Who says no

Wow, very interesting in my mind. A.) Kudos for an out of the box trade. I personally hadn't seen this on here before.

From the Hawks point of view...Broberg probably isn't the correct prospect. The Hawks single deepest prospect position is LD. RW is needed though. Maybe Xavier? I'd do that from the Hawks perspective. Jack for 3 more years...I can handle. We've got a lot of goalie prospects needing ice time. He'd just be an expensive backup.

I agree w/ @exo2769. Interesting idea, but Hawks say no. A single 1st and Broberg isn't near enough to take on 4 more years of Campbell, plus Foegele and 50% retention on Mrazak. I'm not sure Broberg is a better prospect than Korchinski or DelMastro. This deal is light at least another 1st rounder.

Hawks decline. Better than the usual Campbell to CHI proposals but as it's been said, there's not enough going to Chicago to take Campbell.

Bouchard doesn't have arbitration rights, so none of this is happening.

But I don't see why you'd expect Edmonton to pay a top prospect + a 1st + a very good 3rd liner + downgrade their goaltending just to save $3M. That's too high a price to pay.

lol at top prospect

lol at very good 3rd liner

lol at 3M savings not being necessary [ignoring the 2.75m dump and other signings] and that this team is better than their current make-up with an equally bad goalie [who has better higher end talent just much less consistent and oft injured] on a much better deal

lol at me for the arb rights mistake, really hoping someone offer sheets him then

what exactly do you think an EDM '25 1st is worth?