SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

huntsy95

Member Since
Jan. 31, 2023
Favourite Team
Ottawa Senators
2nd Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
55
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 15 at 2:51 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 20, 2023 at 11:31 a.m.
Thread: TKTK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>You're not wrong but I don't know why you're talking about this here. Your proposed deal is not a cap saving trade, it's a hockey trade


Yes but you can get rid of the full cap if the player has an AAV under 1.15

https://montrealhockeynow.com/2023/07/24/montreal-canadiens-burried-ahl-salary-could-impact-habs-waivers-joel-armia-christian-dvorak-mike-hoffman/

<em>The amount of salary cap relief provided by assigning a player to the AHL is the league minimum plus the buried threshold.

In 2023-24, the NHL league minimum salary will be $775,000 (CBA (11.12.a) and the buried threshold will be $375,000, which means teams can bury up to $1.15 million in the AHL.</em></div></div>

Interesting - thanks for sharing.

What are your thoughts on the best course of action regarding the Pinto situation? The main names being thrown out there are Branny, Jo and Kubalik and I don't think there are any ideal outcomes but I personally wouldn't mind the notion of trading Forsberg and running Korpisalo/Soogard. Just not sure what type of value Forsberg holds around the league based on the injury concern. Let me know which takes you agree or disagree with most below...

Joseph: The obvious answer based on his cap + where he would slot in the lineup. Would be the worst trade value-wise as you would have to give a sweetener. I do still think he has upside as a player and can't get any worse than he was last year so I think he could be due for a bounce-back year. Do you trust Greig enough to play full-time on the 3rd line and have Joseph on the fourth? If he is still here he would likely be on the fourth line and I think that spot can be filled with one of Sokolov/Jarventie/Smejkal without much of a drop-off.

Brannstrom: Like the player but with our top 4 being set for the next few years he will always be on the bottom pair and I think Kleven a great fit there anyway so wouldn't mind losing him. You could also get some value in return on a trade as opposed to Jo.

Kubalik: I would like to keep him as I think he could put up 20+ playing with Pinto and Greig on the third.

Overall I think Dorion has to bite the bullet and trade Joseph with a sweetener. This team is built to win right now so losing a draft pick should not be a major blocker.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 19, 2023 at 5:28 p.m.
Thread: TKTK
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 15, 2023 at 1:05 p.m.
Thread: who says no
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 15, 2023 at 12:33 p.m.
Thread: who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AnonymousSensFan</b></div><div>I agree with the poster above that Arizona says no. Value is definitely in their favor. Joseph and Kelly are dumps. The second and Brannstrom might be enough to cover the offloading, but not the players coming back.

I'm also not sure what you're trying to accomplish for the Sens? What's the purpose of trading Brannstrom for Durzi? Durzi is ok, but not really needed. In your above lineup, Sens are carrying 8D, which is a bit excessive. If Kleven is ready, you trade Branny and just use the 1M in cap space savings for Pinto. Or JBD if Sens have given up on him, but no real cap savings there.

Kelly has negative value. Didn't have a good year. If Sens are done with him, better off just to waive him than have to pay to dump him. If he clears, send him to Belleville. No cap hit and you can walk away after this year.

Then there's also Arizona itself. They made it clear when they traded Chychrun that they didn't want to take money back. So, I'd imagine ownership may have lost its appetite to be a trade partner for bad contracts, meaning that even with a proper amount of draft pick compensation, they probably refuse to take on Joseph's contract.</div></div>

The way I look at it in terms of trade value is Branny/Durzi basically cancel out (Branny might have slightly more trade value). Joseph and Kelly both have negative value so stack that negative value on the 2nd round pick and call it a 5th round pick value-wise - so you're basically getting Mcbain for a 5th (stack on some of Brannys excess value over Durzi too).

As for team fit, Ottawa upgrades their fourth line by replacing Kelly with Mcbain. The bottom pair for Ottawa is now Kleven-Durzi instead of Branny-Hamonic, which I kind of like better. Arizona has a lot of guys ready to take the next step so they can afford to lose a guy like Mcbain. They get to take a flyer on Joseph potentially being a useful player and they have tons of cap space for him. Overall sens get better today and Arizona still gets to have a promising young D plus another high pick.

Perhaps you exchange Kelly for JBD to make it a little more even.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 10, 2023 at 1:19 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 25, 2023 at 2:46 p.m.