SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

tdash11

Member Since
Jun. 13, 2022
Favourite Team
Dallas Stars
2nd Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
Forum Posts
42
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 2, 2023 at 12:00 p.m.
Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 15, 2023 at 11:22 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 28, 2022 at 10:19 a.m.
Thread: Klinger on a short term deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Isles5513</b></div><div>Not too far off based on the Norris deal. Only issue is Robertson may be closer to Tkachuck territory in terms of talent.</div></div>

Playoff Robertson worries me, he disappeared, I think he will live up to any contract under 8.25, anything above that is a huge gamble considering they have to find $ to sign Roope Hintz. Benn and Seguin contracts really hurt Dallas in terms of free money to give away. Maybe they go short term with robo and then pay him when Benn's contract comes off the books three years from now.

This is not a team I want to be a GM of right now. Way too many bad contracts.

On your Gurianov trade, maybe he is but to me I would dump him for a cheeseburger. He is a one dimensional player that panics under pressure and I don't see Dallas extending him past this year so anything is better than nothing.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 22, 2022 at 11:34 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 12, 2022 at 5:25 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 12, 2022 at 5:20 p.m.
Thread: ouch it burns
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheMooterus</b></div><div>Don't like this if I'm Dallas. No shot Dallas can sign Kane after the season, so you're trading an entire career of Bourque for 1 season of Kane. Given the team that Dallas currently has, Kane doesn't make them Cup Contenders. I have an extremely hard time moving a kid that looks like a true future top-6 center for someone that isn't going to bring Dallas to a Cup (hint, other than McDavid I don't see 1 forward making Dallas Cup Contenders. They're still a couple of pieces away).

The Burns deal isn't horrible (and tbh, that kind of retention is the only way I'm pursuing that kind trade), but Dallas is already such an old team. They really don't need to be adding a 37-year old defenseman to their already old group of players. If he's an absolute last resort then Dallas may be able to stomach a move like that, but there are a number of better options available via trade or free agency that need to be higher on the priority list than a defenseman that's signed until he's 40

You're also giving Oettinger 2 years &amp; roughly $1M more than you should be. Don't give him any more than a 3 year deal and keep it around $4M</div></div>

If oettinger was going to take 4 mil they would've signed it by now... Georgiev got almost 4 mil and he was a bad backup last year... And if Jack Campbell really is getting 5x5 from Edmonton which is the rumor.... Oettinger deserves at least that. Have to move with the market.

Burns controls a lot of where he goes... he has a permanent Texas residence and would probably only come to Dallas, which gives the Stars leverage to ask for however much salary retention they want.. I can see it happening.

The Kane thing is tough... of the three headed prospect monster at center, I think I would rather lose Borque than Stankhoven or Johnston and to get Kane and have the hawks keep salary it is going to take one of the 3 they have there plus a pick at least... but who knows what Chicago is thinking after the fiasco they had at the draft
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 5, 2022 at 9:08 a.m.