mv21227

Member Since

Jul. 12, 2020

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

2nd Favourite Team

Colorado Avalanche

Forum Posts

10331

Posts per Day

7.4

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 11:54 a.m.

Thread: Marner Trade that Actually Works

Bro, even at 2.75M, Anderson wouldn't be worth it with his production. He has fourth line production. That would be a very expensive fourth liner. They could find a better or similar player for cheaper in free agency and not give away elite talent.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 11:27 a.m.

Thread: Marner Trade that Actually Works

but like how it this reasonable? Marner is a 95-100 point guy lol

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMay 3 at 11:25 p.m.

Thread: Everyone Else is Doing It but Lets Actually Be Fair Here

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>I think it only works with Nemec tbh. I was just trying to spitball a similar offer that you made just the other way around. The way I see it

Jack > Quinn (because of term mainly)
Miller > Hamilton
Hronek > Mercer (or maybe equal?)
Hoglander < Marino (Not too sure because I know Marino struggled a bit this year but he’s still a top 4 RHD)

Obviously neither are happening though, unless Jack and Luke decide they want to come be Quinn’s assistant captains /s</div></div>

And from my view it can't work without Hamilton in terms of cap and role. Luke Hamilton and Quinn can't all coincide on the same team and NJD can't afford Luke Quinn and Dougie

From a pure hockey perspective honestly Luke as the centerpiece of a quinn trade would make the most sense, but obviously would make no sense for non hockey reasons.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 3 at 3:45 p.m.

Thread: Are we better without AM34 and MR In

Canucks aren't gonna have any interest in Rielly. He's never gonna get any PP1 time which limits his value.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMay 2 at 11:05 p.m.

Thread: Kent Hughes Cheffing up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>XhekajsMySheriff</b></div><div>If Montreal has a top 3 pick this trade makes perfect sense.</div></div>

Wait, so where are each teams picks here? Cause if MTL are anything but 1, ANA declines, but if MTL are at 1, MTL declines

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 2 at 10:39 p.m.

Thread: next year

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Doubt the Canucks would be interested unless there’s quite a bit of retention. Nearly 6M for a defensive liability who puts up 30-35 points isn’t a great asset. He’s essentially a much worse version of Hronek for not that much cheaper than Hronek’s contract will come in at</div></div>

Im just joking. Pionk might be the worst dman in the league. Jets should just buy him out. If the rest of the NHL is smart then they would ask for at least a 2nd to take on his contract, if not a first.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 2 at 12:27 p.m.

Thread: Messing about

That BUF trade is bad for the Canucks. They'll be able to get a better package for Hronek if they do decide to trade him.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 9:53 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

Is this supposed to be a Matthew Tkachuk thread? Because seeing Pettersson on there is wildly optimistic.

Brady and Matthew are not the same player. Brady has better physical tools but doesn’t have anywhere near the toolbox Matthew has.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 9:52 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Pettersson straight up would be a massive overpay. Tkachuk is great but Sens fans make it seem like he’s some elite superstar when in reality he’s a good but not elite 1st liner</div></div>

I agree, Tkachuk is more of a first line player than a franchise player like even stutzle or Pettersson

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 8:49 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Have fun with that extension from ages 30 to 37 . Man your team is gonna be aging and declining badly in a bit</div></div>

Ah yes with a 25 year old Pettersson and a 24 year old Quinn Hughes I'm sure the decline is going to be off a cliff which would be really unfortunate because I'm not sure if you know this but Brady tkachuk is the exact same age as Quinn Hughes and Tkachuk hasn't done a single thing in this league, guess you guys are off to rebuild the rebuild

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 8:34 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>What does not being the better Tkachuk have to do with being overrated. Matthew is an elite playmaker , Brady is not</div></div>

Because Matthew does everything Brady does but better we've seen what a better version Brady gets in a trade and it's sure as **** alot less than what your claiming Brady would go for

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:13 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>All you understand about hockey is production got it. More points = better lmao . NOT

No GM would start a team with Bratt or Power over Brady</div></div>

Jesus dude ur just an angry fella hey. I'm well aware there is more to hockey than production for example, wins which the sens cant figure out

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 6:14 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

Only 1 of these players threw a temper tantrum at an empty net goal. I’d argue Brady is the “softest” of all the players you have listed here.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:58 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>You simply don’t trade a Tkachuk unless it’s an overpay.

He’s a unicorn .</div></div>

and Petey is a bonafide 90+ pt two way beast, which brady isnt.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:55 p.m.

Thread: Soft players Ive seen people offer for Brady

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I wouldn’t . Not a fan of Power at all.

I’d consider Pettersson but the extra 4 mill and added softness/injury concerns would make me say no</div></div>

and people thought Canucks fans were biased with how they felt abt Petey trades. Brady isnt the player Petey is and if you genuinley think hes more valuable I'd like whatever you're smoking

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsApr. 30 at 4:51 p.m.

Thread: Random Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gmonwy</b></div><div>Vancouver is getting FLEECED</div></div>

Anyone who reads this guys trades is getting fleeced.............

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 5:15 p.m.

Thread: Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Canucks

That trade is ass for the Canucks

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 4:53 p.m.

Thread: Montreal should consider trading 1st rounder this year

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jackaille</b></div><div>your best player is Johston, stop</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>I’m not a Stars fan. And while Johnston is great he’s not as good as Robertson or Heiskanen imo (although he could be in a year or two)</div></div>

I am a Stars fan. Johnston is fantastic & very realistically could be Dallas’ best player within the next couple of years, but right now he’s behind Robertson, Heiskanen, and Hintz.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 3:57 p.m.

Thread: Bye Demko Hello Silovs

I can't tell if this is supposed to be satire but moving on from your vezina nominee goaltender who is signed to 5 million a year just because a 23rd year old 6th round pick had an ok game might be the worst idea in Canucks history with all due respect. This move would take the Canucks tandem from being top 3 to bottom 5

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 1:12 p.m.

Thread: Blcokbuster

no body giving up assets for david kampf

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 12:59 p.m.

Thread: assa

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>I mean if we’re ranking the assets in the two trades it goes

Pettersson >>> Tkachuk >> Pinto >/= Hronek > Chychrun/Zub > Soucy >> Mikheyev/Juulsen

But if you want a top 10-15 player in the league in Pettersson in a hypothetical trade without giving up Stutzle or Sanderson then it costs Tkachuk++</div></div>

I’m okay with not trading for Pettey. The guys I don’t want to move are:

Tkachuk, Stutzle, Giroux, Pinto, Greig, Sanderson, Zub and 7th overall. I’m on the fence about Batherson but I’d upgrade Bath in a big blockbuster if there is one

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30 at 2:31 a.m.

Thread: Montreal should consider trading 1st rounder this year

DAL does this why?

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsApr. 29 at 6:40 p.m.

Thread: Marner - Sorokin framework

The most valuable piece in this trade from either side is Noah Dobson how do you expect to just slide him in here

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 7:11 p.m.

Thread: Nashville

Canucks aren't giving up a 1st for mid

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 12:54 p.m.

Thread: hmmmm

No chance the Canucks are doing that

First 234 Next

Page 3

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

mv21227

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day