jpozz1996

anonymous96

Member Since

Mar. 14, 2018

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

2nd Favourite Team

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.0

Forum: Expansion DraftFeb. 24, 2021 at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: Seattle kraken

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tntpod</b></div><div>its ok overall but why Ryan Kesler?! 🤔</div></div>

Ferland, Kesler, Boychuck all LTIR picks. With the pandemic some of these tams might look to shed contracts to a team like Vegas, maybe give up another middle asset (not to the extent Vegas got) as Seattle could be a cap floor team and able to afford 3-4 guys on LTIR.

Forum: Expansion DraftFeb. 24, 2021 at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: Seattle kraken

Ferland, Kesler, Boychuck all LTIR picks. With the pandemic some of these tams might look to shed contracts to a team like Vegas, maybe give up another middle asset (not to the extent Vegas got) as Seattle could be a cap floor team and able to afford 3-4 guys on LTIR.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 22, 2019 at 7:05 p.m.

Thread: lets get going bois

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EmilFo</b></div><div>Good try, but I don´t think a rebuilding team like Ottawa is giving up picks for trashplayer and an old player... Pearson is tradeable, having small value .. I don´t think Devils want to loose a 2nd rounder for Sutter. Maybe Schnieder + 2 nd rounder for Sutter+ 3rd rounder.. LOL.</div></div>

Markstrom for Russell is a LOL

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 17, 2019 at 7:08 p.m.

Thread: Offseason

Tanev + Spooner = 2nd round // is way more useful for both teams

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 12, 2019 at 6:59 p.m.

Thread: Gilly come back

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sedin33</b></div><div>Hutton is not a contract dump. In fact, he's better than Myers now. Signing Myers for that contract will handcuff the team.

I agree with your pov re asset management. We disagree with how to do that.</div></div>

Hutton = more contract numbers than contract dump. Now if the Canucks move on from Edler, then yes resign Hutton I agree. However I don't see the point in bringing back Edler and Hutton, cause then you're going to lose a guy like Sautner or Brisebois through waivers unless you look to move one of those guys.

By trading Hutton with Sutter, you're not getting as good as a return, however you are getting a former 1st round pick who could slide into a 4th line centreman role in a few years.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 12, 2019 at 4:19 p.m.

Thread: Gilly come back

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sedin33</b></div><div>I don't know that your team is better than the Canucks right now. You bleed value in your Hutton & Tanev trades. Signing Myers to that contract is classic Benning not Gilly.

I'd rather keep Tanev one more year and lose him for nothing than that trade + Meyers signing.</div></div>

The idea is that this team is 5 years into a Benning rebuild, and there is no way to make this team better for next year under the current circumstances. So I agree that this team is bad on paper, but on the outlook there is room to leave space for upcoming prospects. These trades are more about ridding of contracts than getting maximized value. Like I said, the issue isn't TDL and the Draft, Benning has done okay drafting, but come July 1st he signs outrageous contracts that just handcuff the team. Asset management Is now the issue, not developing a prospect pool.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 12, 2019 at 12:37 a.m.

Thread: fire Jim-john

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BlueSeeker</b></div><div>A 4th liner isnt meant to light up the lamp. Motte plays a grinder role. Boucher the kind of guy who scores a goal then lets in 2 goals due to absolute dumpster trash defense. You know that 2 is a bigger number than 1 right?</div></div>

Schaller, Motte, Beagle have a combined 82 years of age, 10 goals, 149 games and -23 (the analytics are even worse but I'm not gonna get into that)... do not try to tell me Boucher would worsen that cause

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 11, 2019 at 2:52 a.m.

Thread: fire Jim-john

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ExpiredmilkYT</b></div><div>Oof</div></div>

yubbuubybibiobiobiohubvnjuvy

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 11, 2019 at 2:50 a.m.

Thread: fire Jim-john

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BlueSeeker</b></div><div>One guy can actually play with NHL players(plays on the 4th line btw) and the other guy is an AHL superstar and COMPLETELY useless in the NHL(who would you rather have?)</div></div>

Probably the guy that actually has a chance at scoring. Charlie Hustle can't score goals.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 11, 2019 at 2:13 a.m.

Thread: fire Jim-john

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BlueSeeker</b></div><div>Motte is better than Boucher. Boucher can't skate like an NHL player.</div></div>

one guy has 30 goals in the AHL this year...the other guy is fifth WORST of forwards in the NHL in goals scored % and scoring chance differential (who would u rather have?)

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 10, 2019 at 7:12 p.m.

Thread: macewen baby lets go

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BlueSeeker</b></div><div>I am actually hoping Grandlund gets traded to another team for a mid pick(I made some ACGM doing this trade). As for Sutter I really hope he gets placed on waivers and claimed. The Canucks should have traded him to one of the California teams when they were interested in the offseason.</div></div>

I think neither will be with the team for next season, however I would assume granlund is easier to trade at TDL and Sutter in the summer.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 10, 2019 at 6:25 p.m.

Thread: macewen baby lets go

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BlueSeeker</b></div><div>Sutter also sucks. He just floats around the middle and plays like a pylon. He can't pass, can't skate and can't shoot. I really hope Gaudette is ready soon, because once he is then Sutter needs to be shipped out of town with retained salary or forever banished to the AHL like Gagner.</div></div>

Ya gaudette is definitely ready for the NHL but Sutter still have some value, I bet if he was placed on waivers a team would claim him, but making a trade will be difficult. I'd still take Sutter over granlund in the short term. Definitely DO NOT resign granlund.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 9, 2019 at 3:34 p.m.

Thread: just playing

I think you meant ... goldobin + pouliot + 3rd round + 3rd round // dzingel???

Forum: Mock-DraftJan. 31, 2019 at 2:30 p.m.

Thread: from seravelli

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sens65</b></div><div>why do you move pool-party up?</div></div>

It was reported that CBJ was also contemplating taking Puljarvi, and if so then Sergachev was EDM's guy. If Dubois was available at 5, Subban was going to VAN for 5th overall which MTL would have selected Dubois, as Dubois was #1 on MTL list. But the price to move up to #3 was much higher than the price to select at 5. Thats what this re-do was about.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 29, 2019 at 1:37 a.m.

Thread: thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Poehling</b></div><div>Chiarot over Niku</div></div>

I agree Chairot is hurt rn any ways, Niku goes to Manitoba once Byfuglien is off IR anyways

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 27, 2019 at 8:42 p.m.

Thread: who says no

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>Sutter is trash, And there's talk that Tallon wants to bring Gudbranson back to Florida. Doubt either Edmonton or Vancouver make this deal. So both clubs say No.</div></div>

well I bet less than 0.5% of all trades on CapFriendly have been actual NHL trades so in theory both clubs say no, I agree. Sutter isn't trash he's just on a bad team with the young players having a helluva season and TG getting the most outta his squad.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 27, 2019 at 8:40 p.m.

Thread: who says no

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonesryan</b></div><div>Edmonton says no easily. Lucic, Manning, Suter, & Gudbranson are all just cap dumps. Then you have Edmonton sending one of their best defensive prospects to Vancouver too? No.</div></div>

it's not just a cap dump, its also 2 more years than Sutter/guddy at a high cap hit. I know EDM wants more leadership and a larger locker room presence and Sutter is a local boy who can still play good puck as a bottom 6 centre, its just a thought I have had.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 27, 2019 at 8:37 p.m.

Thread: who says no

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>moli92</b></div><div>McDavid being a top 5 player in the league is a massive understatement</div></div>

obviously not a Canuck fan otherwise you would get the joke.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 4, 2018 at 10:29 p.m.

Thread: Way out there options

kesler gonna waive his NMC out of Anaheim to go to Boston .... better chance of Seattle winning the 2020 Stanley cup than that happening I'm sorry

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 3, 2018 at 11:10 p.m.

Thread: More Trades

I really do think the Baertschi-Maaa trade is a fair trade and something VAN would seriously entertain, the problem is Sven has a bad concussion right now and who knows if he'll be the same player going forward. Juolevi/Hughes/Maata on the left side in VAN would be a nice core left side moving forward.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 2, 2018 at 10:45 p.m.

Thread: all in cause well

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JelloPony</b></div><div>adding a 50-60 point player for a Kapanen (who has really cooled off btw and not worth much hype now) and a young guy who hasn't made his mark in the NHL yet, makes you weaker how?</div></div>

TOR will not be able to resign Kapanen for what he's going to want, Simmonds will be a veteran rental player that comes at the cost of Brown and Kapanen. I think the player trade-off is good value, picks would adjust whatever other value Which is why I agree with you. Why wouldn't you add a proven veteran for a playoff run, cause we all know that once Matthews and Marner sign monster contracts, its going to be kind of difficult and I think it's hard to argue that.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 15, 2018 at 3:39 p.m.

Thread: huge hypothetical

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>I wouldn't say that, take out Hyman and Goldobin and have Vancouver retain some salary, or maybe add Brown or something.</div></div>

Brown instead of Hyman could work thats fair. I don't think VAN retains Tanev salary, only because it seems like the extra year of Tanev would replace Hainsey's contract. And thats incentive for TOR to not overspend (i.e., Zaitsev)

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 15, 2018 at 3:27 p.m.

Thread: huge hypothetical

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>joshelkin</b></div><div>Aside from MDZ I don't think a single one of these trades would go through. Vancouver wins every one by a mile</div></div>

as an islanders fan you should know what it feels like to lose a franchise player for nothing

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 14, 2018 at 3:25 a.m.

Thread: if they picked 4th overall

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>moli92</b></div><div>Why does COL give away Kaut?</div></div>

oh ya oops

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 10, 2018 at 5:27 p.m.

Thread: Breadman

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sedin33</b></div><div>Why would a rebuilding Canucks trade their 1st round pick for a rental in Panarin? Also the draft is in Vancouver. And then you have Guddy as your top RHD?</div></div>

Look at Breadman part 2 before you rip into this (also a 2020 first round pick; I'm not that crazy). This would be at this trade deadline, part 2 would be to start the season.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

jpozz1996

anonymous96

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day