DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
iAce
Member Since
May 24, 2021
Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
2nd Favourite Team
Vegas Golden Knights
Forum Posts
173
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 4:00 p.m.
Thread:
Last Year of Buyout Hell
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>iAce</b></div><div>Ok Toronto fans are going to chew this deal up and spit it out. Here's the issue that fans need to realize. Knies was on the 1st line for part of the season with Matthews and only put up 36 points. Based on value and what he can be, Knies couldn't even fetch Rossi anymore without Toronto adding to that deal. I don't mind the trade above and giving a bit more to pry a younger asset from them. I would see if any veteran would be willing to waive the NMC and us retain half on a deal. So maybe a Foligno/Hartman added with us keeping half their contract. But I don't think this trade is as far off as fans will say it is. The Faber for Knies and a 1st is wild. The 25th overall pick and Knies doesn't equal Faber.
Also, every year that goes by without them going for it means they are wasting the roster away. I look at the Penguins as the team that got the most out of their superstars. I think the Leafs need to take the same approach. I think their D-core is pretty bad. Maybe a Spurgeon could help them on the right side. I think getting Knies would be huge for us tho, I think GusBus/Spurgeon could be on the move this summer. We need to get a younger and bigger right handed d-man in there.</div></div>
You do know Knies put up 35 points playing only an avg of 13 minutes a night on the bottom 6. He's going to be a 50+ point player when he gets his minutes
Knies is an untouchable for Toronto
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 1:41 p.m.
Thread:
Last Year of Buyout Hell
You forgot to include Spurgeon
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 5 at 10:51 p.m.
Thread:
The Most Not Realistic Offseason
Completely unhinged
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 6 at 3:33 p.m.
Thread:
The Most Not Realistic Offseason
First and last trade are terrible for the Wild. Middle two would benefit the Wild but the other teams would probably not go for it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 5 at 10:43 p.m.
Thread:
The Most Not Realistic Offseason
Canes pass. Burns can teach Morrow the keys to his offensive game instead.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 21 at 6:03 p.m.
Thread:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>iAce</b></div><div>Thank you for the feedback. I'll change that moving forward. I'm guessing you are referring to the Spurgeon deal? Or what deal were you referring to? I didn't trade UFA's. Each player has term left on their deal.</div></div>
No, I was referring to Zucc.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 21 at 5:49 p.m.
Thread:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>iAce</b></div><div>Thats fair, I think he may be the most untouchable piece on our roster. I have a question for you and other fans. What is your window, or how long until this roster actually gets really good? For example, because the Wild are minus $15 mill in cap space, our window couldn't begin for another 2 years. Thats why I would move a guy like Zucc. I see the Sharks window being 3-5 years away, maybe a bit longer. Because of that, I don't think Faber would help a ton for the next 3 years. If you were to trade back this year and get a potential 1-2c and is young, with 2 first round picks. In 3-5 years Rossi is still 25-27 and is in his prime. You get 2 first rounders on top of it to get other talented pieces. I think you are right though, my brain just goes to what that pick will do for you guys. Pick Celebrini, let him sit in the NCAA another year, hopefully start building a roster out for protect him. He isn't Bedard where he was a lock to be a star. If he doesn't pan out to be that guy, you are even further back from being competitive. And if you can't surround him with talent he doesn't develop properly. Just my thoughts and rants. But ultimately that pick doesn't move and you guys get an exciting piece for the future!</div></div>
It simply comes down to if the Sharks are giving up a potential elite 1C at the start of his career then they need an elite young player at a premium position coming back in return. Rossi is good but he’s probably not going to be an elite 1C. Those picks you included will get you good prospects, but again the likelihood of them turning into truly elite players is low.
The player that fits the bill is Faber. He’s only 21, so even though the Sharks are a few years away from contention he’s still young enough to be in his prime on the next good Sharks team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 20 at 10:41 p.m.
Thread:
Version 2
Leafs keep the good cost efficient Knies, and have 4.5m in cap for a UFA RHD instead of one 4.5m retained Spurgeon.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 20 at 11:33 p.m.
Thread:
Version 2
For starters, you need to use a 24-25 template. The 23-24 template no longer applies as the trade deadline has passed.
Just as important, nobody is giving you top prospects already contributing in the NHL for old,expensive UFAs. That's just pure fantasy.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 20 at 10:51 p.m.
Thread:
Version 2
That doesn’t get you Schneider
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 20 at 11:40 p.m.
Thread:
Version 2
I just don’t see San Jose moving their possible 1st ever 1st overall, especially when the pick would be a kid who was a previous Jr shark and he’s the consensus top player in the draft
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 21 at 8:57 a.m.
Thread:
Version 2
These are solid. Zuccarello is an upgrade the rangers need at forward and the value is maybe slightly skewed to Minny there.
Spurgeon is the guy the leafs keep thinking they’re trading for when they’re sending mid rounders for Lynushkin types. No way they do something that smart
The sharks move is probably the only one that’s off, and that’s only because no one really knows what the value of 1OA is in a trade anymore. That said, it’s closer than Josh Anderson for 1OA that we’re seeing here lmao
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 21 at 12:30 a.m.
Thread:
Version 2
Sharks need a #1 C after trading Hertl so as reasonable as this deal is I think we have to say no.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 21 at 11:37 a.m.
Thread:
Version 2
Sharks would want Faber if they’re giving up the Celebrini pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 17 at 7:48 p.m.
Thread:
Sell then Buy
LMAOOOOO You did not just say Lilijgren would shelter Faber because he's struggling. Faber is already a wayyyyyy better player than Lilijgren. He would be sheltering Lilijgren.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 17 at 6:23 p.m.
Thread:
Sell then Buy
Holy hell, did you actually just say that <strong>Lily</strong> could shelter a "struggling" Faber???
:tearsofjoy
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 17 at 4:49 p.m.
Thread:
Sell then Buy
These are all just a bunch of Homer Trades
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12 at 12:50 p.m.
Thread:
Jarvy 2C
Why is a bottom-10 MN team trading away a cheaper D-man with term for a rental? And adding a high 2nd on top of it?
Edit - i'm sorry, realized this is for UFA signing rights, so it's even worse.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 6 at 10:47 a.m.
Thread:
Wild Idea
Wild overpay on the Minnesota deal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 6 at 2:42 p.m.
Thread:
Sorry Not Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Prime_Jimbo</b></div><div>Man, I gotta say that's tough. Maybe swap a late for a future first from Ottawa vs Edmonton or Boston.
But, fair enough on the need for good player in return instead of so many futures. Figured a boat load of futures might be ideal for Minnesota coming off the buyouts.</div></div>
Minnesota's pretty much through the buyouts at this point. The time for futures was a couple years ago. Now the only way they trade Kaprizov is if he decides he won't re-sign. Minnesota needs young, NHL ready players to grow with the rest of the core- Boldy, Rossi, Faber, Yurov, Wallstedt, etc.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 4 at 9:46 p.m.
Thread:
big moves
Minny isn’t trading their Calder candidate D man for a pile of stuff
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 4:19 a.m.
Thread:
Super Unrealistic but would be fun
Minnesota would need more value than that to give up a year + of Middleton on a cheap contract. A rental, an underwhelming prospect, and 2 late round picks don't get it done. When you add Maroon into the mix, it's even worse. While he won't get a ton, we could possibly get the 4th and 7th for him alone from someone near the deadline.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 1:06 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with the enemy
Eriksson Ek isn't available. But for the sake of argument, a few points to make:
1) You are offering a 1st in the late 20s, an injury-prone young D yet to play a full season, and a presumably late 1st in 2026, so 2,5 years from now. There's some value but nothing that makes the Wild jump out of joy, no surefire asset. Eriksson Ek is a premium defensive 2C with an extremely team-friendly deal. You have to give something surefire to acquire him.
2) We are trading him to a divisional rival here. That means COL probably needs to pay a bit extra. Also, if we made JEEK available, there'd be a bidding war for the ages driving the price up even more.
So, to sum it up, this purely hypothetical offer is not enough for the WIld to trade their MVP to a rival.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 18 at 1:54 p.m.
Thread:
lets get it done
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mediumyeet</b></div><div>My bad, disregard this trade then. I didn't realize they also extended him with an NMC. Man the wild could have really reset this deadline if they didn't extend Zucc, Foligno, and Hartman with NMC's before the season. Those should be job costing moves for Guerin IMO.</div></div>
They should be, but Kaprizov will walk for nothing before he actually loses his job
For the record, Hartman getting extended isn't an issue, it's the other two
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 17 at 7:55 p.m.
Thread:
protect the lead
Assuming Toronto will be a top team and have 1sts in the high 20s for the next 3-5 years, I wouldn’t trade Toronto Ek for 3 1st rounders. A bird in the hand…
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com