SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

SamMcI0036

Member Since
Dec. 10, 2017
Favourite Team
Ottawa Senators
Forum Posts
104
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 3, 2018 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread: What i think arizona should do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMTD</b></div><div>I see a CF GM from another team actually sees the same value in Okposo that I do.
I assure you Botterill will be sending Okposo the Arizona if Kyle waives his no trade contract. I think because Moulson was on the Sabre roster was one of the reasons he signed with Buffalo, but since he is gone now, so he may very well waive it. IMO, Sabres would have to retain some salary ($1,500,000) is a good amount, and either a pick (maybe a 3rd) or a prospect (Guhle may be too much) for this to be a completely fair trade.
Five stars for this trade alone.

All of the other trades look even except the one with CBJ. I think it would take more to pry Panarin out of Ohio.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>If you want Panarin you’ll need to add. Like a lot.... like Keller and Domi and your 2018 first.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyPercent</b></div><div>Keller AND Domi is way too much for Panarin. Let alone a top 10 pick.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>Lol. It’s not.... if you want to pry out the guy who has the most points in a single season in team history..... okay. Maybe the top 10 pick is too much. But Domi and Keller for an established first line nhl player. Domi has been okay... and Keller was good for a month then poof he was gone.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>We_Want_The_Cup</b></div><div>Okposo deal is off because he's overpaid for a 45pt player that's really good for powerplays but slightly drags down his team when 5-on-5 (See: 5-on-5 CorsiForRel% -1.7 and FenwickRel% -3.5).
I think he can be acquired for a high 2nd round pick without salary retention. If ARI wants BUF to retain salary, he could alternatively be acquired for a low 1st round pick.

Panarin is a top-10 NHL star in his prime. Thankfully for you, he only has 1 year left till UFA. Murphy is a C+/B- prospect with limited foreseeable NHL future (unless he surprises us). The 1st rounder is a good start (though being in 2020 is unrealistically far). I think the conversation starts with any comparable NHL elite player, like OEL or Keller, and continues with Arizona's #5 selection this year. CBJ must not be in any hurry whatsoever to trade Panarin away, so you're not in a position of power. You have to pay more.

Hope you had fun!</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SirCharles</b></div><div>Riley Nash gets 3 mil+.
Domi gets 4 ish give or take.
Why on gods green earth would Carolina give up a 3rd/5th for a 4th line player and a terrible contract?
Okposo don't get a first, his contract can be described as "albatross": a source of worry or distress.
unless they retain like 2 million, then maybe someone takes a chance. 5 years left on a contract with a player over 30 with declining production. yikes.
Chicago trade maybe can be tweaked but i'm thinking to save face, Saad is going to be given every chance to succeed next year because of what they paid for him. so no.
Columbus trade is straight up not enough value.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>We have no reason to trade Panarin away unless we're getting a replacement scoring superstar who will be able to play <strong>as</strong> as a scoring superstar <strong>next year</strong>. Your package does not contain such an asset; therefore it is insufficient.</div></div>

Ok, like I said in the description I am not the best at making trades but, I think I made it better now
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4, 2018 at 1:11 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4, 2018 at 1:10 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 24, 2018 at 9:05 a.m.
Thread: Realistic?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Batherson</b></div><div>Wideman, at least to me was playing very well before he got injured, offensively and defensively, I know this isn’t the best thing to look at but he was on pace for 41 points this year, maybe it’s not the best thing to give him a large upgrade after an injury but I don’t think the value is out of the window.

Claesson has also been fine this year and I’d much rather him over Ceci, Borowiecki and Harpur, Ceci is just making more mainly because it seems the management has more faith in him. Maybe $500K-$750K off the Claesson deal would be better but still I don’t believe the value is out the window.</div></div>

Wideman makes sense but, I don't think you need to sign claesson for that much money and I rather borowiecki over claesson