DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Jded
Member Since
Jun. 20, 2016
Favourite Team
Anaheim Ducks
Forum Posts
2746
Posts per Day
1.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 hours ago
Thread:
PUBLISH
This is not it for ANA. Gudas is going nowhere, full stop. And the Ducks need someone who can play top 4 (if not top 2) RD, which is neither of those two trade targets. A number of FAs hitting the market they can shoot for
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 hours ago
Thread:
24-25 leafs
You think the answer to TOR’s playoff woes is adding someone who outright said he didn’t want to play there?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 hours ago
Thread:
Dreaming but semi-realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CHAR</b></div><div>Cause that's what the tool says that much cap relief is worth...
https://puckpedia.com/CapRelief
Like I said, that is putting the contract into a vacuum and ignoring the player completely. Go the other direction.... if you were to trade a pick(s) only for Skinner the player ignoring contract what value would you put on him? I honestly don't know what value I'd give him but I don't think I'd trade a 24th overall draft pick for him. I don't know, maybe he is worth that much.
Where he breaks down a bit for me is if he is a 50-60 point player or an 80 point player? He's scored 50-ish points in a season a lot more often than he has 80. You should be able to get a 50 point player in free agency without giving up any value. Is he really all that much better 7M than Vatrano was last season 3.6M? Would you trade a 24th OA pick for Vatrano? I wouldn't.</div></div>
I’m not sure I’m buying the tool’s valuation on this one at all. Like you said, Cap relief isn’t made in a vacuum here, there’s a player that comes along with it who has very material value. We’re not simply retaining $7M. We’re taking on $7M and then getting roughly 30 goals and 30 assists per year. Those are very different things. Would we use Puckpedia to evaluate Terry’s trade value as a $7M cap relief?
I’d argue that Vatrano isn’t a good comp at all either. If he had the year he just had before FA, he’d cost a heck of a lot more than $3.7M to sign. It’s incredibly rare and lucky to find a 35 goal scorer in FA for under $4M, he’s a huge outlier
Frankly, the idea that you could go from 28th to 11th while adding a ~60pt scorer at a position of need on what would be a maybe $1.5M-$2M overpriced contract for 3 years seems outrageously favorable to ANA imo if anything.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Dreaming but semi-realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>Many Sabres fans here think that Skinner is cancer and we have to get rid of him. I’m in the minority it seems, understanding that he doesn’t need to go anywhere. Aside from the fact his full no movement clause means he can just say no to a trade anywhere. It doesn’t do Buffalo any good to burn money and get nothing for it, and late firsts don’t do much for a team with a loaded prospect pool. This just doesn’t work for Buffalo.</div></div>
I don’t disagree at all. Thanks for sharing
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Dreaming but semi-realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>If we are gonna use the 7 million from skinners non retention to go after a bigger fish, then yes. If pegula is just gonna pocket it and play a rookie, then no
So, no.</div></div>
Super reasonable
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Dreaming but semi-realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CHAR</b></div><div>Your compensation for 7M of Skinner over 3 years is way light using PuckPedia's tools. The Ducks should be getting the value of a 9th OA draft pick for that contract and the difference between the Buffalo #11 and the picks from the Ducks is only 24 OA. The BUF pick alone with no picks going back isn't enough if we're talking about a pure cap dump. I guess you are giving Skinner as a player some value to off set, but I still think the Ducks lose a lot of value here.
I slotted the Edmonton pick at 28 since we won't know where exactly that pick is for a few weeks. FWIW.</div></div>
Hey hey Char! Help me understand why Skinner would cost a 9OA to move at $7M. He has 92 - 99 -191 in 233 games over the past 3 seasons
For context, none of us are upset about Terry’s $7M, and he has 80 - 102 - 182 in 221
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Sabres over the hump4
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JokiStan</b></div><div>Your team employs John Gibson</div></div>
Sorry, is your argument that because we have one bad contract already, we should just hoard as my of them as possible?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Sabres over the hump4
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>I don't think they should do it, just funny to see the demand for 3 1sts and then some to take on his contract (he had 82 points in the season that ended 12 months ago)</div></div>
Yeah I don’t personally agree with that viewpoint. At his full cap hit I see it more as just a non-starter. The BUF 1st rounder is super interesting to me (I love Helenius and see a great Yakemchuk fit for ANA, one of whom should be available at 11OA). I could see it being considered with some retention
What about something like:
BUF: Skinner $2M retained + 11OA
ANA : EDM 1st
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Sabres over the hump4
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>That's funny.
Skinner has performed far closer to his contract than gibson has and Anaheim fans on here were turning down 1st round picks for him</div></div>
ANA fan who’s been wanting to trade Gibby for years here. I see no way they take Skinner.
The last year of his deal is the one that makes it a non-starter. All of Leo, Gauthier, McTavish, Mintyukov, Zellweger, Luneau, Colangelo will come off ELCs, and Zegras will also need a new contract.
1 year less and for the ‘24 BUF 1st it’d be worth considering. But it just isn’t worth risking the ability to retain a core piece, and it’ll absolutely become a problem then
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:16 a.m.
Thread:
Chicago - 2024-25 - Off Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Taylor Raddysh is a nice prospect at a position of need for the Ducks (RW) who seems to have taken a step backwards this season. However, Anaheim's other position of need is RD, so we won't be trading away our best RD prospect.</div></div>
Raddysh is 26 years old now. Your response was honestly too kind, this offer would be like us suggesting Max Jones for Korchinski (a bit of an exaggeration, but makes the point)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:16 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuilding Every Nhl Team 6
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>We'd love to <strong>add</strong> Necas to play <strong>with</strong> Zegras, not exchange one for the other.</div></div>
I’m honestly not into him. On his current contract he’s awesome. But he’s going to get a pay day that I don’t see him living up to. His production is just fine, but his advanced stats are really scary
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 10:07 p.m.
Thread:
Another would they
I’ll join the ANA consensus here. Despite playing a position of need, Lilj is a bad fit and I’d have zero interest in him in ANA. The RD need is a big defensive minded top 2 capable RD to partner with Minty and/or Zellweger.
Robo could maybe be interesting for ANA at the trade deadline to fill Vatrano’s shoes after they move him. But he isn’t close to enticing enough to move Vatrano for. We’ll take a late first type return like we got for Henrique
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 10:01 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuilding Every Nhl Team 6
Yeah I don’t think you’ll find a single ANA fan who’s into this swap, regardless of the pick compensation to even it out (which is comically going the wrong direction)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 8:38 p.m.
Thread:
Marner
Gibson outright said he won’t play in TOR and has a NTC, and ANA would absolutely not retain $10M on him either
No issue moving the rest of that package for him, but probably not enough for TOR
All this becomes irrelevant if ANA drafts Demidov, locking him and Terry into their top 6 long term
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 8:35 p.m.
Thread:
Offseason
I don’t think you’re going to find a single ANA fan in favor of moving Zegras for Marner
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 8:33 p.m.
Thread:
another brick in the Woll
I don’t expect ANA to have any interest in Lilj
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 5:16 p.m.
Thread:
Ducks 202425
I see zero incentive for ANA to make that trade with STL, and no reason for Utah to want McGinn for anything
These would be disappointing RD additions in my opinion as well, but might be where we wind up
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 5:13 p.m.
Thread:
What I would do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Ottawa wants to dump him to clear cap and because he is perpetually injured, and I believe it's been a repeat injury a few times now (same shoulder)</div></div>
Got it. Definitely doesn’t sound appealing for ANA, where a Zegras trade really only makes sense if it’s to address a different need positionally in the case of a Celebrini/Lindstrom draft addition
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 4:26 p.m.
Thread:
Offseason Attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Do you feel as a somewhat undersized speedy winger that his game will be hampered with significantly less room to operate on North American Ice? That's my concern with those type of players, defenses are more spread out on euro ice.
I also am doubtful we win the second lottery and move up to two, it seems the consensus 1-3 is Celebrini, Demidiv, then Leshunov. I know I've turned hotter on Parekh, especially with the connection to Mintyukov, but it really comes down to where our pick lands. If we drop to 4 or 5 Verbeek s got more latitude to pick a riskier but more rewarding guy, if we pick at 2 or 3 you kind of have to go with the guy you know will hit, even if it's not the highest ceiling in the class. You can "lose" the pick at two by taking a guy who should have gone 5th in a redraft, but you can't loose at 2 by taking a guy who busts.</div></div>
I’m honestly not concerned. Plenty of examples of speedy wingers who find success here with far less skill. His hands and offensive IQ are so elite he still seems to have no problem operating when there’s little-to-no space. Is he ready for the NHL right now at his weight? No. But he’s 5’11, thats not necessarily an undersized frame, but it’s on that cusp
For ceiling/floor I think Celebrini tops both, and Demidov is 2nd in both. For floor Lev is probably near 3, and Parekh is probably near 3 for ceiling. I’d honestly trust the ANA scouting staff either way. My worst case is that we end up 5th and they’re all off the board. As long as we’re top 4 I’m cool with it, and would prefer top 3 to at least get a chance to see who our scouting staff prefers most
My ‘in the realm of possibility’ dream scenario is Demidov and then finding a way to move up for Yakemchuk. I’m vibing on that more than the alternative of Lev/Parekh + MBN
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 3:41 p.m.
Thread:
Offseason Attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>LosPatos
I can't <strong>wait</strong> for Tuesday night.
It's too bad that the only team with an "extra" first in the top half is San Jose, because I don't see them making any kind of deal with us.
The worst scenario, of course, is that Edmonton gets to the Conference finals (or further) and our second pick slides to #29 or later. Then we're looking at Chicago's pick from the Lightning at #20 to move up.</div></div>
Same!
I’ve been fully rooting for the Kings, but knew it was pretty hopeless the moment we beat VGK and LAK topped CHI to close out the season for another EDM/LAK matchup
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 3:26 p.m.
Thread:
What I would do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Ottawa might, Anaheim wouldn't.</div></div>
Regardless, I just don’t get the point. young LHC for young LHC for two teams in a very similar situation. Just seems like you’re making a trade to make a trade
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 3:22 p.m.
Thread:
Offseason Attempt
LosPatos <a href="/users/GiggywithGibby" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@GiggywithGibby</a> <a href="/users/OldNYIfan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@OldNYIfan</a> <a href="/users/GeneralLandro" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@GeneralLandro</a>
I feel like I’ve been our most firm fan on Levshunov all year. I have to admit, after watching some film the last couple days, I’m leaning Demidov kinda hard in a tier of his own behind Celebrini. He just feels like a certainty to be a star in the NHL. Also, think about a Gauthier, Leo, Demidov line 🤯 🤤
And to be honest, I’m somewhat torn between the high floor of Lev and the ceiling of Parekh in a tier after that. I’m really okay with any of these 4 guys at this point, but Demidov a notch higher than the RDs.
I know you guys are all hot on trading up for MBN, and after his playoff performance I’m more bought in. But tbh I’m super hot on Helenius. If there was a path to jump to like 11 with BUF (especially if we take a Dman early) I’d be keen
If not, totally like the 16OA position for Yakemchuk or MBN
If we keep our pick, my fingers are crossed for Hage rn, but far less conviction there and I feel like there’s a huge range on where he could go
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:26 p.m.
Thread:
Canadiens 24-25
Ducks counter with the EDM 1st and Lacombe for Caufield 🗑️
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:25 p.m.
Thread:
Trade for Draisatl
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>I think the basic pieces are there for Anaheim, just a matter of fine tuning the trade, but Foerster would absolutely be required.</div></div>
And imo all dependent on if they fell into drafting a LHC l. If not I see no reason to entertain a Zegras trade at all
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 11:55 p.m.
Thread:
Next
Of course we needed yet another regurgitated Zegras to MTL trade that no Ducks fan will give a hint of positivity for 🥱 🤦♂️
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com