DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Burnout
Member Since
Jan. 10, 2022
Forum Posts
1686
Posts per Day
2.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 hours ago
Thread:
LAK and PIT become friends
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>K_DaBoss</b></div><div>MTL says thank you for doing business with the Habs and UTAH needs to hit the floor, I actually wouldn't mind keeping Graves - he'll bounce back and play fine in a 3rd pair role with a steady defender. It usually takes a defense man about a season to fully mesh with his new team and he played much better before injury. He just can't seem to gel with offensive, creative D-men in EK65 and Letang.</div></div>
If we're going to apply this logic with the same level of homerism, lets swap the deals to:
-Malkin for one of Utah's 2nds
-Gallagher and a 4th for Karlsson ($2 mil retained)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Trying things
Feels like Fabbro has more value than that return.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>lottsie10</b></div><div>I'm gonna push back and say they accept. Getting a 3rd and a 4th for simply taking on 1.5Mill in cap is a solid deal. Especially for 2 years when playoff contention realistically isn't really in the picture.</div></div>
Its not a value thing, its a roster spot thing. Montreal's got a lot of young D they're in the middle of integrating and if they're adding a vet they'd want someone better and/or with experience and more leadership. Montreal doesn't need mid-round picks either.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 hours ago
Thread:
Calgary - 2024-25 - Off Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Samsquanch14</b></div><div>Yea, he fits the reclamation projects</div></div>
No he doesn't. We don't even know if he'll be allowed to play in the NHL again (probably not next season).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 hours ago
Thread:
hehe
A 3rd probably isn't worth the retention for Montreal right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 hours ago
Thread:
LAK and PIT become friends
That Utah trade is heinous.
Montreal definitely doesn't consider that either.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 7:05 p.m.
Thread:
Rossi and Guhle Revisited
I like Brodin a lot, but he just doesn't make sense for Montreal. As in, he has a lot of value, but not to Montreal.
There's not really a workable trade here for Montreal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 10:22 a.m.
Thread:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Montreal doesn’t want Dubois. He is one of the biggest cap dump in the league. It would cost Byfield just to move him</div></div>
I don't think either of those things are necessarily true, but likely the only way Montreal would make a trade for Dubois is:
-that there is retention so that he doesn't have a higher cap hit than Caufield and Suzuki
-Montreal sends someone like Anderson the other way
-Montreal isn't giving up any quality futures
LA should just buy Dubois out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 3:53 p.m.
Thread:
hmmmm
Eberle just signed a new contract and Montreal is not going to be trading for declining veteran wingers when they still haven't gotten rid of the ones they have.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 3:06 p.m.
Thread:
Another Rossi Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>You traded young dman Romanov to get Dach</div></div>
That trade was explicitly made because of the current management's opinion of Guhle. Montreal doesn't have a D prospect who replaces what Guhle provides, whereas Guhle did replace what Romanov provided.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 12:00 p.m.
Thread:
Trading up with Marky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EvanW711</b></div><div>I was under the impression from Habs fans online that their biggest need was Wingers. But youre right they could do anything with that pick</div></div>
Montreal's biggest need is probably center, but forwards is applicable because they have guys who play both positions. Specifically they want size and elite offensive talent. But that's also the tiebreaker when drafting.
Either way, Calgary doesn't really have the ability to make the trade without overpaying in futures.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 10:02 a.m.
Thread:
Trading up with Marky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EvanW711</b></div><div>What do you think MTL would want for their 1st? They'd be using that pick to get a winger and would be getting 2 in this trade, Kuzy is a top 6 winger right now and coronato has the potential to become one as well.</div></div>
People thought Montreal would take a center with their 2022 1st and a forward with their 2023 1st. No one knows exactly who Montreal will use that pick for.
They're obviously not going to even consider moving that pick for a rental winger with big question marks and an undersized prospect/young NHLer that hasn't done much yet and doesn't address a need for Montreal. Realistically, the only thing Calgary could offer for Montreal's 2024 1st is their own plus future(s) that would address a need for Montreal and the quality of which would be painful to give up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 9:56 a.m.
Thread:
2025 Maple Leafs
None of those trades are salvagable and most of the UFA signings are unrealistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 2:18 p.m.
Thread:
Marner
The first trade is pretty interesting, but I don't every player agrees to it.
Montreal obviously passes on that trade though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 10:56 a.m.
Thread:
Lets hear it
-Edmonton has almost no cap flexibility next offseason (less than 10 mil to fill 6-9 spots). Jarnkrok has too much term at a non-buriable cap-hit to make sense for them.
-Saros is both a better goalie than Kuemper was and is better regarded, Nashville would probably need a better offer (and will likely get one)
-I doubt Montreal would be interested enough in Cowan to make that move.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 10:50 a.m.
Thread:
depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>Contrary to popular belief if you actually want Ostlund, you’re going to have to pay something you don’t want to.</div></div>
OP is a Sabres fan, Montreal probably doesn't want to move Barron and also probably don't "actually" want Östlund.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 10:09 a.m.
Thread:
Not sure man
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JackSC87</b></div><div>My reason mostly involves similar reasons for departing with Edmunsson last year. MTL has a lot of young dmen coming up who needs time to develop, and by the time they're a competing team Savard is likely a highly depreciated asset. Of course, Savard is better than Edmunsson so he will more than likely get a better return then what I chose here but who knows for sure I just thought that a vet defensive dman might help someone like Graves get back on his game.</div></div>
Montreal values Savard more than Edmundson, especially since their LD depth was/is much greater than RD depth. Montreal was also in a position where they also needed the cap space flexibility last offseason, which they don't this offseason. Its not really worth it for Montreal just from a retention standpoint unless they REALLY like Lucius, let alone moving Savard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 4:00 p.m.
Thread:
Things that make you go HMMMMMMMMMMM
That's an incredibly high ask for a player with cap hit, trade protection and reputation. At least from a rebuilding team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 2:34 p.m.
Thread:
Not sure man
Zero reason Montreal would consider this trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 25 at 2:19 p.m.
Thread:
Holtz Rossi Guhle three way
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Here's my question: do we know that the Habs are definitely thinking 2C with their 24 1st? I'm genuinely asking to learn the answer you guys surely know better than me.</div></div>
I'll answer. At the press conference after Montreal's season finished, Montreal's GM heavily hinted that, all things being equal, they'd go forward over defenseman (i.e. if they think the prospects are close, they'll go forward). That doesn't necessarily mean center, but they like guys who can play center.
I don't think that has anything to do with why Montreal wouldn't look at acquiring a guy like Rossi though. They have young players who can and have played center already, they just need them to get healthy (Dach) and maintain (and continue) their growth (Newhook). Rossi doesn't make sense for Montreal as a trade target.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 25 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Holtz Rossi Guhle three way
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>Why is Montreal making this move? They're about to draft a better forward than Rossi and Holtz with their 1st and don't have to give up Guhle to do it</div></div>
Even if they don't, Montreal can't really move Guhle right now as they don't have a replacement.
This deal seems to make even less sense to the Wild though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 24 at 10:33 a.m.
Thread:
Continue Rebuild
You could take out every piece Montreal is sending and they still would block Briere's number. Taking on Couturier's contract is an awful idea and he doesn't fit what Montreal needs/wants at all.
Honestly, the Dallas, Buffalo and Montreal deals are way off.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 23 at 3:40 p.m.
Thread:
GMKALindy 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1986</b></div><div>Agreed. Even a 2nd round pick is pushing it. I just believe Montreal, and fans think he is simply untouchable.</div></div>
I don't think that's actually true, but Montreal definitely wouldn't trade him for Jokiharju. Montreal probably wouldn't have interest in Jokiharju period tbh.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 6:11 p.m.
Thread:
slight changes
Ignoring NTCs, I think Montreal, Detroit and San Jose all pass pretty easily.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 1:55 p.m.
Thread:
Blues and Montreal fans thoughts
Hate it from a Montreal perspective. Not only do I prefer around 2-4 forwards in the draft to Snuggerud, I'd rather just take the D-man and try to trade for a prospect that better fits Montreal's needs than Snuggerud.
You're also severely underestimating how long D usually take to develop if you think any from this draft will be a top pair D in 1 to 2 years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 10:04 a.m.
Thread:
Dubas wont but
Hughes and Blake wouldn't either.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com