SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sabertooth12

Member Since
Mar. 22, 2019
Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
Forum Posts
332
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 4, 2020 at 10:46 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>I think the people that disagree have common sense and understand that 50-55 point center doesn’t get you a 8th overall pick. what part of this speeds up the rebuild. Does domi make this team better than Toronto Boston or Tampa? How about Pittsburgh Washington philly CBJ islanders or Rangers? Imo no. So if Eichel wants out get a massive return and do an actual rebuild like the rangers did. Quick and intelligently. Getting slightly better but still not being a playoff team seems stupid when giving up a major asset</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>I think the people that disagree have common sense and understand that 50-55 point center doesn’t get you a 8th overall pick. what part of this speeds up the rebuild. Does domi make this team better than Toronto Boston or Tampa? How about Pittsburgh Washington philly CBJ islanders or Rangers? Imo no. So if Eichel wants out get a massive return and do an actual rebuild like the rangers did. Quick and intelligently. Getting slightly better but still not being a playoff team seems stupid when giving up a major asset</div></div>

And I think the people who agree that Domi is worth 8th OVA and are the ones that have a better understanding of hockey in general! They know that a proven NHL top 6 talent is worth more than the hope that an 8th OVA prospect will be an impact player. Being a high draft pick garuntees nothing take Puljujarvi for example picked what was it 3rd OVA really has not done much! Or how about Galchenyuk again a 3rd OVA pick and is on his what 5th team since being drafted! Or how about any of Buffalos own 4 8th OVA selections are any of them better than Domi? Nope! Prospects are great when they work out but of the 200+ drafted a year only something like 20% ever make the NHL and maybe 10% are impact players.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 4, 2020 at 10:20 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 4, 2020 at 10:11 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 4, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 3, 2020 at 12:14 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 2, 2020 at 3:50 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 2, 2020 at 2:34 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>They'd be foolish to not consider it, IMO. You are WAY overvaluing the draft pick and WAY overestimating the Sabres ability to get that pick right.

Between 2001 and 2015 there were 39 forwards taken with picks <strong>4-7</strong>. If we rearrange them by P/GP performance we can see the odds of getting a difference-maker:

Superstar (1.00+ P/GP): 0/39 = 0%
Elite (0.75 - 0.99): 8/39 = 20.5%
Top-6 (0.50 - 0.74): 17/39 = 43.6%
Bottom-6 (&lt; 0.50): 14/39 = 35.9%

I did that research when Buffalo was slotted to get the 7th pick, but since they're now picking 8th lets repeat the procedure but with picks 8-10. Forwards only, from 2001 to 2015 inclusive:

Superstar (1.00+ P/GP): 0/27 = 0%
Elite (0.75 - 0.99): 2/27 = 7.4%
Top-6 (0.50 - 0.74): 11/27 = 40.7%
Bottom-6 (&lt; 0.50): 14/27 = 51.9%

High picks are great, but (cap aside) if you have a chance to trade your #8 pick for an established player in his early 20's who scores 0.67 P/GP you shouldn't dismiss that as "foolish". Only 2 of the players in the Top-6 range matched or exceeded 0.67 P/GP, meaning that you typically have a 14.8% chance of getting a player equal to or better (offensively) than Domi with that pick. AGAIN, it depends on who is available there, but to dismiss the notion of trading the pick so hastily is foolish.</div></div>

<a href="/users/Shibbal18" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Shibbal18</a> <a href="/users/SalamiCheese" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@SalamiCheese</a> <a href="/users/sabertooth12" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@sabertooth12</a> <a href="/users/MartianKiwi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@MartianKiwi</a>

You guys might like the odds I posted above.