SalarySwishSalarySwish

How much could we pay Point

Team: 2019-20 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 22, 2019
Published: Sep. 22, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Assuming we trade everyone consuming cap without an NHL spot, don't trade any roster players, continue with a full 23 man roster, and refuse to take any risk of performance overages, ignoring the impossible position we would be in next year, this is the maximum we could pay Point.

I'm guessing ANA says no to this specific deal, but hopefully if we try hard enough we could trade those people somewhere. If not, Point has to take a very cheap bridge deal, I guess. In theory, we could pay Point more if we don't have Volkov on the team (I put him as a scratch but I'm thinking he'll actually be part of a rotation with Maroon or something), but it seems like he's secured a spot. I guess we can go a tiny bit over $9m if Volkov goes to Syracuse.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$8,950,002
Trades
TBL
  1. 2021 7th round pick (ANA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,137,500$0$1,362,500$1,362,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,950,002$8,950,002
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$147,500$148K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,300,000$1,300,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$864,167$864,167
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Sep. 22, 2019 at 7:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
you can exceed the caps upper limit for performance bonuses (i think you can go 7.5% over), so thats an extra $1,362,500 right there
Sep. 22, 2019 at 7:07 p.m.
#2
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
Edited Sep. 22, 2019 at 7:13 p.m.
I think term would be less for that much money cause of we was gonna sign for that, would have happened already


And didnt Tampa already strike out on trading Louie?
Sep. 22, 2019 at 7:21 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 3,695
So you could either make a trade or pay him a bridge. Like 3 years at that money.
Trickster liked this.
Sep. 22, 2019 at 8:00 p.m.
#4
Who adds what?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 13,677
Likes: 2,703
I'm not sure you can get assets back for Condon and Domingue at their current cap hits, but it shouldn't cost more than a 6th or 7th to trade one to a team like Fla, CBJ, or Col, where they have a chance to play NHL backup this year. Schenn cleared waivers last fall and would have no buried cap hit. Rutta probably would not clear waivers, but if he does, pair him with a 4th and ship him to Winnipeg. 23 players is a luxury. No bonus overages is a luxury.

The Cap situation next summer is that Tampa will have to trade any two of Point, Sergachev, Vasilevsky, or Kucherov.

Tampa can give Point a choice between 10.5Mx6 with no NTC, or cheap bridge with an NMC, if he wants to guarantee he stays in Tampa a little longer, like Shattenkirk and Killorn. He can do what he wants, but his agent will probably advise him to sign a big long term contract and accept the likelihood that he has to move next summer, unless he can convince the team that he's somehow more essential, long term, than Kucherov.

The simpler solution would be to trade Point now for picks and prospects.
Sep. 22, 2019 at 8:34 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 517
Likes: 214
Quoting: moli92
you can exceed the caps upper limit for performance bonuses (i think you can go 7.5% over), so thats an extra $1,362,500 right there


Really? I know BriseBois said he was worried about performance bonuses when he traded Callahan, and that wouldn’t really have made sense if we could have 7.5% of the cap in leeway (in fact, it would have just hurt our cap situation because of Condon).
See All