DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Friendly_Giant
Try, try, again
Member Since
Oct. 8, 2020
Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
2nd Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
139
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 20, 2022 at 3:05 p.m.
Thread:
Edmonton Roughnecks 5
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Friendly_Giant</b></div><div>That would also work, and you're right. There's not an Armchair GM anywhere on Cap Friendly, on any team, who will take Barrie even if he was being given away for "future considerations". In reality, there's probably a half dozen teams who would love to have him. I chose Buffalo because they have a ton of cap space and little to no real firepower to speak of.</div></div> TBH, there are probably ONLY a half dozen NHL GM who would not give up an asset for Barrie if they had the cap space.
He may have defensive faults, but he is an elite offensive defenseman, and ONLY 15 defenseman scored points at a faster rate than he did last year.
Given the opportunity, it is doubtful that Karmanos would pass on Barrie if he only cost a prospect who had the value of 3rd round pick.
If Holland put him on waivers, you can be certain a team would snatch him up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2022 at 6:02 p.m.
Thread:
One trade and One Sign of UFA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Skyraider112</b></div><div>I doubt you have to pay a team to take Foegele.</div></div>
I would ideally like to not have to pay anyone to take him. But seeing what Bjorkstrand went for makes me think the market is a lot harder to entice people to take on cash. I really wish Foegs would have lit it up last year so there isn't so much thought on who needs to be cut. Someone has to go and I don't think it is Barrie. I am guessing between Foegs and JP.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 6, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
Thread:
Giroux to Edmonton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>he was only a healthy scratch because the foot injury wasnt disclosed and then long COVID issues</div></div>
I'm not sure what part of that justifies why Edmonton would pay significantly more to reacquire someone they moved for less just last year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 6, 2022 at 12:39 p.m.
Thread:
Giroux to Edmonton
Oilers fans need to stop their obsession with Bear. Hot damn.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 6, 2022 at 12:10 p.m.
Thread:
Giroux to Edmonton
I would also be shocked if Keith doesn't play. From everything insiders are saying it sounds like he'll probably be playing next year. Also I wonder if Giroux is going to cost over 5.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 6, 2022 at 11:53 a.m.
Thread:
Giroux to Edmonton
So last offseason we sent bear out for foegele this offseason going to trade a significantly better player for bear back? Wasn't he a healthy scratch multiple times last year? I don't see how he skyrocketed in value. I also don't think after the nonsense bear had to go threw in Edmonton he would be that open to coming back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 29, 2022 at 4:55 p.m.
Thread:
Forget about Kane
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Quillanrocks</b></div><div>I don't disagree with you; I dread to think what $$ and term Seattle may be stuck with if Francis goes hard after Klingberg and would prefer they pivot elsewhere if too rich and too long. (God knows his first 3 BIG signings aren't looking too good!!) But Klingberg can defend and has a history with Oleksiak, so I get the appeal if I'm Francis. And I just hesitate to spend draft picks on players who aren't sure to be a fit for this team how it is currently designed. Barrie doesn't seem like the guy. He ran the PP with 2 of the top 5 players on earth. His numbers are inflated and no one would ever confuse him for a defender that you'd trust to preserve a lead!! Nothing about Seattle's roster says "that's the guy to make the team better." JMO!</div></div>
we get it, you would rather pay way more for a player who also has defensive warts to his game in klingberg rather than trade a late 2nd and 4th or a early second.
2nd and 4th rounders have a much lower chance of making the NHL and the rumored 3 million more that klingberg wants is also likely a factor. THe seattle PP is not great, their offense from the blue line is not great on the right side.
The fact that the majority of seattles dmen are defensively minded means that yes, most ppl look at the d corps and say it would improve it to have a puck moving pp quarterback who can make a nice zone exit pass and join the play.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 29, 2022 at 3:20 p.m.
Thread:
Forget about Kane
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Quillanrocks</b></div><div>I don't disagree with you; I dread to think what $$ and term Seattle may be stuck with if Francis goes hard after Klingberg and would prefer they pivot elsewhere if too rich and too long. (God knows his first 3 BIG signings aren't looking too good!!) But Klingberg can defend and has a history with Oleksiak, so I get the appeal if I'm Francis. And I just hesitate to spend draft picks on players who aren't sure to be a fit for this team how it is currently designed. Barrie doesn't seem like the guy. He ran the PP with 2 of the top 5 players on earth. His numbers are inflated and no one would ever confuse him for a defender that you'd trust to preserve a lead!! Nothing about Seattle's roster says "that's the guy to make the team better." JMO!</div></div>
Well both Tippett and woodcroft have used Barrie late in games to hold leads and woodcroft actually moved Barrie onto the pk when it was struggling to snap out of it. The reputation about Barrie not being able to defend are very much over blown and inaccurate. That being said not suggesting he's a shut down type definitely a playmaker more than defender but much more capable than most on this site will credit him for. Kinda like how you pointed out he ran a pp with two extremely talented players personally don't think it's right to view it in a way that takes away from giving the credit earned. Multiple other players have ran that pp over the years klef nurse bouch but with Barrie it hit historic heights for extended period of time. The perception of Barrie on this site just seems well off what it should be in my opinion.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 23, 2022 at 4:13 p.m.
Thread:
ideal offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gary_gobbler</b></div><div>oh nevermind i see what your saying, barries defensive end lacks a lot, and his offensive production has dropped off. No need for him anymore especially with bouchard.</div></div>
Does nobody pay attention Barrie just had a very solid year was much better defensively than his first year in Edmonton I'd say most consistent d threw the playoffs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 23, 2022 at 4:15 p.m.
Thread:
ideal offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Barrie isn’t very good. Everyone would want Brown on their team</div></div>
Since when has Barrie not been good? He has an excellent resume.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Jun. 23, 2022 at 4:17 p.m.
Thread:
McJesus Need a Cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SMH</b></div><div>Habs don't need barrie when they can have better and cheaper alternatives from FA or waivers, they can't afford his contract anyway and allen is staying unless a team wants to overpay for some reason</div></div>
Are you suggesting can do better than barrie threw waivers? That might be the most illogical statement made on this site
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 5:23 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jack_</b></div><div>I assume this is because some people laugh at a kid who trades a certain RW on the leafs who makes around a million more then he should for absolutely nothing. Dont be that guy and you will have no problems on this site.</div></div>
Isnt this the exact kind of post OP is referring to? Obnoxious targeting comments meant to undermine another person's opinions?
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:54 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
There are certain posters that only come on here to dump on everyone's ACGM. This is just for fun, you can criticize an ACGM you don't agree with, but do it politely. Realistically though, none of us have any idea of what player values are.
I remember the old days where you could give each ACGM a rating out of 5 and people would give just about every post a 1 star out of 5.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:53 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
Agreed. Constructive feedback helps us all get better at this and helps build a positive community. Challenging each others ideas is fine and a great way to learn more about how other fans think when it comes to hockey -- but it should always remain civil. We are all different ages and have varying experience with hockey and the NHL. At the end of the day, we're all here to just have fun and talk with other hockey fans.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:53 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mitch1_6</b></div><div>Ik. They pollute this site so badly.</div></div>
Like there's a difference between new ideas and just complete troll posts, as well as they just go around running their mouths. It's sad but I guess that's just how it is.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:52 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MaxDomi13</b></div><div>Well said, but I have one question.
Why are all Habs fans RD? :laugh
I'm kidding. My real question is should we tag Banks to see his thoughts on this?</div></div>
I think the mods and admins need to be more proactive in removing hate comments/posts as well as troll posts / accounts so yes
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:50 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
100% agree with what you're saying.
I just wish there wasn't a large amount of trolls on here. We see a lot of people making troll teams to try and stir the pot / start arguments. We also see a lot of trolls going around to posts leaving just idiotic comments trying to start arguments.
I think the mods/admins on here need to start being more proactive in removing these troll users and their posts, because I see a lot of them
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:49 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
my thoughts exactly.
this site is too toxic sometimes.
we should all just be friends 🥺
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:46 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
Amen
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jul. 20, 2020 at 12:33 p.m.
Thread:
Rules Update [July 20, 2020]: Posting "We laugh at that offer" or "The phone was hung up on you" will result in an infraction
It is now considered trolling to reply to a post by claiming a team would hang up, or laugh at you, examples include:
"ANA laughs at that offer"
"If I were GM I'd hang up the phone on you"
"We laugh you out of the room"
These posts promote argument and are intended to insult the user, they are not considered constructive criticism and will result in an infraction.
You can review the rules here: <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/54584" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/54584</a>
Forum:
Site Discussion
Jun. 30, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
Thread:
Dear CapFriendly Community - Please Read
I feel like someone needs to say something.
In the comment sections, people are being bashed, belittled, and made out to be idiots.
Why? Because that unique person came up with a new idea. Maybe they don’t know that much about the team, but they made an ACGM about a new idea. Then because of that idea, they are made to be idiots in front of the whole CapFriendly community. While sometimes the posts are preposterous, you don’t need to belittle a person for trying a new idea.
Instead, just kindly tell them what’s wrong with it, and if you’re a fan of that team, tell them a “counteroffer” of some sort. From experience, when someone does that, it’s a lot more constructive and helps me personally learn about player values/ other teams needs. It’s a lot better than responses like: “lol” “what a piece of Garbage” “you know nothing” etc.
That’s my piece.
Thank you for reading.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Sep. 12, 2020 at 7:43 p.m.
Thread:
There is a problem with this website: a Thread
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rodzikhockey93</b></div><div>This is a website for creativity and a cool learning tool. Why is it immposible to post a creative roster without having people that hide behind memes bashing them.</div></div>
You don't have to take the comments seriously, it's just another persons opinion.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Sep. 14, 2020 at 3:01 a.m.
Thread:
There is a problem with this website: a Thread
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Yojimbo</b></div><div>I have seen usernames like "SuspendedAgain" or whatever and in the profile it says "I use this username when my regular one is suspended" Granted, it's been a while since I saw those, but they were/are here.</div></div>
There are also definitely troll accounts on here. You'll see an AGM from what appears to be a spanking new user, but then they'll converse with others talking about previous opinions from those people. It's not subtle.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Mar. 25, 2021 at 1:29 p.m.
Thread:
Idea - The ability to do multiple years of ACGM in one post
Would anyone else like this feature? I figure this would be very difficult to add but I'll share the idea anyway
When I want to make an ACGM for the next 2 seasons (a 2021-22 part, and a 2022-23 part), it takes a lot of additional effort. For example, as an Oilers fan, I sign RNH to a 6 year deal on the 2021-22 post, and then have to sign him to the same deal at 5 seasons on the 2022-23 post. So on the 2022-23 post, I have to resign all the guys I signed in the 2021-22 post a 2nd time with one less year on their deal, and sign all of the guys I want to keep who expired in 2022-23. Some people like to layout a hypothetical plan for multiple seasons, and a feature that lets you do that easier would be helpful
This is how I see this feature working. Say I wanted to do an ACGM for this season, until the 2022-23 season. Maybe I do a few deadline moves during the 2020-21 season. When I'm done with the current season, I can click a button that says "Next Season" or something like that. Everyone's contracts would lose 1 year as we move to the next season. I would resign, trade, create that season's lines, and once again click the "Next Season" button, and the cycle can repeat. You could go back and forth between seasons to change parts of the plan, each season having it's own page. For people viewing the post, there could be a section for each season, with trades, lines, cap breakdown, etc.. from each individual year, to clearly show what happened in each season (trades, signings, etc..) The comment section would be under the single post containing multiple seasons so people can discuss the multi-year plan in once place
Forum:
Site Discussion
May 6, 2021 at 8:37 p.m.
Thread:
Two Months In: My Experience on CapFriendly (so far)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bobcat205</b></div><div>I found and signed up for this website exactly 2 months and a day ago as i write this. It's kept me in a good state of mind through the back end of my freshman year of high school where things are gonna get insane real fast (I do understand that it's only gonna get worse in the next few years). I've met a few people around here that i could reasonably call "acquaintances" or even friends, and i look forward to making more as i spend more time here. Aside from a few bad apples (every single community has some), the community is very welcoming and kind. I fully intend to stay here for a very long time. Thank y'all so much.
Sincerely,
Bobcat</div></div>
Sometimes people get overly protective of their teams and views and lose sight of the fact everyone here is a hockey fan. Good luck in high school and don’t be afraid to ask questions in school and here.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com