Stevo989898

Member Since

Dec. 16, 2021

Favourite Team

Edmonton Oilers

Forum Posts

231

Posts per Day

0.3

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 2:35 a.m.

Thread: Campbell for Anderson

The difference between these two cap dumps is not 2 firsts.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 2:20 a.m.

Thread: Campbell for Anderson

two firsts to dump campbell is a bit rash, especially with anderson contract coming back

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 2:18 a.m.

Thread: Campbell for Anderson

That's a bit of an overpayment to dump Campbell, even if Anderson wasn't going back the other way.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 2:03 a.m.

Thread: Campbell for Anderson

Instead of Anderson's cap hit of $4.6 million* for three seasons, and slightly smaller compensation, I think Edmonton is better off biting the bullet for six more months and then buying Campbell out at a cost of $10.5 million spread out over 6 seasons, the cap hit never exceeding $2.6 million, and keeping the two firsts. RW is not a major weakness for the Oilers.

Late edit: original formulation had $900,000 retention; half a million makes this idea even worse for Edmonton

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1 at 5:09 p.m.

Thread: seems fair ish

Sorry to say this again, but just thinking out loud... Our prospect pool is better than yours which is saying very little LOL. Remove Kane, because we simply don't need another injury-prone forward on a team that usually leads the league in man-games-lost lol. Here's the counter...

TO EDM: Jake Guentzel ($2M retained) and Pierre-Olivier Joseph
TO PIT: 2025 (not 24) 1st, 2024 2nd, 2025 2nd and Brett Kulak

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1 at 12:58 p.m.

Thread: Finishing touches ALL IN

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Beargold</b></div><div>I don't know, I think they're pretty star-studded and have that depth. They've been at the top of the standings all year and have just added great centre depth without losing a significant roster piece. I think they stand a pretty good shot, although I am biased.</div></div>

Kuzmenko is significant... I think they are 2-4-1 without Kuzy in the lineup

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30 at 2:36 p.m.

Thread: I wonder Would teams do this Helps them for other moves themselves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stevo989898</b></div><div>We will rock with CP, he is playing well.</div></div>

And very possible and I agree. I can the Oilers making a small depth move for a forward with size only. Mainly because they have been playing extremely well and looking unbeatable.
During the win streak they did not play a single top 5 team if I remember correctly making the streak a little easier.
If Oilers keep up their winning ways of around .600 or better hockey til the deadline, the best move for them is probably a small depth move and they forgo any idea to clear Kulak. Better to keep chemistry then change when all is well.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30 at 11:11 a.m.

Thread: Savard

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fran615</b></div><div>Glad that both sides of that trade proposal are in agreement.
Habs also would decline, and prefer Savard 100 times out of 100.
I guess this trade is refused by both teams.

If there's no upgrade on both sides, better keep the player who is liked in the team, shows leadership, knows the system, etc.

Bourgault is speeding towards bust territory as well, like Lavoie 2.0.

I am a Habs fan but wish the Oilers to win the Cup. Love that team!

Cheers guys.</div></div>

Tbh, I think Lavoie will be an NHL player. His shot is NHL caliber and has redefined his game a bit in the AHL. I can see him being a middle 6 forward, given the opportunity. I was never a fan of Bourgoult and hated that we drafted him.
Also, I see some Habs fan like Savard and some don't. I don't watch the Habs, but just stats wise, he's -47 thus far in his career as a Hab and has horrible analytics. He's also 33. I know he was fairly underrated a few season ago, but it seems like his best days are well past him.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30 at 10:40 a.m.

Thread: Savard

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SupremeBone</b></div><div>I don't trust Savard to be an upgrade on Ceci and the difference in cap isn't worth giving up Bourgault for.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fail4Nail</b></div><div>That is a horrible overpayment for Savard. Ceci is a better player rn. Savard is not an upgrade to him.</div></div>

Glad that both sides of that trade proposal are in agreement.
Habs also would decline, and prefer Savard 100 times out of 100.
I guess this trade is refused by both teams.

If there's no upgrade on both sides, better keep the player who is liked in the team, shows leadership, knows the system, etc.

Bourgault is speeding towards bust territory as well, like Lavoie 2.0.

I am a Habs fan but wish the Oilers to win the Cup. Love that team!

Cheers guys.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30 at 10:53 a.m.

Thread: All in

Caps accept. I don’t think you’ll be getting much love from oilers fans though

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 25 at 9:53 a.m.

Thread: Allen finally Traded

The Oilers have figured out their goaltending and now have time to figure out what to do with Campbell. This deal, although fair for getting out from under Campbells contract, doesn't make sense right now.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 25 at 10:06 a.m.

Thread: MTL TDL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stevo989898</b></div><div>Oil accept</div></div>

Nah. I don't think they want to get slower down the middle. Monohan looks good by counting numbers but he's getting a lot of PP time, which wouldn't translate to Edmonton. Also, I happen to think very highly of Akey.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 25 at 7:33 a.m.

Thread: Selling

Edmonton isn't spending a 1st on Novak, a pending UFA who would be their 4C.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22 at 2:47 p.m.

Thread: What Else

I think this is the type of offer Chicago might accept.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 19 at 12:32 a.m.

Thread: trade deadline

Keep broberg. Hawks accept.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 11:50 p.m.

Thread: trade deadline

You wouldn't need to add Broberg to Chicago, the 2nd is enough

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 6:24 p.m.

Thread: Trade deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stevo989898</b></div><div>He does, he just gets to say no to certain teams....you think he signed with the CAPS thinking they would suck?</div></div>

He gets to say no to any movement at all. It's a full NMC, he can't be traded or waived.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 5:19 p.m.

Thread: Step One Deadline Deals

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Oilers_29</b></div><div>EDM easily says no if we wanted chychrun we would have got him last year we aren’t gonna overpay and pay more than what the sens got him for</div></div>

I'd do the trade if they changed the first to 2025, and took out one of broberg and bourgoult.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 3:46 p.m.

Thread: How much will DeBrusk get

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stevo989898</b></div><div>I'd rather keep Ceci and have a solid D core... no way Kulak goes to the press box, he's valuable.</div></div>

Don't worry about the other stuff, this ACGM was just to gauge Debrusks Value

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 3:26 p.m.

Thread: Trade deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NARC311</b></div><div>It wouldn’t surprise me if he just sticks it out and aims to play playoff hockey next year, after what he’s gone through</div></div>

I could see this. Depends on how’s he’s performing. If he is feeling good and ready I think he waives. If he still needs time to really get back to old self then he stays

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 1:35 p.m.

Thread: goalie

Please stop. No more Merzlikins trades.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 1:18 p.m.

Thread: Deadline

Im sure the Flyers would be willing to retain salary on Walker as well.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 1:35 p.m.

Thread: Deadline

Please stop. No more Merzlikins trades.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 12:37 p.m.

Thread: CBJ continues the retool

EDM will just buyout Campbell in the offseason. Find another team for Merzlikins.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 10:14 a.m.

Thread: Taking back a familar face

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stevo989898</b></div><div>I understand the point and agree he probably would have got 6 x 8 and been a steal at that contract.

I am just stating that right now for all the Nurse haters, he's still a top pairing defenseman logging some tough minutes with a really good 3rd pairing partner.</div></div>

Yes, exactly!
I like Nurse too, don't get me wrong. I also like Ceci, but he's much better suited as a 2nd pair dman. Hopefully we get another RH dman to play with Nurse.

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Stevo989898

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day