SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

GenericUsername489

GenericUsername489
Member Since
Jun. 27, 2019
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
638
Posts per Day
0.4
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2021 at 11:47 p.m.
Thread: Hintz value read the description to give an opinion
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jet11567</b></div><div>Only way you get Hintz is if it’s for Caufield or Suzuki</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterForsberg21</b></div><div>Yup your right that is not enough, Hintz is a legit top 6 center that can do it all. Don't see a contending team like Dallas moving him.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EsoYeezus69</b></div><div>If you want Hintz it’ll cost Suzuki+, and I’m 100% serious.</div></div>

Yeah, if Kotkaniemi wouldn't work as a starting point there's no way a deal would ever get done, even in my imagination. Totally understand since Hintz is a stud.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>And 100% dumb 🤷‍♂️
People can say Lucic would cost Suzuki and being serious
But realistically Suzuki &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Hintz</div></div>

Right now, Hintz has shown to be the better player in the regular season but Suzuki's killing it in the playoffs, he's younger and his upside is higher. There's definitely an argument on both sides.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 15, 2021 at 1:37 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 30, 2021 at 12:41 a.m.
Thread: LEAFS IN 6 THEY SAID
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>This is false and not the rule.

Again, on the replay you can see Campbell looking at Perry as he's putting the puck in the net. So he was clearly aware of where the puck was.

Also, the rule does not state anything about a goaltenders "chance" of making the save. It clearly states that if a player interferes with the goaltender's ability to freely move in the crease or defend the goal by his positioning, then it is in fact goaltender interference.

Facts:
1. Toffoli entered the crease by himself
2. Toffoli was blocking Campbell's path/ability to make the save or attempt to make the save
3. That blocking of the path directly affected Campbell from making the save

It's all right in the rulebook. It's goalie interference. 100%</div></div>

You can't interfere with something that doesn't happen. Once again, if Campbell doesn't attempt to make it to his net, there is no "path or ability" to make a save. It's like talking to a wall. Enjoy crying yourself to sleep I guess.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 30, 2021 at 12:33 a.m.
Thread: LEAFS IN 6 THEY SAID
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>Directly from the NHL's rulebook:

"Goals will only be disallowed <strong>if an attacking player, either by his positioning or by making contact with the goalie, interferes with the goalie's ability to freely move in the crease/defend the goal</strong>, or a player initiates deliberate contact with the goaltender, within in the crease or out of it."


So yes. By NHL definition that is goalie interference. Toffoli entered the crease by himself and blocked the path of Campbell to get to the puck when it was loose in the crease. If you actuakkt watch the replay, Campbell is staring at Perry as he puts the puck in the net so he knew where it was but didn't have a path to get to it.

It was goalie interference. Should not have counted.</div></div>

Campbell never attempted to make it back to the net though. He didn't know where the puck was until too late. That's the point! If Campbell turns around and shows any sort of effort to make it back, then Toffoli is in the way and it is goalie interference. Campbell was taking his sweet time since he last saw the puck in the area where he was sitting. By the time Campbell discovered the puck, it had already left Perry's stick and Campbell had no play even if Toffoli wasn't standing there.

"If you actually watch the replay" get outta here
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 30, 2021 at 12:20 a.m.
Thread: LEAFS IN 6 THEY SAID
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>Leafs didn't show up till the final minutes, but it's still funny how arrogant Canadiens fans can be when they had to have the refs literally hand them the game to score.

Without the bs non goalie interference call on the first "goal", that game is entirely different.</div></div>

You genuinely think that was goalie interference?

1. Players are allowed to skate in the crease

2. Campbell left the crease purposely

3. Campbell never attempted to get back in the crease

4. There was no contact between Toffoli and Campbell

5. By the time Campbell found the puck in the mess, Perry had already shot it and Campbell was way too far away to do anything about it.

It was a really dumb challenge by Keefe and he got punished.