math731

Zuke is the goat

Member Since

May 9, 2017

Favourite Team

Montreal Canadiens

Forum Posts

4619

Posts per Day

1.9

Forum: Fauteuil - DGNov. 7 at 5:31 p.m.

Thread: Using our cap space

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fran615</b></div><div>As a hardcore Habs fan, all these trades are way too tilted in Montreal's favour.

I mean, that's the norm on this site. Everybody pulls the bed sheets their way, but this is a bit much though.</div></div>
I based the Savard one on a post made by a VAN fan earlier. The Garland-Mantha swap has been proposed by both teams fans for a month. How is the EDM one lopsided in MTLs favor? Campbells deal is probably the worst in the league. Teams have been paying a 1st for moving one year of players making similar money… Soup has got 3 more years after this season! Definitely would cost them the equivalent of 2 first to move (Holloway being equivalent to a first imo). Then theres the 2024 first/2024 second swap which is made equivalent by adding Allen and Kovacevic which IMO is even lopsided in EDMs favor.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsNov. 7 at 3:32 p.m.

Thread: Extra Cap Space While keeping depth

Bro wth is this lmao. Screwing MTL hard on this one ngl

Forum: Mock-DraftOct. 16 at 10:03 p.m.

Thread: 2024 October Rankings

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Good stuff.

Have been working on my rankings recently and will be a while before I get my top-32 sorted out, but can say....

1. One of the guys you've got outside your top-20 will be in my top-5
2. One of the guys you've got outside your top-56 will be in my top-20</div></div>

Lindstrom I bet

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 15 at 11:54 p.m.

Thread: Dumping Campbell and getting a G 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JeffGorton</b></div><div>remove one of the 1st rounders and maybe but even then i doubt it</div></div>

What? Campbell alone probably cost 2 1st to dump.

Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 14 at 10:26 p.m.

Thread: Dach inj

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hockeymecca</b></div><div>it's a minor one he'll be back in less than a week</div></div>

How can you know?

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 13 at 5:23 a.m.

Thread: If worse comes to worst

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>teams have 10% buffers in the offseason so you can just match then figure it out out before the season starts</div></div>

Yeah, but good luck trying to negotiate with other teams knowing youre in a ****ty position cap wise. Theyd probably have to pay twice the price to dump a guy like Goodrow AFTER tying an OS compared to not being forced to shed salary (not tying an OS).

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 9 at 9:43 p.m.

Thread: ideas

Youre overrating Dvorak and underrating Anderson by quite a lot. Anderson could fetch a first and a second if traded (which I hope he will btw because he doesnt fit our timeline anyway).

Forum: Fauteuil - DGJul. 9 at 5:43 p.m.

Thread: Cup Year

Would you do Murray and a first for Dvorak and a second?

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 29 at 11:32 p.m.

Thread: Future

Matheson would fetch much more with the season he just had and his contract

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27 at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: hook line and sinker

The only way I could see WAS moving the 8th pick is to move down (if they cant move up) as they might target one of the russians who might be available later. For that, wed need to acquire a pick in the teens and then talk from there.

The most logical trade would involve Anderson maybe to PIT for 14 and a salary. Then add whatever they want to move up.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26 at 4:23 p.m.

Thread: take a big step forward

Of course PIT takes that deal, it would cost a first to dump Granlund alone lol. I could see 31 for 14 and Granlund but not with 22 lol.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 23 at 4:47 p.m.

Thread: Trading Granlund

Just do 31 and Edmundson (50%) for 14 and Granlund.

Though I think MTL only does this if a guy like Benson falls at 11. If thats the case we can make the trade above than move up to 11 with VAN (who might also be open to move down).

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJun. 22 at 4:46 p.m.

Thread: Montreal RD help

Lol Barron is better than Boqvist

Forum: Fauteuil - DGJun. 18 at 4:26 p.m.

Thread: Benson and Leonard

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caufield</b></div><div>Highly doubt Benson falls to 11</div></div>
A lot of list say otherwise. Obviously, I like him a lot (would draft him 5th), but many teams might be scared of his size/speed.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17 at 11:53 a.m.

Thread: andlauer

Youre not getting a top 10 pick for DeBrincat. His value dropped and the draft is much better than last year when you guys paid the 7th OA for him.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17 at 11:52 a.m.

Thread: Cap space is a weapon

I think youd need to attach a second or a guy like Edmundson (who they definitely covet) to that PIT deal.

I really like the idea of moving up in the teens. A guy like Benson might even be available outside the top 10. If we could leave the draft with both Leonard and Benson, our offense would be set for thr next decade.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:56 p.m.

Thread: Interesting proposal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Not_Isles5513</b></div><div>Yeah but ur proposal is completely different and doesn’t really make sense for NY.</div></div>

How? If your 2nd rounder ends up being around 45-50 OA what do you think it would cost to move up to 20-25 (where your first is most likely to end up next year)?

Exactly, another 2nd rounder which happens to be an early one in a really good draft.

So basically, instead of giving the 45-50th OA pick, you're giving up the value between this pick and the 20-25th OA (basically the 37th OA).

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:53 p.m.

Thread: You know who

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boojets</b></div><div>Why the **** would a 22 yr old dmen that has never shown to be anything more then a #4-6 dmen be the jets target? Oh and Gally has 27.5mil left on his contract why would they take that on?</div></div>

Lol Barron produced at almost 0,5 ppg in his first season and represents a need for you guys. Thinking that wed be taking on the 8+ millions that Dubois will ask without sending any salary back is delusional imo

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:50 p.m.

Thread: Interesting proposal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Not_Isles5513</b></div><div>Ur literally betting on the isles to be bad. They would be better off buying him out unless they can dump him for less than a second. Maybe Bailey and a third for Walker on Philly, or something like that would make sense. That’s about it.</div></div>

Exactly. Its a risk for us. And I only made this trade based on all the Bailey and a second for nothing threads that I saw recently (and that were made by actual NYI fans). But I respect your opinion on the matter.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:40 p.m.

Thread: D and F

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JSEB93</b></div><div>I probably should have prefaced this by first saying I'm a Pens fan haha.

The issues with Carter though are 1) he still has to waive - which I don't see him doing for MTL and 2) Buying him out saves no money.

As far as Anderson I don't want that terrible contract anywhere near this team - with all due respect haha. I'd rather bite the bullet with Carter playing one season as 4th line/13th forward than pay heavily for Anderson at 4x5.5mil</div></div>

MTL wouldnt mind the buyout (despite the fact it doesnt save any money).

I respect your opinion on Anderson, but there's a reason Hughes reportedly refused many great offers in the last year for him. You probably have a certain opinion on him only based on his pts total, but if youd watch him play in the second half of the season (where he actually produced at well over 0,5pts/game), youd see just how dominant he is. And he's an absolute beauty in the playoffs.

Like many habs fans, I dont want him gone, but his age doesnt fit our timeline and itd be a shame to waste his best years.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:35 p.m.

Thread: Interesting proposal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Not_Isles5513</b></div><div>It’s an interesting proposal for Montreal, and should be a non-starter for the Islanders. Trading a first to dump bailey would be beyond moronic imo. Just buy him out at that point.</div></div>

Yeah but its the 37th OA pick (basically a late first in a great year). Next year's first could end up being in the late 20s (if you have a great season), which imo (based on the reports we have of the 2024 class) would probably give us a worst prospect than some of the guys available at 37th this year.

Considering the fact you barely have any prospects left, It could be smart to not lose a pick and simply move back a little (to dump Bailey).

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:32 p.m.

Thread: D and F

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JSEB93</b></div><div>Hard pass for me. The 14th overall pick shouldn't be in any trade that includes Anderson. I don't see any scenario where Carter waives to go to MTL anyways so the trade probably stops before it even starts.</div></div>

We could always buy Carter out (promise him before the trade), then he could sign with whoever he wants. Anderson would fit nicely with PIT and seems to be the kind of guy Dubas would target.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:30 p.m.

Thread: You know who

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>What_Are_you_Drouin</b></div><div>Jets easily declines, I love Gally but that contract is awful</div></div>

Need to send money back. And considering nobody wants to sign with you guys, now youd get a local boy who could show the way to the Perfetti, Lambert, etc. And you could always put him on LTIR if he gets hurt which wouldnt surprise me tbh.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14 at 12:20 p.m.

Thread: D and F

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jets12</b></div><div>it costs that second to dump carter so 14th overall for edmundson and anderson i think they decline that</div></div>

I also thought about something like that :

Anderson + Edmundson + Ylonen for Carter + 14th OA + top 16 protect 2024 first

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 28 at 7:04 p.m.

Thread: Taking on Myers

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Juiceman</b></div><div>I'm sure the Canucks rather keep the pick and select Leonard, Reinbacher, or Benson given the sad state of their prospect pool.... Tell me 1 reason why the Canucks would be this desparate to save 1 year of cap space?</div></div>

Theres just tons of reports saying VAN wants to trade some of their bad contracts to get out of their cap hell. Just look at what CGY paid us to take on one year of Monahan… Myers probably is an even bigger liability than Monahan since the later was put on LTIR for most of the year (and was really good when he wasnt). Myers is straight up bad

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

math731

Zuke is the goat

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day