SalarySwishSalarySwish

After More Information - Accurate

Created by: LogicOnly
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 28, 2021
Published: Jul. 28, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Buffalo let Vegas know they wanted Hague, Krebs, a 1st, and Rielly Smith for Jack Eichel. This was confirmed.
Hague - Young top 4 defensive prospect (accurate rating confirmed)
Krebs - Young top 6 forward prospect (accurate rating confirmed)
1st rounder - bottom 20 because of Vegas' position
Reilly smith - roster player, middle 6 (Unconfirmed - he has hit 30 and has declined in the past 2 years, so may be a bottom 6 forward? But for the sake of this arguement, we are going to give him the benefit of the doubt)

Point is: This trade is Factually accurate, so not comments saying its a bad trade or you will be ignored. My question is: do the bruins accept it or not? If you dont want the bruins to do it, thats another story, but in terms of value, it is 100% correct. Debate, and do it respectfully! And again, no debating whether buffalo does it or not, because they factually would.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
2$5,000,000
2$1,350,000
1$1,250,000
Trades
BUF
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Debrusk > Reilly Smith (younger too, so much more value)
Hague > Urho (though not by much because they are both still young and bruins had an influx of LHD)
Studnicka < Krebs (Again not by much at all, but even moreover, he replaces Eichel
and the 1st is the same (a bottom 20)...

So it is factually the same trade (if not better because of debrusk)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,835,674$1,956,507$125,000$664,326
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
RW
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 2
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 28, 2021 at 11:26 a.m.
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,871
Likes: 5,858
Trade bad
Jul. 28, 2021 at 11:27 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,861
Likes: 8,867
Krebs is miles better than Studnicka. That;s the difference

And Vegas is out of division
Jul. 28, 2021 at 11:30 a.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Trade bad


Ah yes, a troll. Leave or come back with more valuable information
Jul. 28, 2021 at 11:31 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,918
Likes: 14,590
Nothing has been confirmed.

You used no facts, only opinions.

Krebs >>>>>> studnicka
Jul. 28, 2021 at 11:34 a.m.
#5
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,649
Likes: 8,289
Krebs is a better prospect I think and I think Smith is better than debrusk but yeah debrusk has a little upside I guess. Even if all things were equal you move him out west not in your division to a rival.
See All