SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic deadline

Created by: AdamL188
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 4, 2024
Published: Feb. 4, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Peeke, Andrew
  2. 2024 4th round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Vladar, Daniel
  2. 2025 7th round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Bahl, Kevin
  2. Stillman, Chase
  3. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
  4. 2025 3rd round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Hanifin, Noah ($2,475,000 retained)
Additional Details:
7x7 extension
3.
CGY
  1. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
(3rd is only if the Leafs reach ECF)
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$77,895,832$0$1,077,500$5,604,168
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$855,833$855,833
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 4 at 8:46 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 1,340
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious
Feb. 4 at 8:47 p.m.
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 3,161
Hefty price for a rental. If the bidding goes that high maybe but I don’t think it will
Feb. 4 at 8:55 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 173
Likes: 81
Columbus doesn’t need Vladar. I’m sure they’d get better offers for Peeke
Feb. 4 at 8:58 p.m.
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Columbus doesn't need Vladar when they already have Merzlikins and Tarasov. And Hanifin is going home to Boston and there's already a deal in place for Hanifin for whatever team acquires him 8 x $7,500,000 per Conroy.
Feb. 4 at 9:00 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,453
Likes: 3,190
Quoting: Devsfan25
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious


Tough call there. Draft pedigree says Stillman but stats say Clarke might be a better choice. Then again Stillman isn't a pending RFA (Clarke is) and will be under team control longer.
AdamL188 and donald liked this.
Feb. 4 at 9:00 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,852
Likes: 1,982
Quoting: dgibb10
Hefty price for a rental. If the bidding goes that high maybe but I don’t think it will


Thats with an extension imo, otherwise pass. Keep the retention, Bahl and a 1st, maybe add the third to push it over.
Go get Ned, Trenin, Dumaime and one other defender (gotta find a couple schekles, or move a body)
Feb. 4 at 9:01 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
AdamL188
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 266
Likes: 58
Quoting: dgibb10
Hefty price for a rental. If the bidding goes that high maybe but I don’t think it will


it says 7x7 extension directly on the trade
Feb. 4 at 9:02 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
AdamL188
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 266
Likes: 58
Quoting: Devsfan25
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious


prolly Clarke
Feb. 4 at 9:05 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
AdamL188
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 266
Likes: 58
Quoting: Dave26
Columbus doesn’t need Vladar. I’m sure they’d get better offers for Peeke


My guess is if they had offers for Peeke they'd take it. Jiricek is stuck in the AHL waiting for a Peeke trade so they'll go quickly. Same with Dustin Wolf for the flames.
CaseyFlyman liked this.
Feb. 4 at 9:09 p.m.
#10
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 3,161
Quoting: AdamL188
it says 7x7 extension directly on the trade


Yeah magically saying “with extension” doesn’t make a rental not a rental value
Feb. 4 at 9:11 p.m.
#11
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 3,161
Quoting: Smitty426
Thats with an extension imo, otherwise pass. Keep the retention, Bahl and a 1st, maybe add the third to push it over.
Go get Ned, Trenin, Dumaime and one other defender (gotta find a couple schekles, or move a body)


With an extension isn’t a real thing that increases rental value imo
Feb. 4 at 9:11 p.m.
#12
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,928
Likes: 2,577
Quoting: Devsfan25
Deal. Think this deal is good for both sides. Would you rather Stillman or Clarke. I’d do either but I’m just curious


We don't have the cap space to make it work after this year or next, especially since we need a goalie
Feb. 4 at 9:29 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 1,340
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
We don't have the cap space to make it work after this year or next, especially since we need a goalie


https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868824

Sure about that?
Feb. 4 at 9:41 p.m.
#14
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,928
Likes: 2,577
Quoting: Devsfan25
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868824

Sure about that?


We will have significant bonus overages, as much as 5.5m of dead cap each of the next two years. Likely closer to 3m but still needs to be accounted for. And the big cap crunch is 2025-26
Feb. 4 at 9:48 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,852
Likes: 1,982
Quoting: dgibb10
With an extension isn’t a real thing that increases rental value imo


No I'm saying dint trade for him as a rental, that's all.
No need to give up those assets unless they are keeping him.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 4 at 10:28 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 1,748
That's a yes from me, under the assumption that Columbus looks to move Tarasov too (or waive him). He's been anywhere from bad to atrocious this year. Vladar would be a good backup until Greaves is fully ready, and getting Peeke out the door ASAP is an objectively good thing for the organization.
Feb. 4 at 10:29 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 1,340
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
We will have significant bonus overages, as much as 5.5m of dead cap each of the next two years. Likely closer to 3m but still needs to be accounted for. And the big cap crunch is 2025-26


Already thought of that. Cap is 87.7 next year and 92.1 in 25-26
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868853
Feb. 4 at 10:57 p.m.
#18
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,928
Likes: 2,577
Quoting: Devsfan25
Already thought of that. Cap is 87.7 next year and 92.1 in 25-26
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4868853


Clearly you did not think of that, because you still haven't accounted for bonus overages. Very high probability you're over the cap there
Feb. 4 at 11:14 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 1,340
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
Clearly you did not think of that, because you still haven't accounted for bonus overages. Very high probability you're over the cap there


Still have 1.9m in cap left here and that’s with 23 guys. If we have to carry 22 or even 21, you do it. Cup winning teams rarely are able to carry full roster during the year
Feb. 5 at 3:06 a.m.
#20
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 878
Quoting: AdamL188
it says 7x7 extension directly on the trade


What's the point in negotiating the extension at 7x7, when the whole point of acquiring him is to have the leverage of an 8th year over other teams?

Also, I doubt Hanifin gets a smaller return than Lindholm given he is having a better year and is younger.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll