SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

K_Hab

Member Since
Jul. 7, 2019
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
117
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 11:11 a.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>ah. okay. I see the problem here.
Group one, literally means that you are off your ELC. Countless resources can tell you this, but I don't think you need to go there. It is called a group 1 RFA. RFA stands for restricted free agent. There are two big examples of that this year, Boeser, and McAvoy. Both are acknowledged by all the media guys as exactly what they are, group one restricted free agents.

If group 1 RFA meant that you were still on your entry level deal, why would it be called group 1 rfa? why would it be called anything? Why wouldn't it just be called the players entry level deal?</div></div>

I've got the CBA right in front of me:

Subject to subsection (c) below, the period covered by the SPC for every Rookie,
and the number of years that such Player will be in the Entry Level System and subject to the
compensation limits set out in this Article, shall be as indicated on the chart immediately below,
and during such period, the Player shall be deemed to be a "Group 1 Player":
First SPC Signing Age
Period Covered by First SPC
and Years in the Entry Level System
and Subject to Compensation Limits
18-21 3 years
22-23 2 years
24 1 year
25 and older No required number of years, not in the Entry Level
System and not subject to limits on compensation
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 11:01 a.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>K. But he's still a group 1. That's literally why he's group 1. Because he was 19 when he signed, he didn't have a year tacked on his entry deal, which is why he's a group 1. Everyone acknowledges this except a couple bad writers that don't know what they're talking about.

Evolving Wild (trash guesswork), has him at a .2% chance of signing a 1 year deal. A lot of group 1 RFAs sign 1 year deals. They have him at 6 years and 7 million. That doesn't say anything about a 2 year deal. A 2 year deal is a totally different world of contract negotiations.</div></div>

Group 1 "Literally" mean's you're still on your ELC...McAvoy is not, he is now a group 2 RFA...Where are these plethora of people who acknowledge BS? even CapFriendly doesn't as they have him as RFA coming off his ELC...Also for Evolving Wild...try scrolling over to the right a bit and see what they project salary wise for each year term.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 11, 2019 at 10:33 a.m.
Thread: Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>well, because he is still group 1. Have to play ten regular season games for the season to count towards RFA rights chief. Group 1. Is this where I'm supposed to say, "LOL?"

Also evolving wild isn't that accurate. I think they had Nylander at like 4.8 million. whoops. They had Karlsson at what? 9.5ish? nope. Duchene at under 7. They had williams signing a 3 year deal with a 9% chance of him signing for 8 years.</div></div>

"In the event that an 18 year old or 19 year old Player signs an SPC with a
Club but does not play at least ten (10) NHL Games in the first season
under that SPC, the term of his SPC and his number of years in the Entry
Level System shall be extended for a period of one (1) year, except that
this automatic extension will not apply to a Player who is 19 according to
Section 9.2 by virtue of turning 20 between September 16 and December
31 in the year in which he first signs an SPC. Unless a Player and Club
expressly agree to the contrary, in the event a Player's SPC is extended an
additional year in accordance with this subsection, all terms of the SPC,
with the exception of Signing Bonuses, but including Paragraph 1 Salary,
games played bonuses and Exhibit 5 bonuses, shall be extended; provided,
however, that the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary shall be extended in all
circumstances.

He was 19 so exempt and he has a December Birthday
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 8, 2019 at 7:33 p.m.
Thread: Another Drouin Attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div>Drouin is a complete player who couldnt be trusted to play Top 6 minutes during the final playoff push for the Habs bc hes weak defensively....right thats a complete player. Just rock solid who does it all, oh right he is the opposite. You compare Drouin to top end elite offensive players who may score well beyond Drouin and are better defensively than drouin as well....Marner is 10 times the more complete player, Marner even kills penalite, whens the lat time Drouin has been asked to do that?

Oh right Drouins issue was he was just too strong, thats why he disappeared for the last 23 games of the season...do you realize that players lose weight during the season hahah, Drouin bulkd up and he was just too big . That might be the funniest excuse I have ever heard on this site</div></div>

Lol his issue was stamina is too far fetched for you...ok there, case in point Kessel. “Players lose weight during the season” ...Einstein here...what i’m Saying is he trained for a different purpose, you know, like athletes do sometimes ( or do you not know sports) a soccer player is not going to train like a football player...a linebacker is not going to train like a quarterback....and...wait for it....a center is not going to train like a winger...BINGO. Drouin’s offense fell off and that was why he was relegated to 3rd line minutes....The defence portion was irrelevant because the coach was trying to get his offense back going. It was a poor decision because KK was losing steam in his first full season as well...he should have been paired with Domi and Shaw.