SalarySwishSalarySwish

I dont know

Created by: Stgstg55
Team: 2020-21 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 18, 2021
Published: Mar. 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Trades
WSH
  1. Henrique, Adam
  2. Steel, Sam
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (ANA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$69,127,583$0$982,500$12,372,417
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$820,000$820,000
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$745,000$745,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,500,000$4,500,000 ($3,425,000$3M$3,425,000$3M)
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Mar. 18, 2021 at 11:37 a.m.
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,942
Likes: 25,740
Personally, I think that game against the Avalanche was a firing offense.

Six unanswered goals and only Nic DesLauriers seemed to resist.
Salzy, csick and Stgstg55 liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 11:39 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,160
Likes: 5,984
Things are going to get worse before they get better, buckle up it'll be a long ride

Quoting: OldNYIfan
Personally, I think that game against the Avalanche was a firing offense.

Six unanswered goals and only Nic DesLauriers seemed to resist.


This entire season has been a firing offence, im for the scorched earth approach and bring in a whole new front office/coaching staff
Stgstg55 and Lenny7 liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:11 p.m.
#3
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: Salzy
Things are going to get worse before they get better, buckle up it'll be a long ride

This entire season has been a firing offence, im for the scorched earth approach and bring in a whole new front office/coaching staff


@HadesOfSoCal (added you because we might as well all discuss)...

I think GMBM gets a one year pass, for the sole fact that he's managed to build the farm up a bit. Eakins and crew need to be gutted though. It's absolutely laughable that this team is this bad. IMO, with the right coach/leadership, this team should have been fighting for a wildcard. The main reason Eakins was hired was because he had already worked with a lot of the young guys that were coming up, but developmentally, it really hasn't translated, unfortunately. It's getting to the point where their poor asset management is now affecting the value of their key assets, which is ridiculous. Anyone who watches John Gibson play knows that he's easily one of the top goaltenders in the league, but from a numbers standpoint, mainly due to systems that Eakins has put into place, he doesn't stand a chance. He's a bottom 10 starter if you look at the numbers, which is an absolute crock of $hit. On GMBM's side though, waiving him was possibly the dumbest thing I've ever seen. You waived a guy that was absolutely underperforming from a counting stats perspective, but every outlier available showed that it wasn't regression, and rather a case of a small sample size being used to judge a player. He showed his hand, nobody picked him up (Nobody was going to claim anyone that's making above $1.5 mil this year anyway), but the value that he has was pretty much flushed down the toilet, so that the team could "Send a message".

Great friggin' message.

Hire someone that can competently implement a system, and add from there. Don't get me wrong, I have no qualms about firing Murray, but I'll reserve judgement until I see what happens at the trade deadline.
Stgstg55 liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:21 p.m.
#4
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
Quoting: Lenny7
HadesOfSoCal (added you because we might as well all discuss)...

I think GMBM gets a one year pass, for the sole fact that he's managed to build the farm up a bit. Eakins and crew need to be gutted though. It's absolutely laughable that this team is this bad. IMO, with the right coach/leadership, this team should have been fighting for a wildcard. The main reason Eakins was hired was because he had already worked with a lot of the young guys that were coming up, but developmentally, it really hasn't translated, unfortunately. It's getting to the point where their poor asset management is now affecting the value of their key assets, which is ridiculous. Anyone who watches John Gibson play knows that he's easily one of the top goaltenders in the league, but from a numbers standpoint, mainly due to systems that Eakins has put into place, he doesn't stand a chance. He's a bottom 10 starter if you look at the numbers, which is an absolute crock of $hit. On GMBM's side though, waiving him was possibly the dumbest thing I've ever seen. You waived a guy that was absolutely underperforming from a counting stats perspective, but every outlier available showed that it wasn't regression, and rather a case of a small sample size being used to judge a player. He showed his hand, nobody picked him up (Nobody was going to claim anyone that's making above $1.5 mil this year anyway), but the value that he has was pretty much flushed down the toilet, so that the team could "Send a message".

Great friggin' message.

Hire someone that can competently implement a system, and add from there. Don't get me wrong, I have no qualms about firing Murray, but I'll reserve judgement until I see what happens at the trade deadline.


Eakins for sure should be gone. But if Murray continues to trade for young assets it could be benefital. But if he buys veterans he needs to go.
Lenny7 liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,160
Likes: 5,984
Quoting: Lenny7
HadesOfSoCal (added you because we might as well all discuss)...

I think GMBM gets a one year pass, for the sole fact that he's managed to build the farm up a bit. Eakins and crew need to be gutted though. It's absolutely laughable that this team is this bad. IMO, with the right coach/leadership, this team should have been fighting for a wildcard. The main reason Eakins was hired was because he had already worked with a lot of the young guys that were coming up, but developmentally, it really hasn't translated, unfortunately. It's getting to the point where their poor asset management is now affecting the value of their key assets, which is ridiculous. Anyone who watches John Gibson play knows that he's easily one of the top goaltenders in the league, but from a numbers standpoint, mainly due to systems that Eakins has put into place, he doesn't stand a chance. He's a bottom 10 starter if you look at the numbers, which is an absolute crock of $hit. On GMBM's side though, waiving him was possibly the dumbest thing I've ever seen. You waived a guy that was absolutely underperforming from a counting stats perspective, but every outlier available showed that it wasn't regression, and rather a case of a small sample size being used to judge a player. He showed his hand, nobody picked him up (Nobody was going to claim anyone that's making above $1.5 mil this year anyway), but the value that he has was pretty much flushed down the toilet, so that the team could "Send a message".

Great friggin' message.

Hire someone that can competently implement a system, and add from there. Don't get me wrong, I have no qualms about firing Murray, but I'll reserve judgement until I see what happens at the trade deadline.


GMBM will be allowed to "play out" his contract more likely than not, the Samuellis, while tremendous owners may be a touch too loyal if he is allowed to do so. Eakins getting hired has screamed Jeff Blashill to me (mainly becuase the Wings are the team closest to me geographically) but there are a ton of similarities between the two. Eakins was and in my mind still would be a good AHL coach, but he shouldnt be an NHL coach. Every single day Eakins still has a job hurts the Ducks in the future, if there was one move I could make regarding any player/staff member firing Eakins would without doubt be the move I make.

GMBM is in a tough spot, but his insane claim that this is a competitive roster is the main reason he has to go, at best we are a team that is lost in purgatory, not bad enough for the basement but not good enough for the playoffs. Again like I said I believe the Samuellis will allow him to finish his contract.

Heres a quote from an Athletic article about a year ago now: (About GMBM) “The Ducks must take steps forward now. They may have to start winning for his sake. His contract is up in 2022. He sold the Samuelis on a roster retooling that had to be done, that’s still in the process of doing. These owners are extraordinarily patient but until this fruitless two-year stretch, they’ve been used to playoff money coming in. No GM has a lifetime deal. How much longer will he be allowed to have the keys?”
Lenny7 liked this.
See All