pretzelcoatl Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 6 at 1:34 p.m.

Devils take that for sure. You're way overvaluing a guy who has never been an NHLer and missed the whole year with injury

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 10:59 p.m.

Thread: Something different

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CoachJoseph</b></div><div>First things first, since we don't see NJD games out West, do you see Mercer as a full-time C, cause I thought he was a RW?</div></div>

Better at wing but could still become a quality center. Value similar to Byram, not whatever this is.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 10:58 p.m.

Thread: Something different

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Cub19</b></div><div>Yes mercer is a 1st rd pick. He was drafted in the Taylor hall trade.

Mercer fits the avs bill.</div></div>

.........not the point

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 10:57 p.m.

Thread: Realistic deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devsfan25</b></div><div>Already thought of that. Cap is 87.7 next year and 92.1 in 25-26
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868853</div></div>

Clearly you did not think of that, because you still haven't accounted for bonus overages. Very high probability you're over the cap there

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 9:42 p.m.

Thread: Something different

I'm sorry do you know who Dawson Mercer is or did you pick young players at random and assume they were mid

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 9:41 p.m.

Thread: Realistic deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devsfan25</b></div><div>https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868824

Sure about that?</div></div>

We will have significant bonus overages, as much as 5.5m of dead cap each of the next two years. Likely closer to 3m but still needs to be accounted for. And the big cap crunch is 2025-26

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 9:11 p.m.

Thread: Realistic deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devsfan25</b></div><div>Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious</div></div>

We don't have the cap space to make it work after this year or next, especially since we need a goalie

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 8:42 p.m.

Thread: Big Move

Devils can't really afford Buch long term, otherwise I'd have considered it. Blais would get waived immediately.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 28 at 12:30 p.m.

Thread: DNVR Aggressive

Devils can't really fit Byram and have no incentive to trade Mercer for a package. Maybe if this were part of a three way deal for an elite goalie, but as it stands it's not appealing.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 27 at 6:24 p.m.

Thread: Flames retool

No retenion = no deal for Markstrom

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 26 at 5:09 p.m.

Thread: Lotto Lives On

So the Devils are going to retain for a more expensive downgrade rental and nothing else?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 25 at 3:06 p.m.

Thread: A TDL that provides a future

Insulting offer for Holtz

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 24 at 5:48 p.m.

Thread: Ferraro and Coleman

First for Coleman unretained gets Fitz fired on the spot

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 24 at 5:31 p.m.

Thread: What is the asking price

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>More than that. Holtz and Farrell are the same draft class.

Holtz 21-22 vs Farrell 23-24.</div></div>

Oh right I misread Farrell's page. Should have said D+4

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 24 at 5:29 p.m.

Thread: What is the asking price

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sens65</b></div><div>I suppose i underestimated how much the Devils value Holtz. The players are the same age and both have put up solid numbers in the AHL, the 2nd is to make up for the fact that Holtz has been good in the NHL and has higher potential.</div></div>

Holtz's D+2 AHL numbers are significantly better than Farrell's D+4 AHL numbers

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 10:08 p.m.

Thread: What is the asking price

The asking price is <em>*click* *dial tone*</em>

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 10:08 p.m.

Thread: What is the asking price

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sens65</b></div><div>Sean Farrell and a 2nd round pick?</div></div>

....do you actually think the Devils would take that

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 3:16 p.m.

Thread: Flames

Devils decline. Too soon to say if we will be buyers, we can't extend Hanifin, and Markstrom without retention is not an option.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22 at 10:04 p.m.

Thread: Blue Devils

That's an insane ask for Buch

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22 at 12:17 a.m.

Thread: Trading our top 5v5 scorer

Not at all worth it for NJ. Gibson is having a better year than his previous ones but he is still average at best

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 9:20 p.m.

Thread: Do nothing deadline alternative

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>Then you should hold onto him. I don't see him having that kind of value across the league. Especially not for a team like NSH, who already has a potential superstar goalie prospect.</div></div>

I'd think the opposite. Just look at Boston. If Askarov is the starter of the future, Schmid would make it a frightening tandem. Devils already have Daws, who is more or less at the same level as Schmid, and are in need of that guaranteed starter.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 7:39 p.m.

Thread: Do nothing deadline alternative

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>I don't see why he'd be worth that much. He might have been in the summer, coming off a hot playoff performance. But that's a small sample size, and he's crashed back down to earth hard since then. Even a 3rd feels overly generous,</div></div>

He's still a high quality goaltending prospect. I'd rather him than any goalie available in a typical 2nd round

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 6:18 p.m.

Thread: Calgary Rebuild

Vladar to NJ. m a k e i t s t o p

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 6:17 p.m.

Thread: Do nothing deadline alternative

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>A bigger return than what's essentially one 1st (slightly more or slightly less than a 1st, depending on how much one values Schmid, in comparison to a 3rd)? Let's see...

ARI got a 1st, 3rd & a prospect (Timmins) for Kuemper

ANA got a 1st & a 2nd for Andersen

NSH got a 1st & two 2nds for Vokoun

SJ got a 1st and a prospect (Kuraly) for Jones

WSH got a 1st & a 2nd for Varlamov (just a bit outside the 20 year window)

BUF got a 1st, 3rd, a prospect (Carrier), and a guy they flipped for a 2nd a year later (Stewart) for Miller (with a rental depth piece added by each side)

And how many of those guys were as good as Saros? The goalies never get good returns fallacy persists because star goalies in their prime get traded so infrequently. Everyone just thinks goalies have no trade value because they see struggling/washed up/overpaid ones hit waivers more frequently.

MAF getting traded for nothing was a very unusual situation. VGK was in cap hell, and the guy was 36 at the time. Even then, CHI was still able to get a 2nd for him, as a deadline rental.</div></div>

Schmid ought to be worth a 2nd, no?

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 21 at 4:29 p.m.

Thread: Maybe how they finish it

Devils accept. Getting full retention makes the price seem fair to me

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

pretzelcoatl

n.1 Topias Vilen fan

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day