SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

JEFE

MD
Member Since
Jun. 27, 2017
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
60
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 25, 2020 at 12:52 p.m.
Thread: please
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheLastOfUs</b></div><div>Mtl doesn't do that. Although gauthier would be a nice add with his size he is still an unproven prospect, habs don't need another C prospect so the move from 16th to 22nd just isnt worth it.</div></div>

I think that julien Gauthier and lias anderson are more than enough to offset the dropping of 6 spots
even though Lias is a center prospect hes a good prospect with grit and 2 way play could possibly replace Danault if Phillip doesnt want to stay due to KK and Suzuki emergence
( i personnaly aint sold on KK's hockey sense and think he might be better suited at wing with his decent speed and nice release but we ll see )

. Julien Gauthier is at worst a 4th line gritty physical winger but potentially a joel armia type player with better hands and much more nastiness sprinkled on top .
unless a top 10 player like sanderson quinn holtz type prospects falls to 16th i wouldnt mind targetting a guy like rodion amirov or connor zary with the 22nd
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 15, 2020 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread: Pegging
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>corson</b></div><div>I wouldn't worry about the 10th OA pick, we are not rebuilding anymore. Apparently.
From what I'm reading, Bergevin is going all in this season.
So we aren't looking for picks, in fact i'm hearing that we are trading our pick.
Basically we are looking at one of the teams going with a low internal cap like Florida, and we are going to trade our 1st + prospects for a high end scoring winger.
Not sure if this is true but it seems to be the way MB is leaning</div></div>

even if he does try and trade his pick and prospects for a high scoring winger getting a 10oa for domi isnt a bad move at all . theres not much room for domi at c and if they add a high scoring winger theres not much room for him on the wings either . if habs can add a scoring RW and trade Domi to get a pick like maybe a sanderson shneider or quinn at 10th oa maybe they still have enough cap room to get aggressive on Hall and the top 9 could look like this


Hall Kotkaniemi Caufield
Drouin Suzuki NEW RW
Tatar Danault Galagher

eh a man can dream ...
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 26, 2020 at 8:43 a.m.
Thread: Whats The Asking Price For Danault
IMO if Danault gets moved it ll be for a huge offer

Mtl can easily have him play with Gallagher and Tatar if Tomas stays and still have Suzuki with Drouin and maybe Caufield or armia or a free agent signing whatever .

so Phil get his top6 spot and signs a new contract and a year or so later is slowly pushed down the lineup BY KK .

KK had OK playoffs and showed much improvement but he played in the AHL most of the year and is 20 years old he hasnt past Danault yet just because he got 1 more point than Danault in 10 playoff games ...

saying Danault will be traded and his value is diminished becuase hes said he feels he still a top 6 center and isnt ready to give his top line spot up yet is ridiculous Laine said the same thing a few years back would the Jets let him go for Byron and Armia ?
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 11, 2020 at 11:35 a.m.
Thread: Cmon Habs fan
I like Sergachev , not sure hes a top pair D though and at 8,5m he better be i think as good as he is his numbers are inflated by the team he plays on and surrounded by McDonaugh and Hedman . but half his Pts came on the PP and his +- is helped by the fact hes not on the top pairing. still think hes solid and wish we hadnt traded him for drouin but 8.5 seems steep at the same time might be what is needed to get him out of TB although honestly I cant see how Bergevin makes that offer and effectively admitting he ****ed up traded him.

Top 10 pick if availlable in trade I think Nashville and maybe minesota but Winnipeg at the forefront for sure and the pick should be Sanderson (although not as much if you sign Sergachev and have Romanov coming up) the other is Jack Quinn or if a raymond or holtz or rossi for some ****ed up reason drop to 10th
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2017 at 3:12 p.m.
Thread: EASY AS PIE
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JEFE</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CameronLeafs</b></div><div>If I'm not mistaken, you would be giving up 4 first rounders to Edmonton as if the length of the contract is over 5 years, it is the total cap hit divided by 5 to determine to compensation given.
So in this case 8 x 9,100,000 = 72,800,000. 72,800,000 / 5 = 14,560,000. So you guys would be put in the highest compensation bracket and I doubt you would be willing to give up 4 1sts for Draisaitl. (Source: <a href="http://mynhltraderumors.com/2017-nhl-offer-sheet-draft-compensation-for-signing-restricted-free-agents-2008-2017/2017/06/02/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://mynhltraderumors.com/2017-nhl-offer-sheet-draft-compensation-for-signing-restricted-free-agents-2008-2017/2017/06/02/</a> )</div></div>

possible i didnt check but last time i checked last spring between 7.250 and 9.150 was 2 1rst and 2 2nd but still looking at the habs last 8 years 1 rst rd pick i cant say i wouldnt give 4 of them for draisaitl</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JEFE</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CameronLeafs</b></div><div>If I'm not mistaken, you would be giving up 4 first rounders to Edmonton as if the length of the contract is over 5 years, it is the total cap hit divided by 5 to determine to compensation given.
So in this case 8 x 9,100,000 = 72,800,000. 72,800,000 / 5 = 14,560,000. So you guys would be put in the highest compensation bracket and I doubt you would be willing to give up 4 1sts for Draisaitl. (Source: <a href="http://mynhltraderumors.com/2017-nhl-offer-sheet-draft-compensation-for-signing-restricted-free-agents-2008-2017/2017/06/02/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://mynhltraderumors.com/2017-nhl-offer-sheet-draft-compensation-for-signing-restricted-free-agents-2008-2017/2017/06/02/</a> )</div></div>

possible i didnt check but last time i checked last spring between 7.250 and 9.150 was 2 1rst and 2 2nd but still looking at the habs last 8 years 1 rst rd pick i cant say i wouldnt give 4 of them for draisaitl</div></div>

following your own link the cut off is between 7.851 and 9.814 mil is two 1st and two 2nd above 9.814 then its four 1rst
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2017 at 3:01 p.m.
Thread: EASY AS PIE
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CameronLeafs</b></div><div>If I'm not mistaken, you would be giving up 4 first rounders to Edmonton as if the length of the contract is over 5 years, it is the total cap hit divided by 5 to determine to compensation given.
So in this case 8 x 9,100,000 = 72,800,000. 72,800,000 / 5 = 14,560,000. So you guys would be put in the highest compensation bracket and I doubt you would be willing to give up 4 1sts for Draisaitl. (Source: <a href="http://mynhltraderumors.com/2017-nhl-offer-sheet-draft-compensation-for-signing-restricted-free-agents-2008-2017/2017/06/02/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://mynhltraderumors.com/2017-nhl-offer-sheet-draft-compensation-for-signing-restricted-free-agents-2008-2017/2017/06/02/</a> )</div></div>

possible i didnt check but last time i checked last spring between 7.250 and 9.150 was 2 1rst and 2 2nd but still looking at the habs last 8 years 1 rst rd pick i cant say i wouldnt give 4 of them for draisaitl