SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TxRollerhawk

Boom shaka
Member Since
Jun. 24, 2019
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
484
Posts per Day
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29, 2023 at 5:50 p.m.
Thread: FA class
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Onlyfairtrades1</b></div><div>Here is what you said word for word......."CHI could just offer sheet Laf at $4.2M and only give up their 2024 2nd round pick, if ya'll like that better. Good luck matching, too, it's certainly doable, but not without it's sacrifices". Not a childish treat you say? Take our crappy trade offer or else....like an 8 year old. You going to take your ball and go home too? Grow up.</div></div>

lol. What about that isn't hypothetical and isn't exactly what I just laid out to you multiple times? I'm not the one reading way too far into things and getting offended over nothing. I honestly don't even care, at this point I'm just having fun keeping this going so I can watch you freak out and grasp at straws. But, would you maybe just take a step back for a second and consider the possibility that you read that with the entirely wrong tone in your head...
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29, 2023 at 5:36 p.m.
Thread: FA class
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Onlyfairtrades1</b></div><div>37 offer sheets in 37 years in the NHL and only a couple have been successful, so yeah, I think Drury will sleep ok tonight. And it is very childish to make the treat after a teams fans turn down a ridicules trade offer for one of their young players....its what a spoiled 8 year old boy would do.</div></div>

Again, it wasn't a threat, it was just something to consider that is a completely valid and realistic possibility under the rules laid out in the NHL's Collective Bargaining Agreement. What was offered in that proposal is significantly better than what the Rangers would get with a $4.2M offer sheet, and a $4.2M offer sheet would be difficult for the Rangers to match without significant repercussions elsewhere on their roster. It was a hypothetical situation. So, I'm not even saying that anyone would ACTUALLY do it, but it has to be a consideration. You're the one who sounds like a child getting all huffy and defensive over something that is completely realistic, legal, and based in reality, instead of just accepting the reality of the situation and hoping it doesn't happen.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 23, 2022 at 12:27 p.m.