SalarySwishSalarySwish

No idea how to feel

Created by: AllJonedOut
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 13, 2022
Published: Jul. 13, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
On paper we just cleared up a crap ton of cap space. Maybe the market wasn’t as big as we thought.
Trades
SJS
  1. Lorentz, Steven [RFA Rights]
  2. Mäkiniemi, Eetu
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (CAR)
CAR
  1. Burns, Brent ($2,640,000 retained)
  2. Pederson, Lane
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
19$82,500,000$65,855,834$0$580,000$16,644,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,175,000$2,175,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 13, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#1
go Sharks go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 870
Likes: 402
thought we would get a better deal but overall I think a solid deal for SJ
CheechYou, poeticentropy, AllJonedOut and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:00 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,233
Likes: 1,021
Moving the big contracts is a must. Vlasic buy out next summer
CheechYou and AllJonedOut liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:02 p.m.
#3
AllJonedOut
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 266
Quoting: SJSGM
thought we would get a better deal but overall I think a solid deal for SJ


Wonder what Dallas had on the table. My personal opinion in MG took whatever offer had the most cap space for SJ.
CheechYou and poeticentropy liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:03 p.m.
#4
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 735
A little too much cap retention and not enough of a return (C-level-prospects and a 3rd), but overall glad with the decision to trade out Burns. I imagine Grier didn't have much leverage with only DAL CAR and a unrealistic destination (something like TB) as the only options.
AllJonedOut, poeticentropy, FunMustBeAlways and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 13, 2022 at 1:05 p.m.
#5
AllJonedOut
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 266
Quoting: vols94
Moving the big contracts is a must. Vlasic buy out next summer


It is. EK65 was not as moveable. And was actually way better this season. Albeit in a role that played to his strengths than burns. Vlasics buyout sucks. Depending on where we are. I could see is giving up captia for vlasic salary rather than a buyout.
See All