BruinsBoy4

Member Since

Apr. 9, 2017

Favourite Team

Boston Bruins

2nd Favourite Team

Buffalo Sabres

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.0

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.

Thread: Eichel to Boston

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>:laugh :laugh An aging David Krejci with one year left as the main piece, Isn't getting you Jack Eichel. That's a pretty meh return for Eichel and Botterill blocks Sweeney's number.</div></div>

If you think Krejci is the main piece I don't know what to tell you.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.

Thread: Eichel to Boston

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>At the end of the day it comes down to what you define as (insert role here). To me a true #1C is a 65+ point player. I don't know that Studnicka can be a consistent 65+ point player. I hope he does, that would be fantastic, but I'm more comfortable saying his upside is a #2C. As for Zboril again depends on what you define as a top 4 d-man. He has the tools, just lacks consistency. I'm not sure I'd say Studnicka/Zboril are "great prospects" but again it all depends on what your definition of great is.</div></div>

Definitely agree. I'm just trying to figure out how much the Bruins would give up and something that could work for the Sabres. This was just for fun. I cant see Buffalo trading Eichel at all.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 5:27 p.m.

Thread: Eichel to Boston

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SalamiCheese</b></div><div>Studnicka is ok, he really seems to be a solid prospect, but here we hardly need the prospects of LD, maybe only if it's some kind of Byram. Would you trade Pastrnak for such a package? I think not. Eichel is our best player and a very good 1C with a six-year contract.</div></div>

I don't see the Sabres trading Eichel at all. Just doing this for fun

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 5:26 p.m.

Thread: Jumping on the Rumor Train

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Right I think he's capable of that too. But that basically makes him Chris Kreider or a poor man's Landeskog at his peak. a nice 2way 50-60ish pts, with most of that being goals winger. Whereas Gaudreau is already offensively peak Marchand at only 3 years older than Debrusk. It's an entirely different tier of player, and as you get up to that tier, the cost grows exponentially. And the difference in cost is worth welll over a late 1st,</div></div>

I agree with you for sure. I just believe Studnicka is a great piece for the future. I would see Vaak working better in my opinion just because people in Boston are pretty high on Stud including me.

Forum: Mock-DraftJun. 9, 2020 at 5:24 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts?

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>the funny thing is everyone in buffalo was convinced we were drafting chychrun</div></div>

Honestly that would have been such a smart pick for them. To bad Nylander didn't work out cause I was a fan of him.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 11:29 a.m.

Thread: Eichel to Boston

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>As a Bruins fan, I don't see why Buffalo would take that.

Krejci - Pending UFA after next year and while still a very good #2C, he's 34yr old.
Studnicka - Solid prospect that looks like he could be a #2C in the future. 200ft player can play in all situation, a good piece
Zboril - I'm not as high on Zboril as others. He's up and down and lacks consistency. Has the tools to be a top 4 d-man, but against struggles with consistency

The picks are more than likely late round picks and while valuable, not ideal for trading a young high end franchise centerman.</div></div>

It depends on what you think of the prospects. I believe Studnicka could be a 1st line center, but that may be a bit optimistic. Zboril I have also liked and think he will be a really solid top 4 d. As for Krejci, I understand why he may not be the best piece going back, but if your getting two great prospects (imo) he can work in the short term.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.

Thread: Eichel to Boston

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SalamiCheese</b></div><div>Not attractive, I think there are teams that will make the offer better. Krejci is already 34 years old, he has NTC and the last year of the contract. a couple of late first and two not bad prospects.</div></div>

It really depends on how you look at the prospects. Studnicka could be a great top 6 center, has the potential to be a first liner. As for Zboril, it was him or Vaak, just went with Zboril. I think he could be a top 4 d.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.

Thread: Jumping on the Rumor Train

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Yes. Can’t tell if you’re underrating Gaudreau or overrating DeBrusk, but seeing your other work it looks like the latter.</div></div>

Just curious, what other work XD. Jake is my favorite player so maybe a bit. But to be completely honest, he can easily be a 30 goal scorer. He came close last season, and this year was just a bit inconsistent. If he brings some consistency to his game, he will brake the 30 goal mark for sure.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 11:11 a.m.

Thread: Jumping on the Rumor Train

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Silkysmooth42</b></div><div>He is a LW bro

Coming from a boston guy, Debrusk + a 1st is probably good value wise, but bruins may need to throw in Kuhlman to really sweeten the deal</div></div>

Na that makes sense. I would do that, but I wouldn't trade Debrusk and stud cause that's to much. But Studnicka is a center man

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2020 at 10:54 a.m.

Thread: Jumping on the Rumor Train

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Yeah I mean you probably start with 1st + Debrusk/Studnicka and then start adding.</div></div>

And start adding? Are you serious? Debrusk is young, has a great chance to be a 30 goal scorer, stundicka made the AHL all rookie team, and is gonna be a top 6 center. And giving up another first doesn't make a ton of sense for Boston.

Forum: Mock-DraftJun. 9, 2020 at 10:39 a.m.

Thread: 2017 Redraft

Even though I love Makar, so far, I think Pettersson goes 1st.
Cal Foote does not move up
Mittelstadt moves way down for sure. Although I still think he has potential, he hasn't shown any signs of him excelling at the NHL level
POJ moves down, Ottinger does not move up that much, and I still think Bruins draft Vaak. He will be a great top 4 d for us in the future

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 7, 2020 at 11:47 a.m.

Thread: Best Cap Position of Atlantic Contenders

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafs_and_Sens_Fan</b></div><div>Cause he was saying that it might be his last game in Boston. He hasnt had any contract negotiations. He went to Detroit during quarenteen.</div></div>

Krug has said multiple times that he doesn't want to leave Boston and that he "hopes he has not played his last game in a bruins uniform". He will be back in Boston 95%, and for us to give up a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, for sergechev over krug, doesn't make any sense. Remember we gave up our first this year and in 2018 so it looks like we will be keeping our pick for next year.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 28, 2020 at 9:54 p.m.

Thread: Eichel trade that bruins might take

I know it's just for fun, but Boston gets robbed her in my opinion

Forum: Mock-DraftMay 17, 2020 at 9:59 a.m.

Thread: First 2 rounds, in order of point %

Pretty solid. As a Bruins fan I cant see them picking a goalie with their first pick just because they have Swayman, Vladar, and Keyser, but everything else is good.

Forum: Mock-DraftMay 17, 2020 at 9:57 a.m.

Thread: My May draft

Personally I see the Kings taking Drysdale with the 4th pick but Raymond is a possibility. I also believe Jack Quinn will be in the top 20 picks.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 17, 2019 at 2:23 p.m.

Thread: Next Year

I'm not sure how we would be able to afford all these contracts especially when you decide to sign Hoffman.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 18, 2019 at 9:48 a.m.

Thread: Lets Goooo

I like pretty much everything you said except a few things. First, I think Fredrick will go 3c and Kuraly will stay 4c. Kuraly was the perfect 4th line center and we don't want to ruin a prospect by putting him on the 4th line. Also I think its unfair that you said Mcavoy needs a reality check. Bergeron's contract was signed many years back and we can use as players contract values have gone up tremendously. I think its fair to say Mcavoy will be in around 7.2mil.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2019 at 10:33 a.m.

Thread: 2018-19 Moves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jiannuccilli</b></div><div>It’s like a broken record. MCAVOY WILL NOT TAKE 6.5 FOR A LONG TERM DEAL.

Edmonton deal isn’t bad, I don’t think they take that though, their forward depth is garbage after the first line

JFK is not playing in Boston next year

If they did do the nuge deal, he would be C3 and coyle would be RW2

Your 4th line is all messed up</div></div>

Nordstrom should be ahead of Kuhlman.

Oilers drafting forward this year, Jesse could try to jump in, D is a bigger need then forwards for them.

Heard JFK could be going to Europe. If he does, Fredrick or Studnicka step in to the 3rd line center spot.

If they did make the Nuge deal, Nuge would not be 3c. Whole point is to pick up a top 6 winger and Nuge would be that guy. Potentially if Studnicka or Fredrick don't step into the lineup, Coyle plays 3C

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2019 at 10:25 a.m.

Thread: Scooby Dubas

We live in a world where Mitch Marner will only be making 3mil more then Kevin Hayes

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 16, 2018 at 10:12 a.m.

Thread: Let the Young guns play

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>Backes isn't a LW HAHAHA</div></div>

then switch him with fricken kuraly. Problem solved.

Forum: Mock-DraftAug. 20, 2018 at 1:47 p.m.

Thread: realistic redo move max 10 spots

Yakupov still way to high. Also Vasilesky should be higher

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2018 at 9:49 a.m.

Thread: Why Not Add Tavares

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>need another forward. You are 1 short. Krejci has to go the following year.

At least send Backes to Vegas, they have plenty of cap space and a roster spot for him

Switch Donato and Heinen

JT is going to get 12 from someone</div></div>

I dont think the Bruins are short one forward. Thats how their fourth line was last year and it was one of the best 4th lines in Hockey.

Forum: Mock-DraftJun. 24, 2018 at 9:10 a.m.

Thread: 2k03

Bergeron should be number one. There is no way that Weber and Getzlaf are better players. Fluery is also to low in my opinion.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 20, 2018 at 5:14 p.m.

Thread: One Trade isn't enought

Cant see the Sabres trading Lehner..... Ulmark is not ready for the starting job and Johnson is a sub par backup. Lehner performed really well for Buffalo this season and he deserves a chance on a good team.

Forum: Mock-DraftJun. 20, 2018 at 8:18 a.m.

Thread: Redoing top 5 in 2014

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>canucksalltheway</b></div><div>Point is way to high</div></div>

sure buddy. Point was the lightnings best center down the stretch and in the playoofs. I know because he killed my team (the Bruins)

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

BruinsBoy4

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day