SalarySwishSalarySwish

Where Drury Stands At Noon

Created by: BSpadaro83
Team: 2021-22 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 28, 2021
Published: Jul. 28, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Dont blow it you bum. The Buch return stunk and Goodrow was an overpay. Big day for seeing how dumb this FO really is.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,150,000
1$950,000
6$6,000,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$69,662,302$0$8,400,000$11,837,698
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,150,000$2,150,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,425,000$2,425,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 28, 2021 at 8:14 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 759
because you would do a better job?
cupofcoco liked this.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 8:24 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,056
Likes: 12,065
Since the Sens are reportedly in on Ryan Strome, I'm hoping the answer is really dumb.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 9:05 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 2,538
Buch trade was great asset management.. certainly don’t want him at that contract if he is blocking Kakko and Kravs. Considering he might have got more in arbitration this was the better path. Also only 2 teams had any interest in the guy, we took the best offer since no other teams valued him enough to make a better offer, let alone an offer at all. Goodrow, Blais and nemeth are all guys we need and want. He hasn’t made a bad move yet. Drafting was actually better in hindsight, yes we all demanded a C in the 1st round but we did good and got a C in the 3rd round who will be a 2/3C guy in 3-4 years when needed.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 9:18 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 877
Quoting: NYR1983
Buch trade was great asset management.. certainly don’t want him at that contract if he is blocking Kakko and Kravs. Considering he might have got more in arbitration this was the better path. Also only 2 teams had any interest in the guy, we took the best offer since no other teams valued him enough to make a better offer, let alone an offer at all. Goodrow, Blais and nemeth are all guys we need and want. He hasn’t made a bad move yet. Drafting was actually better in hindsight, yes we all demanded a C in the 1st round but we did good and got a C in the 3rd round who will be a 2/3C guy in 3-4 years when needed.


In a year where the Rangers had tons of Cap space, they could have brought back Buchnevich for 1 year. Waited until more suitors arrived at the Trade Deadline, and then moved him for greater return. I like Blais, but there are more Blais' than Buch's out there to choose from.

Since it sounds like Nemeth is getting a 3 year deal, that makes 2 Free Agent signings of bottom tier Roster players that were way longer than they should have been.
BSpadaro83 liked this.
Jul. 28, 2021 at 9:21 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 2,538
Quoting: Shakabakes
In a year where the Rangers had tons of Cap space, they could have brought back Buchnevich for 1 year. Waited until more suitors arrived at the Trade Deadline, and then moved him for greater return. I like Blais, but there are more Blais' than Buch's out there to choose from.

Since it sounds like Nemeth is getting a 3 year deal, that makes 2 Free Agent signings of bottom tier Roster players that were way longer than they should have been.

I agree about the cap space point. But in the same argument I don’t want him as 1RW when the 2 more important kids could be there, then Buch as 3RW will lose value at 6M cap hit. Better to have Blais as 3RW or Goodrow or sign someone to a 1yr deal with cap space we have. But I get that we have the cap space
Shakabakes liked this.
See All