ducks

I’m thinking u would have to pay a bit more to direct them to Heinen. There’s guys like fluery as well open. Jones I have protected but that opens up other guys you are trading here so I see where your going. I like these moves. I dream of rakell actually playing with superstars again. With edm would be just mean.

Why pay Seattle to take Heinen? My protection list with those trades before the draft (7-3-1): Rakell, Steel, Jones, Terry, Lundeström, Henrique, Volkov - Fowler, Lindholm, Fleury - Gibson
The only other player I see them taking is Mahura. And you could even protect him over Fowler because let's be real no way they take him with that contract. They likely wouldn't take Silfvy because of his hip injury. So yeah no real reason to give up a pick imo.

Henrique probably won't get a 2nd round pick. Not even with 50% retained.

The line up is a bit of a mess:
Silvy to RW, swap Jones with Volkov and Steel with Grant, Deslauriers to LW. Comtois-Zegras-Terry, Jones-Getzlaf-Silfvy, Milano-Lundeström-Volkov, Deslauriers-Steel-Grant
And there is no way Guhle>Mahura and Larsson and Shattenkirk>Drysdale, especially since Drysdale would have to got to the CHL if he doesn't play in the NHL.

That trade with Edmonton won't happen. The Oilers would be very happy to have Rakell, but Holland isn't going to give up Lavoie and a 2nd round pick unless the player he's getting is under team control for at least three seasons.

If the pens are trading Legare, Poulin, or POJ it is in a package to get either Rakell, Gibson, or both. So no thanks. Pens pass.

Meh. Rather keep KK