fan of his or his contract, but I wonder if taking on the remaining years of Bjustad (who isn't all that good) and Hornqvist (who also doesn't have a great contract and is worse than Kane) i is wort getting the first round pick (which will be in the back half of the draft. Also could the Sharks really take on that much salary? Especially since they have to resign Labanc in a year and he definitely isn't getting 1 million again. I think overall the sharks reject pretty quickly.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 23, 2019 at 5:16 p.m.
Thread: Ideas Comments
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Poehling</b></div><div>2 years at 3M, Miller gone at 2.5M so it’s basically SB vs Miller + 3rd round pick, +500K, not even a million cause they retained on Sven. Anyways, Boston decline, all good</div></div>

Because I was taking Steen I tried to mitigate some of that loss from Bostons end by 1) giving them a C level prospect (Chatfield) 2) retaining salary on Sven as you mentioned and taking on Millers contract 3) I also tried to lower the risk for Boston by making the 3rd round pick conditional on Sven getting 40 points in which case I think his 3mill contract would be good value for Boston. If he does not meet the condition Boston would give a 7th round pick instead.

Regardless based on the feedback, I think Steen makes the value more lopsided for the Bruins.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 6, 2019 at 3:31 p.m.
Thread: Buffalo Sabres Playoff Team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jasalex</b></div><div>I don't think he is on the block. Cooper stated he could be the next Bergeron. You are right, he is going to be really good. Would love to move Stamkos to left wing and have him take one timers all day. Point Cirelli will be a strong one-two center combination.</div></div>

I think ideally Tampa wouldn't trade him either, but with Point getting close to 8-9 million (likely) I think it would be really hard to fit a player like Cirelli into the fold. Especially if he has a 65-75 point year (which is my prediction for him this season). He could easily ask for 6 million plus and under those circumstance I think Tamapa would kinda be forced to explore its trade options. Honestly as a Canucks fan I think he would be an amazing offer sheet target next year.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 6, 2019 at 3:09 p.m.
Thread: Buffalo Sabres Playoff Team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jasalex</b></div><div>TBL puts you on the do not call list. Hunwick did not even play last year, the cap hit is 1.75. TB buys out Cally at a hit of 2.66. We keep Cirelli and you keep the picks.</div></div>

Lool did not know about Hunwick. Tried to make adjust the trade to make it worth more for Tampa. I think this trade is closer. Pilut is a good 5-6 defensive option and is still fairly young. The picks are a 2nd and a 3rd, which a strong drafting team like Tampa could find some gems with. Also I a depth goalie in Ullmark and a depth winger in Thompson, who has 1st round pedigree and could still turn things around. Still not sure on the value, but I think Cirelli would be a fantastic add to Buffalo. I really think the player could breakout with a bigger role. In my lineup he would eventually take over as 2nd line center over Turris.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 4, 2019 at 1:27 p.m.