SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

johnston3504

Member Since
May 6, 2019
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
2nd Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
439
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 19, 2020 at 10:15 a.m.
Thread: no more changes
He shouldn't get much more than what he is making currently, only played 39 games and yes he had 23 pts so makes him around a 48 pt / 82 games, so with this in mind here is what is applicable

What Evidence Can Be Presented
The evidence that can be used in arbitration cases includes:

The player's "overall performance" including statistics in all previous seasons - overall it was an ok performance

Injuries, illnesses, and the number of games played - injured only plaied half the season so that is against him

The player's length of service with the team and in the NHL - basically none

The player's "overall contribution" to the team's success or failure - this is something that will help him some as the team did better when he was healthy but honestly how much better.

The player's "special qualities of leadership or public appeal" - this would be a zero

The performance and salary of any player believed to be comparable to the player in the dispute - now this one you are comparing kappy and jonsson they had a good deal but it was based on 4 years and playing full seasons so if he wants that kind of money he will need to sign for a 4 year deal, i assume they want to do a 1 or 2 year deal so i would say under or at 1 million, his qualifying offer would only be at 1.07 mill max from what i understand as its a max of 120% of his base salary which is 832,500.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 5, 2020 at 7:13 a.m.