SalarySwishSalarySwish

If CGY is blowing it up

Created by: Meeqs
Team: 2022-23 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 19, 2022
Published: Jul. 19, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,250,000
Trades
CGY
  1. Behrens, Sean [Reserve List]
  2. Bowers, Shane [RFA Rights]
  3. Compher, J.T.
  4. Olausson, Oskar
  5. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
  6. 2025 2nd round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$81,552,500$25,000$3,562,500$947,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$987,500$987,500
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 19, 2022 at 5:22 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,571
Likes: 19,703
He won't be traded but I would want Girard + Newhook as a base
Jul. 19, 2022 at 5:26 p.m.
#2
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,690
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
He won't be traded but I would want Girard + Newhook as a base


All things considered, I would actually trade Newhook in this situation. Would you accept Toews instead of Girard? I'd do Toews + Newhook for Lindholm and, like a 2024 2nd.
Jul. 19, 2022 at 5:27 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 417
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
He won't be traded but I would want Girard + Newhook as a base


If they're fully rebuilding there is no reason to keep him, if they're going to try and stay competitive then I agree.

I'm not surprised fans on here would prefer a more 'known' quantity in Newhook and I'd be open to a deal like that but it would be a very different package, and I do think the package above is overall better personally.

I would also be open to a deal around Girard as well but I don't feel like that makes any sense for CGY personally, although it would set up their defense for a quicker retool.

Lindholm isn't valuable enough to get both imo.
Jul. 19, 2022 at 5:28 p.m.
#4
Billy739
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 1,629
I dont think they're blowing up
I just think they got screwed filiing for Arbitration

42 goals and 104 pts is not the season you want Arbitration evaluating when determining Term and Cap.
Subban had a great year here, we figured 6-7m and he got 9m on a max term

Given Tkachuk's production and Arbitration Judge's history of overpaying (hence players like Dylan Strome not being QO'd in early to mid 20's)
At the low side CGY is looking at 9m +
If they Subban level overpay you're looking at 11m easy

Its why teams are willing to dump , sell or just no qualify a lot of players going to Arbitration.
Unless they're a top talent its not worth overpaying and even if they are long term its unsustainable
Jul. 19, 2022 at 5:28 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 417
Quoting: NMAvsFan
All things considered, I would actually trade Newhook in this situation. Would you accept Toews instead of Girard? I'd do Toews + Newhook for Lindholm and, like a 2024 2nd.


Toews will never be moved by COL. COL also has 0 use for picks
See All