Next Year

Way too much for Danault.

insted of a 1m depth d give that to a 22yo mete

Mete likely won't resign to be a depth option. His rights are most likely traded in the offseason.

doubt but ok

I really like your 1st line. Although I understood what you said about Lehkonen, you are weakening that line. Danault was a first line C for 3 years and the most he ever got was 13 goals. By taking an offensive player in Tuna off his line and putting a defensive minded player in Lehky, you are lowering that offensive threat of that line. Your 3rd line is lethal. Can Caufield step in right away out of college? time will tell. Some have done it but most needed a year or two. Your 4th line is interesting. Poehling as a LW, we have not seen him play all season. Maybe he is much better at C. Maybe move Evans up to 3rd C and put Poehling on 4th to start next season and see how he does.

On D, your scenario has Chiarot gone. I like the fact you kept Edmundson and Petry together as most on here keep lowering Edmundson when he has done so well with Petry. Can Romanov handle top 4 minutes? he started season well, but last few games has run around a little. Is he ready. I like you kept Kulak as your 5th d-man as I do not find him to be a top 4 D. yes he can skate but not much else. Fleury as your 6 D is a good choice.