SalarySwishSalarySwish

Eichel but Keeping Dube

Created by: Ledge_And_Dairy
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 15, 2021
Published: Oct. 15, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Roster works with 22 players, send Ritchie down when Eichel gets healthy

Personally i think something like this is a bit more realistic, especially if Monahan is flipped for a 1st + as part of a 3-way deal
Trades
CGY
  1. Eichel, Jack ($500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
*If Calgary makes the 2nd round of the 2022 playoffs and Eichel plays Buffalo gets the lower of Calgary's 2 2nds in 2022
**If Calgary makes the 3rd round of the 2022 playoffs and Eichel plays Buffalo gets the higher of the 2 2nds
***If Calgary makes the finals in 2022 and Eichel plays Buffalo gets the 2022 2st

****If Eichel plays 50% of games in 2023 Biffalo gets the 2023 1st
BUF
  1. Gudbranson, Erik
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. Zary, Connor
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (FLA)
  5. 2023 1st round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$75,287,500$0$0$6,212,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Oct. 15, 2021 at 4:15 p.m.
#1
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,262
Likes: 21,032
There is another way besides losing Monahan as well.

If Lucic agrees to waive his NMC and you include Zadorov cap works. Might have to throw in an extra prospect or two to make Buffalo bite the bullet but with Eichel who cares how many prospects you lose.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Oct. 15, 2021 at 4:24 p.m.
#2
Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 3,053
Buffalo is not going to retain any money for five years. If his deal weren’t so long you’d have a better chance.
Shibbal18 and homiedaclown liked this.
Oct. 15, 2021 at 4:35 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,501
Likes: 19,651
Quoting: Tjm220
Buffalo is not going to retain any money for five years. If his deal weren’t so long you’d have a better chance.


I get what you are saying but I also see it being completely possible. With the cap expected to go up a lot over the next 3 years retaining less than league minimum to make means work should definitely be an option on the table
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Oct. 15, 2021 at 4:42 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: Tjm220
Buffalo is not going to retain any money for five years. If his deal weren’t so long you’d have a better chance.

Toronto retained 1.2mil on Kessel for 7 years. Arizona is retaining 990k on OEL for 6 years. There are definitely crazier things out there, and recent precedents for retaining up to a mil for the last 5 years of this deal. Especially because Buffalo isn’t going to be good for 5 years, and will likely be a floor team for the duration of that.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Oct. 15, 2021 at 4:51 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,501
Likes: 19,651
Quoting: Alfie11
Toronto retained 1.2mil on Kessel for 7 years. Arizona is retaining 990k on OEL for 6 years. There are definitely crazier things out there, and recent precedents for retaining up to a mil for the last 5 years of this deal. Especially because Buffalo isn’t going to be good for 5 years, and will likely be a floor team for the duration of that.


I wouldn't say they wont be "good" for 5 years. I dont think they sit that far off from where Toronto was when they moved Kessel. Draft high this year and next, then Power comes up 2 years from now and they can probably start competing for a playoff spot in around 3-4.

Either way, as I said above the cap is expected to go up a little the next 2 years and a lot 3 years from now so 500k is fairly insignificant, especially since it wont be effecting most of Buffalo's ELC's
Alfie11 and gretzkyghosts liked this.
See All