SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

KreiderToBuchnevich

The KZB
Member Since
Jul. 17, 2016
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
2nd Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
Forum Posts
89
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 29, 2016 at 2:27 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 18, 2016 at 9:57 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 16, 2016 at 10:20 a.m.
Thread: McDonagh Burns
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nashless</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KreiderToBuchnevich</b></div><div><i>Marleau is at the end of his career. This only weakens our offense. McDonagh is about equal to Burns and 4 years younger. And why even bother with Donskoi? Our forward depth right now is incredible, and there is no reason to trade for him. All around terrible trade for the Rangers.

We look at the player-for-player comparisons and you get:

Nash (32) for Marleau (37)
McDonagh (27) for Burns (31)

and there is just no point in getting Donskoi and giving up Lindberg. It accomplishes nothing.</i></div></div> Have you ever seen Donskoi or Burns play, like last years playoffs? Lindberg will never be in our top 12 and Nash has to go this year, hopefully Before the POs.</i></div></div>

Why? Nash is having a fine season so far. No reason to trade him for someone close to retirement. I did watch them last year during the playoffs, but if getting rid of McDonagh is what it takes to exchange Lindberg for Donskoi, it just isn't worth it.

And even if you were right about any of what you said (which you mostly aren't), Marleau has a NMC, and Burns, McDonagh, and Nash all have Modified-NTCs. This trade is completely unfeasible. The only part that could be done is the Lindberg for Donskoi part, of which would never get accepted by the SJS.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 27, 2016 at 1:28 a.m.