The Debrusk idea

I still wouldn't do it. It's not good for us. Reason I don't want to trade Dunn is because Gunnarsson is just so injury prone You aren't running him at 100%.

Tbh I could see this trade just being Debrusk and a 3rd for Dunn, decent deal for both teams.

you don't have to, you have Mikkola and Perunovich. Also Lauzon should be above Bortuzzo imo

At the moment, I'd prefer to keep Dunn and Sandy.






Heh. By what possible metric should Lauzon be above Bortz? Probably one day, but that day ain't today.

Boston would not do that. Debrusk has averaged 25g per 82 despite a slump last year. Still improving. Dunn is just a bit bigger version of Grzelyck with a bit more offense. He is not the 1st pair d man they need. With nothing to replace Debrusk they are not moving him 1 for 1 for an average 2nd pair type who is better offensively than defensively. Certainly not adding a pick to go with it. Having Grizz and Dunn as top 4 LD is still better than what they have but it’s still sketchy. And they give up a chunk of offense they can’t replace internally. The OP makes more sense for Boston. But even then i doubt they do it.